Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • TooMany : While the anti-nuke contingent in the US and in parts of Europe continues to rant about the...
  • mulliguns : Points to why a pair may be the most difficult to row successfully, and that sometimes odd size...
  • shaase : It would seem difficult to guarantee that oarsmen all pull with the same force, so it will still...
  • seth : Even though the new arrangements were not immediately obvious, I do think they make common sense....
  • ... : I have examined the major uranium producing countries and made a forecast for 2009, 2010 and...
  • ZephirAWT : Frankly, I don't believe in communication hypothesis wery much, but there's is at least another...
  • ... : http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22114/The link above goes to your Technology Review...
  • jmc8888 : Great explanation of an issue that only concerns the idiots. If running out of nuclear fuel was a...
  • spad12 : "Federally insured loans do not reduce the overall cost of projects, they just shift part of the...
  • Siphon : Of course, many things do change with temperature: density of the radioactive material, which...
  • mbelvadi : I wonder if this model takes into account the slow cumulation of very tiny increments of...
  • ZephirAWT : That's OK, it's word consumption (110 thousands tons of uranium concentrate) - enough to next ten...
  • Bob... : 1) "Federally back the loans..."  Federally insured loans do not reduce the overall cost of...
  • tsport100 : What a load of alarmist rubbish this article is. Australia has 1.2 MILLION tonnes of known...
  • ZephirAWT : /*..Uranium is being taken from coal ash waste...*/It isn't - we are only speculating about it...
  • Colonel... : Says this blog: "The combined threats of climate change, energy security and fears over the high...
  • spad12 : "The initial costs (overnight costs) are very large.    Financing the construction effectively...
  • Bob... : "it is cheap after the initial costs (and even then a large portion of the costs is in the form...
  • pasward : Do they?  If you are headed toward a star, being off by 1,000,000 km is still going to get you...
  • spad12 : A: Most of the current estimates brought up on when we will run out of uranium are based on no...
Advertisement
Friday, May 22, 2009

Where the Equivalence Principle Breaks Down

Modified gravity theories violate the equivalence principle. If they are correct, we should see the effect in nearby galaxies.

One way to explain the puzzling acceleration of the universe is to modify Einstein's theory of general relativity to create a fifth force that can account for the acceleration. These theories have to be carefully constructed so that this fifth force works on the cosmic scale but not on the scale of planets like ours, where we'd have spotted it by now.

Today, Christopher Stubbs from Harvard University in Cambridge and a couple of buddies from Columbia University in New York city examine the consequences of this idea.

Their main result is that on a galactic scale, these modified versions of gravity would cause a failure of the equivalence principle: so gravitational and inertial mass would no longer be the same for galactic objects. That means large objects like galaxies would not all fall at the same speed.

That should have some easily observable effects. For example, small galaxies should accelerate faster than large galaxies while stars and diffuse gas in small galaxies should have different velocities, even if they
are on the same orbits.

So with the right kind of gear it should be possible to confirm the predictions of these modified theories of gravity or put strong limits on the influence they must be having.

Better get those lens cloths out and start dusting off a few old plates.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0905.2966: Equivalence Principle Implications of Modified Gravity Models

Comments

  • Conceptually,
    Equivalence Principle breaks down everywhere, where (general) relativity breaks down, i.e. at quantum scale in particular, because quantum mechanics products different results, then relativity.

    http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2009/03/inconsistency-of-general-relativity.html

    For example, at the moment when antigravity behavior will be confirmed for antiparticles or dark matter, it's evident, the gravity force doesn't follow inertial force in its consequences (gravitational lensing, etc).

    Under more general view, though, all these violations of relativity are just consequences of it in more general reference frame at mutually perpendicular direction(s)/dimension(s).

    http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2009/05/four-approaches-to-dark-matter.html
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ZephirAWT
    05/22/2009
    Posts:99
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • There is no acceleration
    There is no acceleration of the expansion of the universe. It is an observation error caused by a relativity effect on a positively curved universe. The slower speeds observed for farther objects are caused by the curvature, not slower speeds.

    The expansion itself is in a hidden dimension we call "time". We can not perceive this dimension as a space dimension, because it is Lorentz-contracted to zero length.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    MidiMagic
    06/10/2009
    Posts:5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.