Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • ... : Libertarians have been touting the wisdom and prophetic analysis of Ludwig von Mises for decades....
  • MattGaucho : 500 Kelvin is less than 450F.  You can reach this temperature in a toaster oven.
  • ... : Thomas Paine gives an accurate synopsis of how science is taught without asking certain questions...
  • fcofbe : Thanks for the tip, norm.  We should have known about the MD5 problem.  We have now added SHA-2...
  • tonyzito : I'm not sure this thing fits the definition of a perfect black body either.  A perfect black body...
  • norm : His predictions are secret documents based on MD5 checksums. MD5 was cracked in 2005, when...
  • Bonobo : "When greedy, immoral, short-term thinking people are involved, there's going to be a crash." ...
  • lasertekk : Thank you Sam.  Let's take that one more step forward.  When greedy, immoral, short-term thinking...
  • ssamd : Here is another way to forecast a crash.  When regulations are striped there will be a crash. ...
  • ... : What bubble in shanghai? For instance,The Economist doesn't think a bubble exists (yet) Analysing...
  • gary7 : Clothes, paper, wood and brick are all non-metallic, easily penetrated by terahertz radiation. I...
  • dan_kolis : As important as this area of inquiry is, it is burdened by being right on the tough love spot...
  • ZephirAWT : Personally, I disagree. In AWT time dimension is defined by direction of gradient of Aether...
  • Fabrizio : Perhaps this quest for an explanation to the arrow of time arises from the same misconception...
  • Mapou : You are 100% correct but you will not get any love from the physics community for saying this....
  • captpaul : The very first question of the paper is flawed and will lead to another Not Even Wrong theory....
  • gemay : The operative phrase is "...fitted to most aircraft."  Since there is no FAA requirement that all...
  • ... : zoroasterisk,That is an amazing statement. First the discussion is about a God who loved and...
  • ZephirAWT : We cannot neglect fact, one half of Universe evaporates and separates by antigravity (radiation...
  • TooMany : Please check into Roman technology; they keep finding more.  The other day I read that the...
Advertisement
Tuesday, June 02, 2009

How to See Diffraction Patterns with Star Crusts

If neutron stars have thin crystalline crusts, then we ought to see diffraction patterns in x-rays reflected from their surfaces.

Nobody knows what the surface of neutron stars are made of but there's no shortage of suggestions. We know that iron must play a role because we can see its characteristics absorption lines in the spectrum from these exotic objects.

But we can't tell whether the iron forms a gaseous atmosphere, perhaps a meter or so thick above an ultra-hard crust, or whether the iron itself is solid.

Now Felipe Llanes-Estrada and Gaspar Moreno Navarro at the Universidad Complutense in Madrid Spain, say they know how to tell the difference. Here's how:

If the iron is solid, then it ought to form an extraordinary crystal, perhaps a few dozen atomic layers thick, almost perfectly smooth and enveloping the entire star.

One way to examine crystalline solids is to use x-ray crystallography. The new idea from Llanes-Estrada and Navarro is to look for pairs of neutron stars in which one is an x-ray pulsar and the other is dead with an iron crust. Then x-rays from the pulsar should be diffracted from the surface of the dead star and detectable on Earth. The signature would consist of a main pulse from the pulsar followed by the reflection at wavelengths related by Bragg's law of diffraction to the main pulse.

That's a neat and potentially clean way to study the surface of neutron stars: if astronomers can find the right kind of pairs.

If they do, it'll be a breath of fresh air for astrophysicists who have many ideas about the structure and behaviour of neutron stars but few ways to prune the dead wood from the theoretical undergrowth they've created.

Something for the team behind the Chandra X-ray telescope to get to work on, I'd say.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0905.4837: Bragg diffraction and the Iron crust of Neutron Stars

Comments

  • Neutron star crust and sectarian society
    Scientists can be pretty innovative and inventive, when it comes to various subtleties of their theories - but surprisingly rigid and ignorant, when they're expected to advance in understanding of more general and fundamental principles, because their interactions and personal stances compensate mutually - only their inertia remains. While such skepticism works well at small scale as a barrier against fringe speculations - at larger scope it becomes a brake of further evolution.

    The crust of neutron stars exhibits dual behavior typical for every close sectarian society or boson condensate: from inside it's superfluid, from outer perspective it's brittle and rigid material, simmilar to charge carriers in superconductors, when manipulated by external magnetic field (Meissner-Ochsenfeld effect).
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ZephirAWT
    06/02/2009
    Posts:96
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • perhaps a few dozen atomic layers thick
    This assumption is nice, but it contradicts to another recent article(s), by which neutron stars should be covered by mountains. So we can develop both theory of surface difraction patterns, both theory of surface quakes unmolested - and everybody remains happy... Is it OK - or not?

    http://news.softpedia.com/news/Neutron-Stars-May-Also-Have-Mountains-82175.shtml

    The only problem is, both ideas are gratefull source on new publications and grant support, so that layman society is forced to pay extrapolations of mutually contradicting hypothesis just because such extrapolations are 1) possible to generate, 2) they're sufficiently nontrivial to pass peer-review and 3) nobody has realized, they're contradicting mutually. Myriads of string theories and subtheories are illustrative example of this blind approach.  Why not to formalize a hollow Earth hypothesis after then, for example?

    In such way, under sufficient amount of scientific theories theoretical physics becomes drain of money for all people involved because of lack of public feedback. We shouldn't extrapolate existing theories too much, until we aren't sure about validity of their postulates from efficiency reasons.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ZephirAWT
    06/02/2009
    Posts:96
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: perhaps a few dozen atomic layers thick
      Where's the contradiction?

      Xray diffraction is a function of the crystal structure of the solid at an atomic level.  The gross external shape of the crystal (i.e. mountains) is not really a factor.

      What's this stuff about secular society and your anti-science rants?  What have they got to do with a proposed method for the crystallographic analysis of the surface of neutron stars?

      (Edit: Never mind, I just looked at the commenter's profile, it links to a blog on Aether Wave Theory, an *ahem* "alternative" theory of physics whose adherents - including possibly this guy - like to troll and harass science forums with their confused physicsbabble until they get banned, at which point they start claiming persecution by dogmatic mainstream scientists.  That, I guess, is why the two above posts kept veering off into off topic rants, dropped physics jargon at random and why the poster doesn't seem to know what crystallography is...)
      Rate this comment: 12345

      travism
      06/03/2009
      Posts:8
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.