Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • shaase : It would seem difficult to guarantee that oarsmen all pull with the same force, so it will still...
  • seth : Even though the new arrangements were not immediately obvious, I do think they make common sense....
  • ... : I have examined the major uranium producing countries and made a forecast for 2009, 2010 and...
  • ZephirAWT : Frankly, I don't believe in communication hypothesis wery much, but there's is at least another...
  • ... : http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22114/The link above goes to your Technology Review...
  • jmc8888 : Great explanation of an issue that only concerns the idiots. If running out of nuclear fuel was a...
  • spad12 : "Federally insured loans do not reduce the overall cost of projects, they just shift part of the...
  • Siphon : Of course, many things do change with temperature: density of the radioactive material, which...
  • mbelvadi : I wonder if this model takes into account the slow cumulation of very tiny increments of...
  • ZephirAWT : That's OK, it's word consumption (110 thousands tons of uranium concentrate) - enough to next ten...
  • Bob... : 1) "Federally back the loans..."  Federally insured loans do not reduce the overall cost of...
  • tsport100 : What a load of alarmist rubbish this article is. Australia has 1.2 MILLION tonnes of known...
  • ZephirAWT : /*..Uranium is being taken from coal ash waste...*/It isn't - we are only speculating about it...
  • Colonel... : Says this blog: "The combined threats of climate change, energy security and fears over the high...
  • spad12 : "The initial costs (overnight costs) are very large.    Financing the construction effectively...
  • Bob... : "it is cheap after the initial costs (and even then a large portion of the costs is in the form...
  • pasward : Do they?  If you are headed toward a star, being off by 1,000,000 km is still going to get you...
  • spad12 : A: Most of the current estimates brought up on when we will run out of uranium are based on no...
  • Eutropia : Isn't uranium responsible for a large amount of the heat generated within the earth? Isn't it...
  • dbiello : Peak uranium has been bandied about almost as long as peak oil. And this is certainly not the...
Advertisement
Monday, June 29, 2009

Carbon Ring Storage Could Make Magnetic Memory 1,000 Times More Dense

Attach a couple of cobalt molecules to a ring of carbon and you have the dream memory material.


There's a challenge facing electronics engineers attempting to build magnetic memory that can store data for more than 10 years or so. The density at which this data is stored depends on the size of the magnetic grains used for this process. Engineers have known for some time that they just can't continue to make these grains indefinitely smaller.

But today, Ruijuan Xiao at the Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Research, in Dresden, Germany, and a few buddies have worked out how to solve the problem. And get this: their fix doesn't just tweak the density of magnetic data storage. They reckon that they can get an improvement of three orders of magnitude.

Here's some background. In magnetic storage, the data is stored in the orientation of the field in a specific magnetic domain. So the task for data-storage guys is to find a material in which the spontaneous reversal of this magnetic field occurs significantly less often than once every 10 years. This is related to how easy it is to flip the magnetic field from one direction to another, known as the magnetic anisotropy energy (MAE).

It turns out that cobalt has the highest MAE of the ferromagnetic elements, which is why it is the material of choice for magnetic data recording.

The trouble is that the MAE of any material depends on its structure. The grains of cobalt in state-of-the-art data storage consist of about 50,000 atoms in a hexagonal close packed structure. In this formation, cobalt has an MAE of 0.06 meV per atom.

It should be possible to reduce the size of these grains to about 15,000 atoms, but in grains any smaller than that, it becomes impossible to guarantee the hexagonal close packing. And without that structure, the MAE drops precipitously and the data is lost over much shorter timescales.

What Xiao and co have found is a way to trick cobalt dimers into thinking that they're in a hexagonal close packed structure. Their idea is to attach the dimers to a hexagonal carbon ring such as benzene or graphene. In this scenario, one of the pair of cobalt atoms bonds with the carbon ring, and the magnetic field between the cobalt atoms can be switched by applying a weak magnetic field and a strong electric field.

Now in this setup, the MAE of cobalt is calculated to be about 100 meV. And while chemical bonds usually have a significant effect on the MAE, Xiao and co say that the carbon hexagons do not.

If they're right, carbon ring storage should allow engineers to access this extraordinary stability, and that could lead to fantastically long-lived memory.

It should also allow much higher memory density too. The cobalt grains now used in magnetic storage are roughly 8 nm across. Benzene rings, on the other hand, are merely 0.5 nm across.

The only question now is whether this team's calculations hold true in the real world.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0906.4645: Co Dimers on Hexagonal Carbon Rings Proposed as Subnanometer Magnetic Storage Bits

Comments

  • How small of the metal wire?
    We suppose certain method is found to attach small-size cobalt atom cluster to the hexagonal carbon ring such as benzene or graphene, then we need two metal wires to control the state of the unit (0 or 1). The width of the metal wire may be as small as 0.1nm.
    Now the minimum width of the best CPU (like Intel's i7 core) is about 40-50nm, we can say so far it is too early to talk about 1000 denser magnetic memory technology.

    It is a good research topic for the researchers in universities, but not for the engineers in companies.
    If I were an engineer, I would like to spend more time and money on the research about how to develop the longer life of the Flash memory and decrease the manufacture cost.
    Some time ago I read an article in which mentions Sun Company will publish a new type long-life Flash memory in 2009. The new Flash memory can withstand 1 million times write&erase cycle, but not just 10 thousand times.

    Rate this comment: 12345

    gearss
    06/30/2009
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.