Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • TooMany : While the anti-nuke contingent in the US and in parts of Europe continues to rant about the...
  • mulliguns : Points to why a pair may be the most difficult to row successfully, and that sometimes odd size...
  • shaase : It would seem difficult to guarantee that oarsmen all pull with the same force, so it will still...
  • seth : Even though the new arrangements were not immediately obvious, I do think they make common sense....
  • ... : I have examined the major uranium producing countries and made a forecast for 2009, 2010 and...
  • ZephirAWT : Frankly, I don't believe in communication hypothesis wery much, but there's is at least another...
  • ... : http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22114/The link above goes to your Technology Review...
  • jmc8888 : Great explanation of an issue that only concerns the idiots. If running out of nuclear fuel was a...
  • spad12 : "Federally insured loans do not reduce the overall cost of projects, they just shift part of the...
  • Siphon : Of course, many things do change with temperature: density of the radioactive material, which...
  • mbelvadi : I wonder if this model takes into account the slow cumulation of very tiny increments of...
  • ZephirAWT : That's OK, it's word consumption (110 thousands tons of uranium concentrate) - enough to next ten...
  • Bob... : 1) "Federally back the loans..."  Federally insured loans do not reduce the overall cost of...
  • tsport100 : What a load of alarmist rubbish this article is. Australia has 1.2 MILLION tonnes of known...
  • ZephirAWT : /*..Uranium is being taken from coal ash waste...*/It isn't - we are only speculating about it...
  • Colonel... : Says this blog: "The combined threats of climate change, energy security and fears over the high...
  • spad12 : "The initial costs (overnight costs) are very large.    Financing the construction effectively...
  • Bob... : "it is cheap after the initial costs (and even then a large portion of the costs is in the form...
  • pasward : Do they?  If you are headed toward a star, being off by 1,000,000 km is still going to get you...
  • spad12 : A: Most of the current estimates brought up on when we will run out of uranium are based on no...
Advertisement
Thursday, July 09, 2009

Cosmic Ray Moon Shadow Could Reveal Dark Matter

If a strange excess of positrons hitting Earth are created by dark matter, then the way that the moon blocks these impacts could help confirm the idea.

The earth is constantly bombarded by high-energy positrons and electrons. These bombardments generate showers of secondary particles that light up our skies at night, if you have the right equipment to see 'em: so-called imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes. The ratio of electrons to positrons is predicted fairly precisely by our models of the way that cosmic rays interact with objects in the Milky Way.

But here's a conundrum. Various space-based experiments such as PAMELA have recently found an excess of positrons out there, particularly at energies above 10 GeV. That's totally unexpected and difficult to square with the conventional model.

The PAMELA measurement generated excitement because the dark-matter brigade pounced on the result as evidence that dark-matter particles must annihilate each other, producing the excess positrons in the center of our galaxy. These guys were forced to put the champagne back on ice when other astrophysicists pointed out that the positrons could equally be created by particle cascades in the magnetospheres of nearby pulsars.

What's needed, of course, is more measurements of positron/electron ratios, particularly at energies up to a few TeV that cannot yet be made by space-based experiments.

Can the growing number of imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes help? On the face of it, that looks unlikely because there is no way to tell apart the showers created by positrons and electrons when they hit the atmosphere. At least until now.

Today, Pierre Colin and pals at the Max-Planck-Institut fur Physik, in Munich, have come up with an ingenious idea that should be able to tell them apart. Most of the electrons and positrons come from the galactic center. Colin and co point out that when the moon comes between us and the electron/positron source, it creates a shadow that is already used to calibrate imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes.

But here's the interesting idea: Colin and co say that the shadow of charged particles should be deflected by the earth's magnetic field. The electron shadow should be shifted eastward and the positron shadow westward. These imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes should therefore be able to spot the separate shadows, allowing the measurement of positron/electron ratios at energies up to several TeV--well beyond what space-based experiments can achieve.

What's more, imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes ought to be able to spot these shadows now as long as they can make measurements in the glare of the moon. One such instrument, called MAGIC, built by the Max-Planck-Institut fur Physik at Roque de los Muchachos, in the Canary Islands, exactly fits the bill.

The measurements will still be tricky, however, particularly of the positron shadow, which may well be superimposed on the shadow created by positively charged atoms in the cosmic ray spectrum. However, Colin and co think that they ought to be able to pick out the electron shadow with just 50 hours of observing (although that may take several years, given that the shadows occur only at certain times of the year).

That's an ingenious idea that may well give astronomers a way of determining what role dark matter plays, if any, in the creation of these excess positrons.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0907.1026: Observation of Shadowing of the Cosmic Electrons and Positrons by the Moon with IACT


Comments

Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.