How to Reduce Cell-Phone Radiation Exposure
A new network architecture could dramatically reduce the radiation exposure from cell phones.
kfc 07/02/2009
- 12 Comments
Here's a simple idea for creating a cell-phone network that minimizes the radiation exposure for callers while maximizing the battery life of handsets.
Today's cell-phone networks consist of base stations that both transmit and receive signals. The strength of the signals that a handset has to generate depends on how far away it is from such a base station. Obviously, handsets in smaller cells transmit at a lower power, reducing the user's radiation exposure.
So in theory, you could reduce users' radiation exposure from handsets by reducing the size of the cells that each base station serves. But in practice, that isn't possible because people who live nearby naturally object to the constant exposure that a base station would expose them to.
But Doron Ezri and Shimi Shilo at Greenair Wireless, an Israeli startup, have dreamed up a way around this. Their idea is to enhance existing networks by adding large numbers of base stations that only receive signals and are connected up to the rest of the network via a landline or a line-of-sight microwave link.
This creates large numbers of microcells in which the handsets can transmit at low power while the existing base stations continue to do the transmitting. So during any conversation, the handset transmits to one of the new nearby base stations but receives from a more distant conventional base station.
And since the new base stations only receive, there shouldn't be the same kind of objections to putting them up. At least that's what Ezri and Shilo think.
Although the jury is still out on the health risks of mobile-phone radiation exposure, it seems wise to employ the precautionary principle whenever possible. Greenair is the startup that Ezri and Shilo have created to commercialize the idea, which should improve battery life to boot.
Good luck to them, but a word of advice: never underestimate the power of the NIMBYs.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0906.5289: Green Cellular--Optimizing the Cellular Network for Minimal Emission from Mobile Stations
On Twitter
Become a Fan on Facebook
Subscribe to the Feed
norm
3 Comments
Is this a new idea?
It seems the main purpose of this paper is to provide a reference to lock up patents on this idea. I find it hard to believe this idea is novel and had assumed it was already in widespread use, for the simple reason (not even related to safety) that a base transmitter can transmit much more energy than a handheld cell phone, thus requiring more receiving antennas than transmitting antennas.
From the FCC's RF Safety FAQ's: "In urban and suburban areas, cellular and PCS service providers commonly use 'sector' antennas for their base stations. These antennas are rectangular panels, e.g., about 1 by 4 feet in size, typically mounted on a rooftop or other structure, but they are also mounted on towers or poles. Panel antennas are usually arranged in three groups of three each. It is common that not all antennas are used for the transmission of RF energy; some antennas may be receive-only" [emphasis mine]
It seems what's novel is calling a receive-only station a "green antenna" and emphasizing its already-existing safety aspect. Let's just hope the patent office does some background legwork before blindly issuing these patents and letting these people sue existing installations out of business.
Reply
rekalman
2 Comments
Re: Is this a new idea?
Seems it is a new idea.
While current communications technologies employ receive only antennas (most technologies supporting MIMO do, as WiMAX, LTE, WiFi), these receive only antennas are co-located with transceiver antennas (say on the same tower).
The new (and seems brilliant) idea here is that the receive only antennas are distributed away from transceiver antennas. The paper shows these new antennas can significantly reduce radiation from mobile devices.
Good luck to Doron and Shimi for this new idea.
Reply