Could All Particles Be Mini Black Holes?
The idea that all particles are mini black holes has major implications for both particle physics and astrophysics, say scientists.
kfc 05/14/2009
- 17 Comments
Could it really be possible that all particles are mini-black holes? That's the tantalising suggestion from Donald Coyne from UC Santa Cruz (now deceased) and D C Cheng from the Almaden Research Center near San Jose.
Black holes are regions of space in which gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape.
The trouble with gravity is that on anything other than an astrophysical scale, it is so weak that it can safely be ignored. However, many physicists have assumed that on the tiniest scale, the Planck scale, gravity regains its strength.
In recent years some evidence to support this contention has emerged from string theory where gravity plays a stronger role in higher dimensional space. It's only in our four dimensional space that gravity appears so weak.
Since these dimensions become important only on the Planck scale, it's at that level that gravity re-asserts itself. And if that's the case, then mini-black holes become a possibility.
Coyne and Cheng ask what properties black holes might have on that scale and it turns out that they may be far more varied than anyone imagined. The quantisation of space on this level means that mini-black holes could turn up at all kinds of energy levels. They predict the existence of huge numbers of black hole particles at different energy level. So common are these black holes that the authors suggest that:
"All particles may be varying forms of stabilized black holes"
That's an ambitious claim that'll need plenty of experimental backing. The authors say this may come from the LHC, which could begin to probe the energies at which these kinds of black holes will be produced.
The authors end with the caution that it would be wrong to think of the LHC as a "black hole factory"; not because it won't produce black holes (it almost certainly will), but because, if they are right, every other particle accelerator in history would have been producing black holes as well.
In fact, if this thinking is correct, there's a very real sense in which we are made from black holes. Curious!
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0905.1667: A Scenario for Strong Gravity in Particle Physics: An Alternative Mechanism for Black Holes to Appear at Accelerator Experiments
On Twitter
Become a Fan on Facebook
Subscribe to the Feed
kdrys
1 Comment
Photons
But if a particle emits energy (a photon for example), then how can it abide by the classic black hole law that nothing, not even light, can escape a black hole? Thus, how could a photon be considered a mini black hole? Or is this one of the variations of this theory?
Reply
jbertz
1 Comment
Re: Photons
photons are massless, no? I don't think they could be considered in this case.
Reply
ZephirAWT
299 Comments
Re: Photons
The question isn't, whether particles are black holes or not - but what we can predict by using of such analogy. Personally I can see this model rather misleading, especially with respect to classical model of black holes. Black holes are stabilized by their surface tension by the same way, like quantized particles.
The gradient of gravity of every massive object exists at the surface. This curvature of space-time is equivalent to energy density of space-time, which is equivalent to mass density by E=mc^2 formula. This additional mass density balances the curvature of the space-time, which has caused gravity field originally.
Note that large space-time curvature at the surface of massive object will lead to violation of buoyancy condition, because mass/energy density may become higher here, then at the center of massive object - which would lead to undulations of space-time and indeterministic quantum mechanics behavior.
http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2009/05/four-approaches-to-dark-matter.html
Reply
randers5
1 Comment
Re: Photons
I'm guessing the particles they are thinking to be black holes are just leptons (i.e: quarks, electrons), not force carrying particles like gluons and photons.
A Kerr-Newman mini-black hole (MBH) would possess angular momentum and charge, like a lepton. Since, at macroscopic distances from the hole, it's gravitational field and cross section would be negligible, one could approximately model the hole as a dimensionless charge and mass. Then, if the hole were to change its state of motion (i.e: bound state transition), QM and classical EM theory would predict the emission of waves/photons.
The cross-section of the MBH is going to be very small, most likely negligible, in comparison to the wavelength of the photon's wavefunction. The photon would not have a defined location on the scale of the black hole cross section. It would escape the event horizon without measurable redshift in a way analogous to quantum tunneling.
If all leptons are such holes, then experiments might be able to reveal this by examining extremely tiny scales, at which point the space-time curvature (gravitation) and cross-section would no longer be negligible.
Reply