Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Econophysicist Predicts Date of Chinese Stock Market Collapse
The Shanghai Composite Index will burst between July 17 and 27, according to a new econophysics forecast.
The boom and bust nature of economics is one of the most puzzling
aspects of the modern world. In the last year or so, many people have
learned to their cost that when bubbles burst, businesses, jobs, and
livelihoods can go with them.
So an obvious question arises: can we spot bubbles when they occur
and predict when they are about to burst? One group of
theorists say that they can and have used their techniques to make an
extraordinary prediction.
First, they say that they've found the telltale signs of a bubble in
the growth rate of the Shanghai Composite stock-market index. And
second, they say that this bubble will burst between July 17 and 27.
That's a brave move, so let's look at it in more detail. The
theorist behind this prediction is Didier Sornette at the Swiss
Federal Institute of Technology, in Zurich, who has pioneered the
study of market bubbles. Last year, he used his method for spotting
bubbles to reveal that oil prices where dangerously inflated.
The
telltale sign of a bubble, he says, is a faster than exponential
growth rate caused by a positive feedback mechanism that generates
this nonlinear growth.
The faster than exponential growth
rate is relatively easy to spot. According to the analysis done by Sornette and a few mates, the Shanghai Composite Index certainly seems to
have had a faster than exponential growth--a 69 percent rise
since October of last year.
Whether an unsustainable positive
feedback mechanism is causing this growth isn't so clear. Sornette
and co suggest that what is responsible is the Chinese government's
massive lending spree designed to maintain its economic growth rate at 8 percent a year. China has maintained that kind of growth for some years now.
Let's
take at face value the idea that a bubble has formed. What of the
prediction that it is about to burst? Just how this team arrives at
such a precise date isn't clear, but whatever the mechanism, this is a
much more speculative move.
One thing that physicists have
learned about complex systems, such as stock markets, earthquakes, and
forest fires, to name just a few, is that when changes occur they are scale invariant.
That means that if you were to
remove the numbers from the axes of a graph plotting this behavior,
there is no way that you could identify the scale of the events by looking
at the plot. This implies that there is really no
difference in principle between a small change in the stock market
today and catastrophic change tomorrow.
That makes predictions of almost anything, let alone the imminent collapse of a bubble, extremely hard to make. Impossible may not be too strong a word for
it.
Sornette and co do not say how they make their prediction, but they do hedge it by
saying, "This will lead to a change in regime which may be a
crash or a more gentle bubble deflation."
But they're still predicting an end to this faster than
exponential growth in the Shanghai Composite Index between July 17 and
27. That change in growth will of course happen one day, but you'd have to have very good reasons to say that it will occur between those two dates. Those reasons are missing from this paper.
I say that this is a prediction that is impossible to
make. And I'm prepared to bet Sornette that he's wrong. The stakes?
Let's say an arXiv blog baseball cap and T-shirt.
Ref:
arxiv.org/abs/0907.1827:
The Chinese Equity Bubble: Ready to Burst
Comments
llimllib
07/14/2009
Posts:2
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/cbuilder?ticker1=SHCOMP:IND
You will see that the bubble bursted on october 2007, fell ~70% to a minimum on october last year and since then it's been recovering.
Alright, it might fall, but not much, since it's just coming from a very deep valley.
MTd2
07/14/2009
Posts:2
It’s a shame that Sornette and co don’t back up their claims with economic theory, it would be interesting to see that.
I would add a bet that a basic multifractal process generates those kinds of fluctuations, on different scales. They never provide a theory to fully justify how the patterns identified would be special marking a bubble, and how these same patterns could be captured within a bottom-up fashion. Furthermore, if they identity multifractal scaling in the markets how do they reconcile that with this special scale specific phenomenon, doesn’t that break the multifractality? And if it breaks, why does it break, what are the economic reasons, for this?
The following two lectures contain explanations by Sornette of this work, in the first lecture he extensively criticizes Fed’s policy and proposes what he sees as solutions:
http://videolectures.net/ccss09_sornette_fbreb/
http://videolectures.net/risc08_sornette_fcrm/
sdavid
07/14/2009
Posts:1
you fool, its near impossible to explain a new theory which challanges the mainstream view (you have to watch CNBC to catch this).
tuscany78
07/15/2009
Posts:1
PMcK
07/15/2009
Posts:1
fainadar
07/18/2009
Posts:1
colinnwn
07/15/2009
Posts:48
Sornette et al. have been developing that kind of model for almost ten years, and have given publicly the demonstration and methodology that allows anybody to calculate precisely the end date of a bubble.
Regarding the auto-realization, there are far too much non-geeks in this world that don't want to/can't understand/implement that type of model...
jeanrobert
08/05/2009
Posts:1
But it seems that together also moved many investors, to increase fonds and capital and so on.
Since last year must of expeculative, volatile fonds like oil , gold, even meals like sugar are hitting Markets all over the world, risen commodities prices.
For me will not be surprising, that next the chinese Stock exchange will overheated... and then... fall down
But this will produce a Tsunami, that will reach
everyone...even us emerging market in Mexico
It is just the consequence of having volatile assets.
I do not have figures, but...Why do you not apply
Whitney Catastrophe theory? This can clear almost
every thing is happening now.
Just my insight
Homero Velazquez
techrevhom
08/12/2009
Posts:1
jstrack2
08/18/2009
Posts:2