Tuesday, July 07, 2009
Can Pressure Waves Speed Up Nuclear Decay?
If cavitation can speed up the decay of nuclei in solution, we've yet to see good evidence for it.
Is it possible to speed up radioactive decay by squeezing atoms?
In the last few months, Fabio Cardone, at the Institute of
Nanostructured Materials, in Rome, Italy, and a few pals have posted on
the arXiv a growing body of evidence that it is.
In March, Cardone and co reported an increase in neutron emissions when
crushing marble and granite. Their conjecture is that the crushing
causes the piezonuclear fission of iron atoms into two aluminum nuclei
emitting two neutrons.
But our focus today is a paper published in February, in which the team reported that cavitation--the generation and collapse of tiny bubbles in a liquid using pressure waves--causes the rate of decay of thorium-228 in solution to increase 1,000 times.
I guess it's not entirely beyond belief that cavitation could have an effect on the nuclei
of atoms in solution. Cavitation is known to generate huge pressures and temperatures. By some theories, the energy released in this process is close to that needed for fusion. But it's fair to say that the current consensus is that there is no good evidence that this line has been crossed in practice.
Nevertheless, Cardone's claims are interesting, and his paper was published in Physics Letters A earlier this year.
Today, however, Stephan Pomp and pals from Uppsala University, in Sweden, cast some doubt on the result and the methods used by the Cardone team in the Physics Letters A paper.
They point out that the Cardone claim is extraordinary given the body of evidence gathered over the past 100 years about nuclear decay. Such an extraordinary claim should be backed by extraordinary evidence.
"We find that such evidence is missing in this paper and it even seems that methodological mistakes have been made," they say.
Thorium decays by emitting alpha particles. Pomp and pals say that Cardone and co placed their detector underneath the glass vessel containing the thorium solution. "We note that the range of the emitted particles in glass is in the order of tens of micrometers and that it thus would be impossible for particles . . . to penetrate the vessel."
They suggest a number of tests that Cardone and co can do to strengthen their results, such as measuring the background counts when the vessel is empty or filled with pure water in which cavitation is taking place.
It'll be interesting to see the Cardone team's reply to these criticisms; perhaps they'll be able to answer each point made by Pomp and pals.
In the meantime, the question still stands: can pressure waves accelerate nuclear decay? Not on the evidence presented by Cardone and co so far.
Ref:
arxiv.org/abs/0903.3104 : Piezonuclear Neutrons from Fracturing of Inert Solids
arxiv.org/abs/0710.5177: Speeding Up Thorium Decay
arxiv.org/abs/0907.0623: Comments on "Piezonuclear Decay of Thorium" by F. Cardone et al.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Comments
From AWT perspective the vacuum is dense particle system and the fields are mediated by particles too, therefore the increasing of field intensity will lead to increase of vacuum density and decrease of atom nuclei stability. We can estimate the scope of this effect by comparison of density of matter inside of atom nuclei and static energy density of field, generated by pressure. Therefore the increase in decay speed belongs between testable predictions of Aether theory.
It's well known, the explosions of supercummulative warhead is followed by weak radiation. Because the vacuum density increase correspond the gravity field in relativity, we can say, the high pressure results in dilatation of time and local increase of radioactive decay speed from general relativity perspective in similar way, like placement of atom nuclei into gravity field of some massive star. By AWT the evaporation of matter into accretion radiation will occur even at the case, no particle collisions would occur in accretion disk.
http://www.aetherwavetheory.info/images/physics/gravity/blackhole_fall.gif
ZephirAWT
07/08/2009
Posts:158
In all cases, where ß+ decay is allowed energetically and the proton is a part of a nucleus with electron shells, it is accompanied by the electron capture process, when an atomic electron is captured by a nucleus with the emission of a neutrino:
energy + p => n + e+ + ?
When the energy difference between initial and final states is less than 2 mec^2, then ß+ decay is not energetically possible, and electron capture is the sole decay mode. The speed of such process can be indeed increased by compressing of atom orbitals toward atom nuclei. So called halo nuclei with loosely binded neutrons, the so called the Borromean atom nuclei in particular are especially sensitive to electron capture - their binding energy is just about 10.000x lower, then the binding energy of bottom electrons (10 - 100 eV). For example, 83 Rb will decay to 83 Kr solely by electron capture, and the energy difference is about 0.9 MeV.
ZephirAWT
07/08/2009
Posts:158
http://arxivblog.com/?p=596
and tried to explain by distance changes in solar neutrino flux. In my opinion we should try to corellate these changes with CMB anisotropy field instead, which creates weak density gradient through whole solar system oriented toward Virgo cluster, because distance corellation was doubted recently.
http://tinyurl.com/kruerb
As another evidence can serve the observation of such anisotropy in larger distance from Sun, where influence of solar neutrino flux should be neglected. The decay of plutonium powering interplanetary probes like Voyager, Pioneer, Galileo or Cassini can be used to test such hypothesis.
http://www.astroengine.com/?p=1382
ZephirAWT
07/08/2009
Posts:158
Exploding nucleus of atoms emit/radiate waves of energy. This waves of energy have a nature of electrons and particles. Also electrons and particles exploding and emit exploding energy.
Electrons just move next exploding nucleus of atoms and get this exploding energy outside.
Before that electrons give some change of pressure for energy that push out exploding nucleus of atoms and then nornnew electrons that move to next exploding nucleus of atoms etc.
http://onesimpleprinciple.com/296
.
Mr. Pressure
08/19/2009
Posts:1
(Clarification: this onesimple etc is trolling numerous pages with his silly theory and everyone is getting really tired of him. He's a Finn and yes, we do have our share of lunatics here).
smithsomian
08/20/2009
Posts:71