Sustainability: The Clue That Could Solve Fermi's Paradox
If civilizations can't grow exponentially, that might explain why we don't see any signs of ET.
kfc 06/04/2009
- 19 Comments
While lunching with colleagues at the Los Alamos National Labs in 1950, Enrico Fermi began a discussion about the likelihood of intelligent life existing elsewhere in the universe. The size and age of the universe makes it seem probable that many advanced societies ought to exist. But if they did, where are they? he asked.
This problem has since become known as the Fermi Paradox, and many a canteen lunch has been spent discussing its resolution (we discussed one possible solution a few months back).
Today, Jacob Haqq-Misra and Seth Baum at Pennsylvania State University put forward another idea. They point out that the Fermi Paradox assumes an exponential spread of civilizations across galaxies. Such an expansion must be closely linked with expansion in population, environmental impact, and the consumption of resources.
The problem is that this kind of growth may not be possible, and they look at Earth as an example. For any expansion to be sustainable, the growth in resource consumption cannot exceed the growth in resource production. And since Earth's resources are finite, and it has a finite mass and receives solar radiation at a constant rate, human civilization cannot sustain an indefinite, exponential growth.
So we'll have trouble colonizing the galaxy, if we ever decide that's necessary. At the very least, the spread of our civilization will not be exponential, if it is possible at all.
Haqq-Misra and Baum say that this argument means that any extraterrestrial civilization must be similarly constrained.
The Fermi Paradox often leads to the conclusion that other advanced civilizations do not exist. Haqq-Misra and Baum say that this is unduly pessimistic. What the Fermi Paradox implies is that intelligent civilizations capable of exponential expansion do not exist.
And that's a very different proposition.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0906.0568: The Sustainability Solution to the Fermi Paradox
On Twitter
Become a Fan on Facebook
Subscribe to the Feed
marcelo.rinesi
1 Comment
For any expansion to be sustainable, the growth in resource consumption cannot exceed the growth in resource production. And since Earth's resources are finite, it has a finite mass and receives solar radiation at a constant rate, human civilization cannot sustain an indefinite, exponential growth.
I don't think this is the argument in the paper. Earth's resources are finite, but a multi-planetary civilization has by definition access to more than one Earth, so as long as they don't consume more resources per planet than there are available, there is no constraint to the total size of the civilization.
The paper's argument is a bit subtler (although possibly made more confusing than necessary by the references to our single-planet civilization, which doesn't translate well to the more unconstrained general case). It simply states that the Fermi Paradox assumes exponential growth in a civilization, and thus failure to observe extraterrestrial intelligences is only an argument against exponential growth civilizations. While it is true that an Earth-bound civilization might find exponential growth unsustainable because of resource constraints, they don't claim that such resource constraints will make the exponential growth of other civilizations unsustainable, only that some mechanism might be impeding exponential growth, and thus make current observations consistent with the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence.
Reply