Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • Mr CP : Wow!  These games are almost as fun as throwing a real ball around!  Almost.  :)
  • scoubidoo : I suggest you visit the NooJ website: http://www.nooj4nlp.net/pages/nooj.htmland discover the...
  • coolmike : The other issue that is being overlooked is the type of prepaid service, and how the cost impacts...
  • jhertzberg : I checked the date as I read this (nope, not April 1st). How long until we start using...
  • jtempere : Both yttrium barium copper oxide and the family of bismuth strontium calcium copper oxides have...
  • sleeprun : We read a Wharton study of doctors influencing new treatment adoption.  It was not the most...
  • ZephirAWT : isn't completelly new in this context, as the simmilar concept was proposed by Mark Hucko in 1985...
  • ZephirAWT : If I understood it well, by your theory matter universe is surrounded by antimatter universe and...
  • matt_s : Couldn't we theoretically save the earth from the eventual expansion of the sun in it's...
  • ... : This is not about the originators of ideas, but about how the ideas spread. A well connected...
  • debu : Please read my ether-gravity or theory of gravitoethertons which explains many aspects of quantum...
  • ms : So is AMSC selling superconducting wire that doesn't exist?
  • shazl : I believe the results are not only because of somebody being post-paid or pre-paid. It's...
  • ... : I am surprised no one is addressing an immediate need for energy here on earth, and what this...
  • IXANTI666 : THE NEXT STEP HUMAN TELEPORTATION.SINCE WE ARE MADE UP OF QUATUM MATTER TO BEGIN WITH TO BORROW...
  • 020648 : try www.prisonplanet.tv
  • ZephirAWT : And what prohibits scientists in ATTEMPT to replicate J.F.Prins experiments? Are they so...
  • ... : Make me some 90K Tc superconductor and I'll finish my PhD in a month! How's this for a conspiracy...
  • sfrysfry : For ideas on entangling larger structures, I introduce the conjecture of Nicholas Greaves, an...
  • snedunuri : This might explain how UFOs get the energy they need to travel interstellar distances. Either...
Advertisement
Monday, July 06, 2009

Why Incompetence Spreads through Big Organizations

Promoting the people most competent at one job does not mean that they'll be better at another, according to a new simulation of hierarchical organizations.

There's a paradox at the heart of most Western organizations. The people who perform best at one level of an organization tend to be promoted on the premise that they will also be competent at another level within the organization. I imagine that most readers will have had personal experience at the way that this hypothesis fails in practice.

In 1969, a Canadian psychologist named Laurence Peter encapsulated this behavior in a rule that has since become known as Peter's Principle. Here it is:

"All new members in a hierarchical organization climb the hierarchy until they reach their level of maximum incompetence."

That's not as unfair as it sounds, say Alessandro Pluchino and buddies from Universita di Catania, who have modeled this behavior using an agent-based system for the first time. They say that common sense tells us that a member who is competent at a given level will also be competent at a higher level of the hierarchy. So it may well seem a good idea to promote such an individual to the next level.

The problem is that common sense often fools us. It's not so hard to see that a new position in an organization requires different skills, so the competent performance of one task may not correlate well with the ability to perform another task well.

Peter pointed out that in large organizations where these practices are used, it is inevitable that individuals will be promoted until they reach their level of maximum incompetence. The unavoidable result is the runaway spread of incompetence throughout an organization.

Now Pluchino and co have simulated this practice with an agent-based model for the first time. Sure enough, they find that it leads to a significant reduction in the efficiency of an organization, as incompetency spreads through it. That must have an uncomfortable ring of truth for some CEOs.

But is there a better way of choosing individuals for promotion? It turns out that there is, say Pluchino and co. Their model shows that two other strategies outperform the conventional method of promotion.

The first is to alternately promote first the most competent and then the least competent individuals. And the second is to promote individuals at random. Both of these methods improve, or at least do not diminish, the efficiency of an organization.

Interesting idea that would be fascinating to see in action. What would be a suitable prize for the first CEO to implement such a policy?

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0907.0455: The Peter Principle Revisited: A Computational Study

Comments

  • CEO's can read!
    alapkd, you must be a CEO...but at least you can read :)

    techguy322
    07/06/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • True
      This makes perfect sense.  Every large organization I've worked with, for, or been part of falls into this paradigm.

      Example:

      The Army, in the 60's and 70's you could be an E6, E7, E8 and not be a people manager.  You were the Lead Specialist.  Now you have to be a manager or you can’t get promoted and thus forced out. 

      Sales role, you are an excellent salesperson blowing out your number YOY.  However, you are expected to take over as a Sales Manager.  Completely failing because you're not a manager and don’t have the ability to manage.

      General Manager, excellent at running the regional market.  Leading and strategically guiding that specific sector. Promoted to VP of multiple sectors and fail because you don't have the necessary broad vs deep knowledge and management style.

      Each of this instances are exactly what they are talking about.  The best of the best and the worst of the worst all because of a promotion, either forced or otherwise.  Sometimes it's just better to leave those in a specific position in that position and allow them to do what they are good at.

      But, that's not the real problem is it.  People stop doing what they are good at because they've peaked in a specific role and can't grow (financially).  Which forces them to stay there indefinitely, leave, or get promoted.  Perhaps the real problem is that Big Organizations pay based on title rather than experience and excellence.  Or maybe, we're just geared towards an upward momentum and haven't learned that staying where you are isn't a bad thing.

      Then again, you could go the route of the Federal Government and promote people that fail at one level…  look where that promotion style got us.

      spaq.yetti@g...
      07/06/2009
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: What About Competence?
        It seems that in addition to spreading incompetence throughout a big organization, there is also widespread competence. Just like in a body with both good and defective genes, the corporation will always have both types. Then assuming this is correct, the key to avoiding business failure, such as with General Motors, is a larger, overriding issue that points to the need for competent control and direction over a defective, non-perfect organization.

        bmpress
        07/12/2009
        Posts:3
        Avg Rating:
        2/5

This discussion has been moved to our discussions forum.

Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.