Thursday, May 14, 2009
Could All Particles Be Mini Black Holes?
The idea that all particles are mini black holes has major implications for both particle physics and astrophysics, say scientists.
Could it really be possible that all particles are mini-black holes? That's the tantalising suggestion from Donald Coyne from UC Santa Cruz (now deceased) and D C Cheng from the Almaden Research Center near San Jose.
Black holes are regions of space in which gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape.
The trouble with gravity is that on anything other than an astrophysical scale, it is so weak that it can safely be ignored. However, many physicists have assumed that on the tiniest scale, the Planck scale, gravity regains its strength.
In recent years some evidence to support this contention has emerged from string theory where gravity plays a stronger role in higher dimensional space. It's only in our four dimensional space that gravity appears so weak.
Since these dimensions become important only on the Planck scale, it's at that level that gravity re-asserts itself. And if that's the case, then mini-black holes become a possibility.
Coyne and Cheng ask what properties black holes might have on that scale and it turns out that they may be far more varied than anyone imagined. The quantisation of space on this level means that mini-black holes could turn up at all kinds of energy levels. They predict the existence of huge numbers of black hole particles at different energy level. So common are these black holes that the authors suggest that:
"All particles may be varying forms of stabilized black holes"
That's an ambitious claim that'll need plenty of experimental backing. The authors say this may come from the LHC, which could begin to probe the energies at which these kinds of black holes will be produced.
The authors end with the caution that it would be wrong to think of the LHC as a "black hole factory"; not because it won't produce black holes (it almost certainly will), but because, if they are right, every other particle accelerator in history would have been producing black holes as well.
In fact, if this thinking is correct, there's a very real sense in which we are made from black holes. Curious!
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0905.1667: A Scenario for Strong Gravity in Particle Physics: An Alternative Mechanism for Black Holes to Appear at Accelerator Experiments
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Comments
kdrys
05/15/2009
Posts:1
jbertz
05/15/2009
Posts:1
The gradient of gravity of every massive object exists at the surface. This curvature of space-time is equivalent to energy density of space-time, which is equivalent to mass density by E=mc^2 formula. This additional mass density balances the curvature of the space-time, which has caused gravity field originally.
Note that large space-time curvature at the surface of massive object will lead to violation of buoyancy condition, because mass/energy density may become higher here, then at the center of massive object - which would lead to undulations of space-time and indeterministic quantum mechanics behavior.
http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2009/05/four-approaches-to-dark-matter.html
ZephirAWT
05/15/2009
Posts:158
test1
05/21/2009
Posts:1
There should be references to his work in these articles.
curious1
06/05/2009
Posts:1
Maybe there is some quantum principle like the quantized orbitals of electrons that causes an equilibrium state that will not evaporate or grow. There is a repulsive force as electrons get too close to atomic nuclei. Maybe there is a repulsive force that keeps black hole/particles
from merging together into bigger black holes.
A new class of astronomical objects called eternally collapsing objects might include subatomic particles with eternally collapsing event horizons. http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.2532
protn7
07/29/2009
Posts:70
magdala
07/29/2009
Posts:8
magdala
07/29/2009
Posts:8
magdala
07/29/2009
Posts:8
magdala
07/30/2009
Posts:8
In a black hole you cant see any light so i assume that when the lightwave in the black hole suddenly ends that you begen to travel faster than the speed of light, so that would be proving Einstine wrong. I am sorry if this has already been said, for i have not heard it before.
rstevens
08/27/2009
Posts:1
http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~ulf/fibre.html
For me this idea is significant because it reintroduces concept of background extradimensional field, aka Aether. Just continue in your research and maybe you become famous physicist after few years... 8=)
ZephirAWT
08/28/2009
Posts:158
ZephirAWT
08/28/2009
Posts:158
A black hole, simplifying, is the interaction of the space with particles´ gravity.
In the Donald Coyne and DC Cheng hypothesis all particles are stabilized mini black hole. That will be the interaction of the gravity of a single particle with the space.
I thing that hypothesis is right or in correct direction.
I always have exposed (in two books) that the material particle is the interaction of the vibratory complex of the particle with vibratory space in expansion, giving rise to braking effect, the cause of the corresponding velocity´ reduction and the gravity and mass.
For Coyne and Cheng the interaction, obviously a great energy´ collision, is a mini black hole.
My condolences for Donald Coyne´ loss, and I be grateful for email address of DC Cheng.
Best wishes from: Ramon Marquès
Ramon Marquè...
09/12/2009
Posts:1