Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • TooMany : While the anti-nuke contingent in the US and in parts of Europe continues to rant about the...
  • mulliguns : Points to why a pair may be the most difficult to row successfully, and that sometimes odd size...
  • shaase : It would seem difficult to guarantee that oarsmen all pull with the same force, so it will still...
  • seth : Even though the new arrangements were not immediately obvious, I do think they make common sense....
  • ... : I have examined the major uranium producing countries and made a forecast for 2009, 2010 and...
  • ZephirAWT : Frankly, I don't believe in communication hypothesis wery much, but there's is at least another...
  • ... : http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22114/The link above goes to your Technology Review...
  • jmc8888 : Great explanation of an issue that only concerns the idiots. If running out of nuclear fuel was a...
  • spad12 : "Federally insured loans do not reduce the overall cost of projects, they just shift part of the...
  • Siphon : Of course, many things do change with temperature: density of the radioactive material, which...
  • mbelvadi : I wonder if this model takes into account the slow cumulation of very tiny increments of...
  • ZephirAWT : That's OK, it's word consumption (110 thousands tons of uranium concentrate) - enough to next ten...
  • Bob... : 1) "Federally back the loans..."  Federally insured loans do not reduce the overall cost of...
  • tsport100 : What a load of alarmist rubbish this article is. Australia has 1.2 MILLION tonnes of known...
  • ZephirAWT : /*..Uranium is being taken from coal ash waste...*/It isn't - we are only speculating about it...
  • Colonel... : Says this blog: "The combined threats of climate change, energy security and fears over the high...
  • spad12 : "The initial costs (overnight costs) are very large.    Financing the construction effectively...
  • Bob... : "it is cheap after the initial costs (and even then a large portion of the costs is in the form...
  • pasward : Do they?  If you are headed toward a star, being off by 1,000,000 km is still going to get you...
  • spad12 : A: Most of the current estimates brought up on when we will run out of uranium are based on no...
Advertisement
Tuesday, June 02, 2009

How to See Diffraction Patterns with Star Crusts

If neutron stars have thin crystalline crusts, then we ought to see diffraction patterns in x-rays reflected from their surfaces.

Nobody knows what the surface of neutron stars are made of but there's no shortage of suggestions. We know that iron must play a role because we can see its characteristics absorption lines in the spectrum from these exotic objects.

But we can't tell whether the iron forms a gaseous atmosphere, perhaps a meter or so thick above an ultra-hard crust, or whether the iron itself is solid.

Now Felipe Llanes-Estrada and Gaspar Moreno Navarro at the Universidad Complutense in Madrid Spain, say they know how to tell the difference. Here's how:

If the iron is solid, then it ought to form an extraordinary crystal, perhaps a few dozen atomic layers thick, almost perfectly smooth and enveloping the entire star.

One way to examine crystalline solids is to use x-ray crystallography. The new idea from Llanes-Estrada and Navarro is to look for pairs of neutron stars in which one is an x-ray pulsar and the other is dead with an iron crust. Then x-rays from the pulsar should be diffracted from the surface of the dead star and detectable on Earth. The signature would consist of a main pulse from the pulsar followed by the reflection at wavelengths related by Bragg's law of diffraction to the main pulse.

That's a neat and potentially clean way to study the surface of neutron stars: if astronomers can find the right kind of pairs.

If they do, it'll be a breath of fresh air for astrophysicists who have many ideas about the structure and behaviour of neutron stars but few ways to prune the dead wood from the theoretical undergrowth they've created.

Something for the team behind the Chandra X-ray telescope to get to work on, I'd say.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0905.4837: Bragg diffraction and the Iron crust of Neutron Stars

Comments

  • Neutron star crust and sectarian society
    Scientists can be pretty innovative and inventive, when it comes to various subtleties of their theories - but surprisingly rigid and ignorant, when they're expected to advance in understanding of more general and fundamental principles, because their interactions and personal stances compensate mutually - only their inertia remains. While such skepticism works well at small scale as a barrier against fringe speculations - at larger scope it becomes a brake of further evolution.

    The crust of neutron stars exhibits dual behavior typical for every close sectarian society or boson condensate: from inside it's superfluid, from outer perspective it's brittle and rigid material, simmilar to charge carriers in superconductors, when manipulated by external magnetic field (Meissner-Ochsenfeld effect).
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ZephirAWT
    06/02/2009
    Posts:99
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • perhaps a few dozen atomic layers thick
    This assumption is nice, but it contradicts to another recent article(s), by which neutron stars should be covered by mountains. So we can develop both theory of surface difraction patterns, both theory of surface quakes unmolested - and everybody remains happy... Is it OK - or not?

    http://news.softpedia.com/news/Neutron-Stars-May-Also-Have-Mountains-82175.shtml

    The only problem is, both ideas are gratefull source on new publications and grant support, so that layman society is forced to pay extrapolations of mutually contradicting hypothesis just because such extrapolations are 1) possible to generate, 2) they're sufficiently nontrivial to pass peer-review and 3) nobody has realized, they're contradicting mutually. Myriads of string theories and subtheories are illustrative example of this blind approach.  Why not to formalize a hollow Earth hypothesis after then, for example?

    In such way, under sufficient amount of scientific theories theoretical physics becomes drain of money for all people involved because of lack of public feedback. We shouldn't extrapolate existing theories too much, until we aren't sure about validity of their postulates from efficiency reasons.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ZephirAWT
    06/02/2009
    Posts:99
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: perhaps a few dozen atomic layers thick
      Where's the contradiction?

      Xray diffraction is a function of the crystal structure of the solid at an atomic level.  The gross external shape of the crystal (i.e. mountains) is not really a factor.

      What's this stuff about secular society and your anti-science rants?  What have they got to do with a proposed method for the crystallographic analysis of the surface of neutron stars?

      (Edit: Never mind, I just looked at the commenter's profile, it links to a blog on Aether Wave Theory, an *ahem* "alternative" theory of physics whose adherents - including possibly this guy - like to troll and harass science forums with their confused physicsbabble until they get banned, at which point they start claiming persecution by dogmatic mainstream scientists.  That, I guess, is why the two above posts kept veering off into off topic rants, dropped physics jargon at random and why the poster doesn't seem to know what crystallography is...)
      Rate this comment: 12345

      travism
      06/03/2009
      Posts:8
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.