Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • ... : Well, I did log in and searched in vain for your "withering reply".  Is it perhaps subtly hidden...
  • TooMany : While the anti-nuke contingent in the US and in parts of Europe continues to rant about the...
  • mulliguns : Points to why a pair may be the most difficult to row successfully, and that sometimes odd size...
  • shaase : It would seem difficult to guarantee that oarsmen all pull with the same force, so it will still...
  • seth : Even though the new arrangements were not immediately obvious, I do think they make common sense....
  • ... : I have examined the major uranium producing countries and made a forecast for 2009, 2010 and...
  • ZephirAWT : Frankly, I don't believe in communication hypothesis wery much, but there's is at least another...
  • ... : http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22114/The link above goes to your Technology Review...
  • jmc8888 : Great explanation of an issue that only concerns the idiots. If running out of nuclear fuel was a...
  • spad12 : "Federally insured loans do not reduce the overall cost of projects, they just shift part of the...
  • Siphon : Of course, many things do change with temperature: density of the radioactive material, which...
  • mbelvadi : I wonder if this model takes into account the slow cumulation of very tiny increments of...
  • ZephirAWT : That's OK, it's word consumption (110 thousands tons of uranium concentrate) - enough to next ten...
  • Bob... : 1) "Federally back the loans..."  Federally insured loans do not reduce the overall cost of...
  • tsport100 : What a load of alarmist rubbish this article is. Australia has 1.2 MILLION tonnes of known...
  • ZephirAWT : /*..Uranium is being taken from coal ash waste...*/It isn't - we are only speculating about it...
  • Colonel... : Says this blog: "The combined threats of climate change, energy security and fears over the high...
  • spad12 : "The initial costs (overnight costs) are very large.    Financing the construction effectively...
  • Bob... : "it is cheap after the initial costs (and even then a large portion of the costs is in the form...
  • pasward : Do they?  If you are headed toward a star, being off by 1,000,000 km is still going to get you...
Advertisement
Friday, May 01, 2009

Entropy and Our Cosmic Telephone Number

How can the cosmos have the entropy we see today if the temperature was almost exactly the same everywhere after the Big Bang? The answer may lie in our "cosmic telephone number".

When it comes to big question, there aren't much bigger than this: what is the entropy of the Universe, the amount of disorder or "mixedupness" in the cosmos?

Max Tegmark at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge tackles exactly this question in a talk he gave at an MIT Symposium, called "Meeting the Entropy Challenge", the transcript of which is now on the arXiv. A video of the talk is below.

On the one had is the question: why is the entropy of the universe so low?

"When the universe was much younger, the temperature was almost exactly the same everywhere. We started out 400,000 years after our big bang in a situation where the density was almost perfectly uniform throughout our observable universe, and the temperature was almost exactly the same everywhere to within a part in 10^5," says Tegmark

"So how could you take something with almost the same temperature everywhere and then make something really hot here and something else really cold? How did that happen?"

The answer, he says, is in two parts. First inflation, this is the mysterious process in which the universe increased its volume by many orders of magnitude in just a fraction of a second. In the process, this magnified any tiny fluctuations that may have existed before inflation. And second gravity, which magnifies any clumpiness by pulling clumps together to form bigger clumps. This eventually forms galaxies, stars, planets and living things like us.

But Tegmark goes on to say that the process of inflation implies that other parts of the Universe that are unobservable to us may have grown from much more uniform parts of the early universe and so be hugely uniform now. And that recent results in string theory hint that the laws of physics may be quite different on those regions.

So the amount of entropy in our part of the Universe is, in a sense, part of the identity of our region. It is a set of coordinates that tell us what part of the universe we are in. "Like a cosmic telephone number" is how Tegmark describes it.

That's an extraordinary idea. But then cosmology is filled with fantastic thinkers with crazy ideas and always has been. If you get a chance to watch the talk, it's easier to digest than the transcript but both are recommended.



Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0904.3931: The Second Law and Cosmology

Comments

Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.