• 974 Days Ago
• 06/10/2009

I guess we'll see thermal phonons following a black body radiation distribution.

• 965 Days Ago
• 06/19/2009

BEC & blackholes

Has anyone ever heard it suggested before that the most dense portions of the interiors of blackholes could in fact have many BEC-like properties, including the possibility that all black holes throughout the universe (or, at least the largest ones) are actually instantaneously non-locally quantum entangled, each black hole core having lost its identity in space-time, its wave forms unable to tell the difference between being here or there, so in effect is everywhere through out the unverse at once (wherever there is a large blackhole, anyway), like what happens to the wave forms in BEC's? If it is possible for black holes to periodically transform into white holes, this would mean instantaneously that whatever happens to or by one, happens to all at the same time. The universe might suddenly become rather unfriendly to have lots of mini-big bangs unleashed, especially out of the cores of galaxies. If it has been proposed before, where might I find the reference?

• 920 Days Ago
• 08/03/2009

Hawking radiation

Is Hawking radiation compatible with the existence of blackholes?
www.noblackholes.com/hawking_radiation.html

• 874 Days Ago
• 09/18/2009

Hawking radiation

The coexistence of black holes and Hawking radiation may be widely accepted--but their mutual existence is contradicted by simple logic.  Consider the perspective of the distant observer.  A black hole takes an infinite time to form, but before infinity Hawking radiation will have destroyed any black hole that could form.  The second Law of thermodynamics (of which Hawking radiation is just one expression), therefore, must destroy the matter compacting into a black hole before the black hole is actually formed.  For more discussion on this topic, see the papers posted at noblackholes.com.

• 833 Days Ago
• 10/29/2009

Gravity is a Push

Black holes are neither. Space-time and matter are mutually antagonistic. Gravity is not a force, just a consequence of this interaction of space-time and matter. When enough matter is concentrated in one place, space-time is twisted to the point that a balance is reached between space-time and matter. This balance results in a "bubble" of matter of nearly infinite density becoming virtually a two-dimensional sphere with nothing on the inside.
When a star collapses, space-time is stressed to the point that it rebounds forcing the mass outward resulting in a nova. If there is enough matter, space-time pressure (gravity) will balance the outward pressure of collapsed space-time resulting in a black hole.
Extrapolating backward in time, the beginning of our observable universe can be attributed to the intrusion of matter/energy into this space-time continuum. The reaction of space-time on this intrusion dispersed most the intrusion driving it violently apart. The remainder became a bubble of space-time with a two-dimensional surface; the first black hole.
Incidentally, gravity is not a force. Gravity is the consequence of the mutual antagonism of matter and space-time. This antagonism results in spherical planets, the limit of the speed of light, and the accelerating expansion of the universe.
As a consequence, gravity does not precisely follow the Newtonian Inverse Square Law. Observations of trajectories of spacecraft slingshoting around planets show a clear, consistent discrepancy between the mathematical predictions and actual results. These are just some observations that are not adequately accounted for by conventional theories of gravity:
• Extra fast stars: Stars in galaxies follow a distribution of velocities where stars on the outskirts are moving faster than they should according to the observed distributions of normal matter. Galaxies within galaxy clusters show a similar pattern. Dark matter, which would interact gravitationally but not electromagnetically, would account for the discrepancy. Various modifications to Newtonian dynamics have also been proposed.
• Pioneer anomaly: The two Pioneer spacecraft seem to be slowing down in a way which has yet to be explained.[1]
• Flyby anomaly: Various spacecraft have experienced greater accelerations during slingshot maneuvers than expected.
• Accelerating expansion: The metric expansion of space seems to be speeding up. Dark energy has been proposed to explain this.
• Anomalous increase of the AU: Recent measurements indicate that planetary orbits are expanding faster than if this was solely through the sun losing mass by radiating energy.
• Extra energetic photons: Photons travelling through galaxy clusters should gain energy and then lose it again on the way out. The accelerating expansion of the universe should stop the photons returning all the energy, but even taking this into account photons from the cosmic microwave background radiation gain twice as much energy as expected. This may indicate that gravity falls off faster than inverse-squared at certain distance scales[4].
• Dark flow: Surveys of galaxy motions have detected a mystery dark flow towards an unseen mass. Such a large mass is too large to have accumulated since the Big Bang using current models and may indicate that gravity falls off slower than inverse-squared at certain distance scales[4].
• Extra massive hydrogen clouds: The spectral lines of the Lyman-alpha forest suggest that hydrogen clouds are more clumped together at certain scales than expected and, like dark flow, may indicate that gravity falls off slower than inverse-squared at certain distance scales[4].
These and other observations suggest a revision of classical gravitational theory is necessary.
If, as I suggest, gravitation is a consequence of space-time pressure on matter due to mutual antagonism, then gravitational phenomena are not linear but volume dependent, then, instead of an inverse square law, gravitation requires an inverse cube law; Gravity at A = gravity at B × (distance B / distance A)3 .
Interestingly, this suggests that what is called the Strong Nuclear Force that serves to hold atomic nuclei together is not a separate force at all, but the very same space-time pressure that results in what we perceive as gravity. This theory also accounts for the galactic rotational anomalies “explained” by the fallacy of dark matter and the accelerating expansion of the universe attributed to “dark energy.”
Using simple, undergraduate level equations, the mass pressure of space-time can easily be calculated as 5.757 X 10-17 gs. Using this, the observable limit of the speed of light in a vacuum becomes a consequence of space-time pressure. This is the calculation: Space-time mass pressure @ C = 1.727 X 10-26 m/gs2. Incidentally, this means that photons have mass, despite what you read in high school physics textbooks.
Further research to refine mathematical rigor and make the observational measurements necessary is indicated.
1. ^ Wanted: Einstein Jr, The Economist, 6th March 2008.
2. ^ Dark energy may just be a cosmic illusion, New Scientist, issue 2646, 7th March 2008.
3. ^ Swiss-cheese model of the cosmos is full of holes, New Scientist, issue 2678, 18th October 2008.
4. ^ a b c "Where Matter Fears to Tread", New Scientist issue 2669, 14 March 2009