arXiv blog

How F = ma Could Break Down at Low Accelerations

If Newton's second law is wrong, we might just be able to see the evidence in the orbital motions of the planets, suggests a new analysis.

kfc 07/08/2009

  • 9 Comments

Newton's second law, F=ma, is one of the bedrocks of modern physics. Or at least it was until the early 1980s, when astronomers noticed that stars orbiting spiral galaxies don't obey it.

Here's the problem. By Newton's law, more distant objects should orbit a central massive object more slowly. That's exactly what happens in the solar system. But the stars in spiral galaxies orbit far more quickly than Newton's law predicts.

Astronomers have proposed two solutions to this conundrum. Most think that there must be a halo of invisible matter pulling the stars in some unseen way. Others think that Newton's law must somehow break down for the tiny accelerations that stars feel in galaxies. These guys have spent the 20 years since then exploring the implications of Modified Newtonian Dynamics, or MOND, led by Mordehai Milgrom from the Weizmann Institute Center for Astrophysics, in Israel, who dreamed up the idea in 1983.

The trouble is that MOND only kicks into action when the acceleration is tiny--so small that no experiment on Earth has been able to distinguish its effects from Newton's law. And measurements on stars in distant galaxies are difficult to make, so it has been hard for astronomers to find evidence for or against it.

But today, Milgrom says that he has calculated a new effect of MOND that should be measurable for planets and comets in the solar system.

The new effect is a quadropole force that repels objects in the space above and below the plane of the solar system while attracting objects that lie within the plane. Milgrom says that this should produce an effect on the precession of the perihelion of planets in the solar system.

He says that the current measurements are not yet precise enough to see or constrain this effect, but the appropriate precision seems to be within reach.

Interestingly, last year astronomers found that the precession of the perihelion of Saturn does not quite fit with predictions.

Could this be the smoking gun that Milgrom is looking for?

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0906.4817: MOND effects in the inner solar system

TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

ZephirAWT

299 Comments

  • 950 Days Ago
  • 07/08/2009

Pioneer anomaly

Limited speed of light and omnidirectional expansion of Universe itself is sufficient for explanation of Pioneer anomaly and Newton law violation. The acelleration of Pioneer anomally agrees well with predictions of MOND theory a = H.c = (8 +- 1)E-10 m/s^2, where H is Hubble law constant. Alternativelly we can consider it as a dragging effect (a dispersion) of background CMB photon field, in AWT these explanations are dual mutually. This duality illustrates, how violation of gravitational law at Pioneer spacecraft scale is related to violation of gravity at Casimir force scale, because Casimir force is shielding effect of these photons.

http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/search/label/dark%20matter

Note that Newton law violation means, equivalence principle is violated for relativity too, because gravitational law remains violated by Casimir force at small distances only.

Reply

  • 950 Days Ago
  • 07/08/2009

other forces

What if there is an other force, apart from gravity, that is acting on those stars in the spiral galaxies and keeping them in place while they spin at higher speeds than predicted by Newton's law?

Ideas?
- a magnetic attraction
- others?

Reply

ZephirAWT

299 Comments

  • 950 Days Ago
  • 07/08/2009

Re: other forces

Gravity field of real objects has bell curve profile. It means, it always contain convex part of positive curvature of space-time, where gravity remains attractive force, but the outside region is of negative curvature, where the same gravity becomes repulsive and such region behaves like massive ring, surrounding solar system or gallaxy.

We should always consider consistent description of reality based on single mechanism (like the space-time curvature here) first before introduction of ad-hoced concepts (hidden forces, fields, unknown particles  and so on). While observed value of anomalous acelleration agrees with theory well, here's no reason to consider another less probable effects, like magnetic field and other phenomena.

Reply

dmm

270 Comments

  • 950 Days Ago
  • 07/08/2009

Boooring!

I'm sorry, but: ho-hum.
Why should we care about tiny effects that are almost impossible to measure?
Are there any significant implications, or are these scientists just OCD?

Reply

ZephirAWT

299 Comments

  • 950 Days Ago
  • 07/08/2009

Re: Boooring!

Existence of such minute effects is significant with respect to our consistent understanding of reality. We are expecting, these forces are just low energy analogy of surface tension at surface of water, atom nuclei or black holes. Because gravity field gradient of solar system is quite flat, its surface tension effects should be weak too, but it should definitelly exist here - or we simply don't understand things well.

Reply

ZephirAWT

299 Comments

  • 950 Days Ago
  • 07/08/2009

quadropole force that repels objects

In AWT the quadrupole force is a result of solar system rotation, where speed of omnidirectional space-time expansion takes place. We can observe it as so called Allais effect during solar eclipse or even directly from outside perspective like dark matter ring around large rotating gallaxies and galactic clusters.

http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap070516.html

From certain extent, we can consider dark matter ring as a phenomena supersymmetrical to black hole rings (i.e. gallaxies) and stellar and planetary rings, like this one illustrated in above post.

Reply

pbfleetwood

1 Comment

  • 949 Days Ago
  • 07/09/2009

Thank you

@ZephirAWT, when presented with comments that are perhaps not well informed or, far worse, unneccesarily dismissive of the subject, educated persons too often--much more often than not, really--reply with disdain or outright aggression.  You, on the other hand, have given informative responses and shown yourself to be good natured.  I've found your responses quite educational.  Thank you.

Reply

Advertisement

ZephirAWT

299 Comments

  • 949 Days Ago
  • 07/09/2009

reply with .. aggression

Thanx for your kind reference.

In AWT such negativism and surface tension is a direct analogy of dark matter phenomena. When some subject gets into pressure, it surround itself by repulsive, negativistic stance. The acceptance of new ideas usually meets with instinctive refusal, which is the more pronounced, the more fundamental these ideas are. Global warming proponents are become surrounded by denialists - the more, the more money is in the game, etc.

Maybe these social analogies will help us understand better, how dark matter phenomena is working in context of information spreading in multiparticle systems.

Reply

ZephirAWT

299 Comments

  • 946 Days Ago
  • 07/12/2009

"Dark matter" at water surface

In AWT the effect of dark matter in vacuum is equivalent to decrease of surface ripples speed with distance due the dispersion of waves in density fluctuations of underwater.

http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2009/07/awt-approach-to-dark-matter.html

Reply

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement