Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • ta2025 : adding to the previous comment, this drive concept sounds very similar to the drives envisioned...
  • ArdRhi : The device being proposed to test this principle bears a striking resemblance to something that...
  • lilykim : It seems that an added issue might be preserving not only the data and the software, but the...
  • ... : Think outside the box for a moment buddy! Try the block!
  • flared0ne : Although now that you mention it, a "neutrino" star would be fairly "interesting" -- although the...
  • ZephirAWT : It's not so difficult to predict neutrino stars, in fact most of common black holes should be...
  • ... : Well, I will not like to brand myself as relativist in the sense that we understand the term...
  • ... : Let me put the same question differently...Can galaxy have its own gravitational force? or, Can...
  • ... : Theoretically, what is the difference between a galaxy and a star apart from the fact that galaxy...
  • ZephirAWT : /*..we must rely on all you disciplined and rigorous scientists..*/I wouldn't be so defeatist,...
  • ZephirAWT : IMO time arrow is irreversible, because it's just defined so. Phenomena, which occurs in...
  • Liam : The body of the article claims the possibility of effecting a delta v without a reaction mass,...
  • ... : That's good question. First thing we need to ask is, 'what this 'something is?' If it is...
  • rkomatsu : Question: if quantum superposition (something in two states simultaneously) doesn't exist in...
  • doanwon : I am a lay person also and will try to express my understanding for the purpose of learning. ...
  • ... : Well, well. The limits I have discussed here does not restrict our capabilities as human beings....
  • ammona : I am fascinated to find out more about this.  I'm a non-specialist (a philosopher who's been...
  • Zukunft : As a lay person interested in science, I find that limits are always superseded.......Clearly, as...
  • ... : The article epitomizes the absurdities that seem to be becoming part of scientific exploration....
  • ZephirAWT : In AWT we can distinguish at least two dual perspectives, how to describe the chaotic universe:...
Advertisement
Wednesday, May 20, 2009

How Gravitational Waves Could Generate Radio Signals

The radio signals produced by passing gravitational waves could make them easier to detect.

Any time now, the folks at the gravitational wave detector LIGO expect to come across conclusive evidence that their search is over. If the theorists have their numbers right, the machine should spot a passing gravitational wave sometime in the next year or so.

LIGO works by watching for the tell-tale squeezing and stretching of space as gravitational waves pass by. But might there be another way to spot these waves?

For some 40 years now, various physicists have pointed out that gravity waves ought to produce electromagnetic waves. Today, Peter Hogan and Shane O'Farrell at University College Dublin in Ireland resurrect the idea.

The mechanism is straightforward. Create a uniform magnetic field of the same scale as a gravitational wave and place it in the path of an incoming wave. The subsequent squeezing and shaking of this magnetic field should then generate electromagnetic radiation, just as any other kind of shaking would.

The trouble is that gravitational waves have a tiny amplitude and a relatively low frequency meaning that the resultant radio waves would be mind-bogglingly weak. (Obviously, higher frequency g-waves will produce higher frequency em waves.)

Would they be harder to detect than a change in length of less than the diameter of proton, as LIGO measures?

That's hard to say. Those calculations simply haven't been done yet. But it'll be interesting see what numbers they produce.

About 1 per cent of the noise you see on the screen of a badly-tuned analogue TV is the cosmic background radiation--the echo of the Big Bang. Wouldn't it be cool to know that your old Sony Trinitron could also tune into the sound of black holes colliding.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0905.2834: Generating Electromagnetic Waves from Gravity Waves in Cosmology


Comments

  • Corollary?
    If a photon has energy and therefore effective mass, is it true that a passing interstellar photon gravitationally attracts peripheral masses existing in the plane orthogonal to its path, by an admittedly minute (but still non-zero) amount?

    If such masses are pulled inwards towards a photon as it travels through their region, (just as they would be by the gravitational force of a passing 'physical' mass), will this attraction create a kind of 'contractive wave' around the photon as it travels?

    If so, it seems to me this would impart very slight but non-zero energy kinetic energy to these peripheral masses such as gas molecules and stars, thus reducing the energy of the travelling photon.

    Does it really follow then that the energy of such a photon is dissipated by swapping energy to these peripheral masses via the minute effective gravitational force of the photon energy?

    If so, does this dissipative energy loss then red-shift the photon cumulatively over its total path?
    If this effect exists, could it be at least partially responsible for the cosmological red-shift.

    If so this would presumably alter our estimate of the rate of expansion of the universe, and various dependent and associated factors?

    Also, maybe we could use a form of "red-shift" astronomy, to estimate mass-densities in different regions of space over the path of light originating from slightly different angles and distances, semi-tomographically? (assuming we could estimate distances of sources by independent means)

    Very interested to hear any comments, thanks John :)
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jjalexand
    05/21/2009
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Corollary?
      (from the same author)

      One minor addition to this is that if the peripheral masses move slightly towards the path of the photon, then their distance from it is surely ever so slightly less on its outbound path (away from them) than it is on its inbound path (towards them). (Because they have moved closer to the photon during its period of travel through their region).

      Therefore it would seem that the magnitude of the inbound acceleration of the photon as it approaches any peripheral masses is marginally less than the magnitude of the outbound de-acceleration as it departs from them.

      Does this effect cause a second form of energy loss for the passing photon?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      jjalexand
      05/21/2009
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • More but a bit off topic
        (posted by the same author)

        Looking at the idea in the second posting more closely, it seems that any expanding cylinder of peripheral masses around a path (the axis) of a traveling mass will accelerate that mass along its path gravitationally. (This will happen in either direction through the cylinder). This is because the inbound acceleration from the gravitational pull of the peripheral masses in the walls of the cylinder is greater than the pull of the now more distant wall masses on the outbound path, resulting in net acceleration of a mass along its path (or blue shifting of an equivalent photon on the same path), and vice versa for a contracting cylinder.

        This would also seem to be approximately true for the path of a mass or photon through any large enough expanding cloud of distributed separating masses (i.e. not just traveling though the axis of a cylinder).

        Ironically therefore, it appears to me that photons traveling in a _contracting_ universe would seem to be _red-shifted_ by this gravitational effect and photon paths in an _expanding_ universe would seem to be _blue shifted_ by this effect, and that these effects might also make some contribution to the red-shifts we observe.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        jjalexand
        05/21/2009
        Posts:3
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.