Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • ... : Thomas Paine gives an accurate synopsis of how science is taught without asking certain questions...
  • fcofbe : Thanks for the tip, norm.  We should have known about the MD5 problem.  We have now added SHA-2...
  • tonyzito : I'm not sure this thing fits the definition of a perfect black body either.  A perfect black body...
  • norm : His predictions are secret documents based on MD5 checksums. MD5 was cracked in 2005, when...
  • Bonobo : "When greedy, immoral, short-term thinking people are involved, there's going to be a crash." ...
  • lasertekk : Thank you Sam.  Let's take that one more step forward.  When greedy, immoral, short-term thinking...
  • ssamd : Here is another way to forecast a crash.  When regulations are striped there will be a crash. ...
  • ... : What bubble in shanghai? For instance,The Economist doesn't think a bubble exists (yet) Analysing...
  • gary7 : Clothes, paper, wood and brick are all non-metallic, easily penetrated by terahertz radiation. I...
  • dan_kolis : As important as this area of inquiry is, it is burdened by being right on the tough love spot...
  • ZephirAWT : Personally, I disagree. In AWT time dimension is defined by direction of gradient of Aether...
  • Fabrizio : Perhaps this quest for an explanation to the arrow of time arises from the same misconception...
  • Mapou : You are 100% correct but you will not get any love from the physics community for saying this....
  • captpaul : The very first question of the paper is flawed and will lead to another Not Even Wrong theory....
  • gemay : The operative phrase is "...fitted to most aircraft."  Since there is no FAA requirement that all...
  • ... : zoroasterisk,That is an amazing statement. First the discussion is about a God who loved and...
  • ZephirAWT : We cannot neglect fact, one half of Universe evaporates and separates by antigravity (radiation...
  • TooMany : Please check into Roman technology; they keep finding more.  The other day I read that the...
  • TooMany : The claimed non-null results sound quite significant, unless the measurements were in the noise.
  • ZephirAWT : Now we know, they can.
Advertisement
Wednesday, May 27, 2009

How to Use Pulsars for Interstellar Navigation

The signals from pulsars form a natural GPS system that could locate any object in the galaxy to within a meter.

The Global Position System has revolutionised navigation on Earth. It consists of a network of satellites that each broadcast a time signal. A receiver on Earth can then work out its position in three-dimensional space by comparing the arrival times of the signals from at least three satellites. But the system cannot help with navigation on an interplanetary scale or beyond.

Today, Bertolomé Coll at the Observatoire de Paris in France and a friend, Albert Tarantola, propose an interstellar GPS system that has the ability to determine the position of any point in the galaxy to within a metre.

Their idea is to tune in to the signals from four pulsars: 0751+1807 (3.5ms), 2322+2057 (4.8ms), 0711-6830 (5.5ms) and 1518+0205B (7.9ms), which each generate regular millisecond radio signals.

These form a rough tetrahedron centred on the Solar System.

Why four pulsars? Coll points out that on these scales relativity has to be taken into account when processing the signals and to do this, the protocol has to specify a position in space-time, which requires four signals.

Coll then defines the origin for this system of co-ordinates as 00:00 on 1 January 2001 at the focal point of the Interplanetary Scintillation Array, the radio telescope near Cambridge in the UK that first observed pulsars.

With the co-ordinate system established, any interplanetary spacecraft could then use the signals from these pulsars to determine its position in this co-ordinate system to within a few nanoseconds, which corresponds to about a metre.

Handy, and cheap too.

Ref: http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.4121: Using Pulsars to Define Space-Time Coordinates

Comments

  • GPS uses 4+ sats too
    FYI, most implementations of GPS (and certainly your carnav system) use at least 4 satellites, too. If you want to get away with three, you'd need to know your position in the fourth dimension, time. And since clocks with long-term sub-millisecond precision are pretty expensive, a fourth satellite is needed. Note that most car nav systems set the minimum a bit higher to get a reasonable precision.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    tulcod
    05/27/2009
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: GPS uses 4+ sats too
      I believe the fourth satalite actually helps with the problem of time dilation by gravitational redshift, as well. But whatever, the point of the article is interesting.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Danieleveld
      05/27/2009
      Posts:17
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
    • Re: GPS uses 4+ sats too
      I believe you will find that when dealing only with time signals (rather than specific time delays) you must have four such signals to locate yourself relative to the arrayed sources.  GPS can do it with three by assuming you are located on the surface of an idealized "Earth"  -- thus removing one degree of freedom from the equations.  If you also want to know your actual altitude you need the forth time signal.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      usscod
      05/28/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • Pulsars for earthbound nav?
    Could the principle be used to replace current GPS-based navigation on earth?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    raoulteeuwen
    05/27/2009
    Posts:2
    • Re: Pulsars for earthbound nav?
      No, you need to be able to see at least 4 satellites/pulsars at a time to be able to accurately navigate and the earth's rotation would often prevent this.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      oconnor0
      05/27/2009
      Posts:1
    • Re: Pulsars for earthbound nav?
      Terrestrial surface navigation would presumably need far more than 4 pulsars since one or more of them would be hidden behind the Earth. I wonder if there are enough suitable pulsars for continuous surface navigation.  If so, it would appear the Department of Defense has wasted a lot of money on satellites.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      bildan
      05/27/2009
      Posts:14
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re: Pulsars for earthbound nav?
      If you want to carry a bouquet of radio telescopes in your back pocket... 

      A spacecraft can use a phased array of antennae to pick up a bunch of pulsars at once.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      ncm
      05/28/2009
      Posts:14
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
    • Re: Pulsars for earthbound nav?
      Everybody seems a little confused. 

      First off, this is not a new idea: http://pdf.aiaa.org/jaPreview/JGCD/2006/PVJA13331.pdf

      Also, X-Rays get absorbed by the atmosphere so occlusion is not the problem. 

      GPS doesn't do you much good beyond GEO. 
      Rate this comment: 12345

      doogie
      05/29/2009
      Posts:1
  • Pioneer F Plaque
    Isn't this what is etched on the Pioneer F plaque?

    The radiating lines at left represents the positions of 14 pulsars, a cosmic source of radio energy, arranged to indicate our sun as the home star of our civilization.

    from http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/ABSTRACTS/GPN-2000-001623.html
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jesusgarza
    05/27/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: Pioneer F Plaque
      If there are 14 suitable pulsars, it would seem that the same system could be used for terrestrial navigation and perhaps we could have a little less 'future space junk'.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      wayneNtampa
      05/27/2009
      Posts:1
  • limitations
    The proposed system has two very important limitations compared to GPS. 

    With GPS, you can turn on your receiver at any time and (when it syncs up) it will tell you your location and the time.  With their system, you had to have monitored the pulsars during your entire trip, so you know how many pulses have passed.  Looked at another way, you have to already know your location within a light-millisecond or so (~300 km) before you can use pulsar-based navigation to estimate your location within a few m.

    Second, the GPS signal uses direct sequence spread spectrum, which lets you receive it even though it may be 1000 times quieter than the thermal noise.  You won't have that advantage with the pulsars, so you'll need a lot of antenna gain.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    vanzandtj
    05/27/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: limitations
      Even if only relative position can be calculated it still sounds interesting. I agree with the point that the real problem is to know how complicated is to detect this signals with a small antenna.

      If the implementation cost are small, could be nice to incorporate this concept into the next space probes to test the concept and probably help understanding  the Pioneer anomaly.

      A question: Do pulsar's emission have any modulation over the main mode that may help to lock into the signal at a worse signal to noise ratio?

      Cheers,
                      RH
      Rate this comment: 12345

      rodolfoherma...
      05/27/2009
      Posts:1
  • correction and long-range considerations
    This article says the 4-pulsar scheme would work for navigation "anywhere in the galaxy."

    The paper says the scheme is for "anywhere in the Solar system or in the solar systems in this part of the Galaxy." (emphasis mine)

    A practical limitation for use "anywhere" is implied by the paper: For observers at two locations A and B to share a common reference origin, something must first travel from A to B while recording or counting the pulsar signals. I think this is to establish the common time origin, since the pulsars are emitting clock ticks, not an absolute "this is the time" signal.

    In-system, NTP (Network Time Protocol) might obviate the traveling timebase. (See Timekeeping in the Interplanetary Internet)

    If there is a reliable time base function that can be measured at interstellar distance, such as a known monotonic decrease in pulsar frequency, perhaps measuring that function could sufficiently initialize a galaxy-wide coordinate system without shipping a moving timebase. This would be desirable in-system too, after humans are using local space.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    bill-tr
    05/27/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • Interstellar Navigation
    For those in this thread dissecting why this system is inferior to GPS, you are overlooking one glaring point, the spacecraft. We can't even get to Mars and survive yet; let alone any Star Trekian fantasies. It may prove useful for deep space probes in the future, but for now it is more akin to debating if Kirk is better than Picard.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jmaximus9
    05/28/2009
    Posts:83
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.