Is Pluto Being Pulled by the Pioneer Effect?
If the Pioneer effect is real, then the outer planets ought to be tugged by it too.
kfc 05/07/2009
- 8 Comments

Here's an interesting take on the Pioneer effect--the mysterious deceleration that seems to be afflicting Pioneer 10 and 11 as they head out of the Solar System.
If the effect is real, it ought to influence the orbits of the outer planets. Pluto, in particular, ought top feel this force if it's out there. In the last few years, a few astronomers have calculated what sort of influence the Pioneer effect should have on Pluto, concluding that it should produce significant periodic effects. The fact that we don't see these effects means we can rule out the Pioneer effect as a phenomenon affecting the outer planets, they say. And that means it probably isn't a fundamental effect but some kind of artifact.
But now it sees that it's too early to be making these kinds of assertions. Gary Page from George Mason University in Virginia and a couple of pals say the calculations are less than convincing. They point out that our knowledge of Pluto's orbit is based entirely on optical observations and so are far less well characterised than the nearer planets.
In fact, so poor is our knowledge of Pluto's orbit that it is impossible to say whether it is being pulled by a Pioneer-like force or not.
Page and pals say:
"Of course, this does not mean that the Pioneer effect exists. It does mean that we cannot deny the existence of the Pioneer
effect on the basis of motions of the Pluto as currently known."
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0905.0030: How Well Do We Know The Orbits Of The Outer Planets?



ZephirAWT
299 Comments
Pioneer effect
is basically a dark matter phenomena - as it manifests by weak decelleration, which is a product of Hubble constant and speed of light.
By general relativity the Lense-Thirring effect (a "frame dragging") is a consequence of composition of motion of objects and limited speed of light, which leads to shear-like motion of curved space-time during rotation of massive bodies. If we consider an omnidirectional universe expansion defined by Hubble constant, the intensity of shear-like motion would become dependent to distance from object: it would decrease with distance, as the light effectivelly freezes in expanding space-time - which would result into dark matter phenomena.
This doesn't say, at the case of large gallaxies, the dark matter cannot contain a material particles trapped inside of expanding space-time, the antimatter particles in particular. But the primary reason of dark matter is of relativistic nature in my opinion.
Reply
Danieleveld
28 Comments
Re: Pioneer effect
I'm not exactly following where dark matter has anything to do with what you are saying. Maybe I'm totally misunderstanding you, which is likely.
Even in an omni-directional universe, our solar system is nearly aligned on a single plane. Any body of mass, great or small, moving or not, still compresses space to some degree. Since our solar system is so well aligned, and there are plenty of big, moving objects in it, it stands to reason that those forces would compress space closer to the sun and dilate it out radially from the sun all along that plane. Pluto should be moving through space much faster than anything closer to the sun, just like in redshift dilation (well, BECAUSE of RSD).
The only non-artifact reason for the pioneers slowing down is that they are moving into denser space- which is the only logical tie I can think of to dark matter; perhaps space is compressed because of the pressence of DM at quantity? So even if DM is not directly interacting with standard matter, it can still influence it by dilating/compressing space.
Reply
sanman
31 Comments
Re: Pioneer effect
Hi,
I thought Dark Matter was associated with the galaxies not whirling apart due to their spin. So maybe he is saying that there is some MACHO or WIMP effect that is similarly taking place around our solar system's periphery. ie. something pulling/pushing everything inward.
Reply