Obviously, there is no physical law governing the directional rotation of a galaxy, per hemisphere, or else they would all be the same.  So all I can really do is laugh at the notion that these geniuses don't seem to understand that they all rotate clockwise if you're on the right side of the galaxy....... But what do I know about the significance of galactic rotational variables...

By AWT observable reality is formed by nested density fluctuations, which have a character of nested foam at large space-time distance scales. We can see these gradients in liposome dispersion or in dark matter streaks. At the case, these density gradients have thick walls, the density gradients formed both sides of these density gradients differs in chirality, so they attract chiral objects on both sides. In addition, at the case of liposome micelles, both sides differ in curvature significantly, so they attract polar molecules differently (a super-hydrophobic effect, well known from lotus leaves). Therefore we can observe a separation of polar D-saccharides and L-proteins on both sides of liposome membranes (L-aminoacids polymers goes inside, being formed by larger/heavier, wheres D-saccharides as a energy mediators goes outside) and the separation of chiral galaxies on both sides of dark matter streaks. It means, the opposite handed galaxies should be attached to the opposite sides of dark matter foamy structures. Outer sides of dark matter attract particles of evaporated antimatter preferably, so they should be reacher to antimatter anihillation signals, which can help to test this hypothesis.

http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2008/11/cp-invariance-violation-and-chirality.html
http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2009/03/is-dark-matter-composed-of-antimatter.html

In this way, AWT explains the segregation of chiral objects on both sides of chiral surfaces of foamy structures by the same mechanism - as a result of force geometry. We can met with this segregation at many places of human society: males and females are chiral creatures in certain aspects by the same way, like bosons and fermions and their homes appear like foam. After then the heavier fermions/females tends to stay inside of foam bubbles, while males tends to move outside, and so on.

It's evident, we are facing a very general and fundamental phenomena here.

By AWT the observable universe is formed by interior of black hole, or at least appear so. After then we can expect two cold spots on opposite sides of skies, as Laura Mersini predicted - it would mean, our black hole exhibits a polar jets and we can see a through them into outer hyperuniverse.

Unfortunately, the second hole is missing, but we know many quasars with one polar jet only. This asymmetry isn't so surprising from AWT perspective, as it's manifestation of CPT violation at the moment, the black hole is finishing with its radiation. But the cold spot may be just a piece of dark matter foam, as being observed along its longer axis, because each black hole should be filled by such foamy structures.

Despite of this it's possible to explain the CMB cold spot simply by presence of another close black hole (i.e. a "parallel universe") and we can see through Einstein-Rosen bridge (a "worm black hole"), which is formed between them. This idea is illustrated here:

http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2008/11/awt-and-vorm-holes.html

The orientation of many galaxies toward cold spot would prefer rather the first two hypothesis, I presume. Of course, we would need a much more independent observations to confirm or refute the large scale structure of Universe - but I do believe, it's just a matter of time.

The above finding illustrates, we can achieve a progress in astronomy not only by increasing of telescope size (a "brute force" approach), but by patient analysis of huge amount of data, i.e. it's a sort of emergent phenomena.

Could there be a universe-scale Coriolis force at work? That not all galaxies are the same handedness in each hemisphere could be explained by other effects (e.g.: gravitation slinging galaxies around through their interactions).

It would be really interesting if the apparent handedness increased with distance.  Could the universe have had a bit of spin to it just as the big bang got underway?

A totally random axial alignment of galaxies within our visible "volume" would, under statistical analysis, yield no significant correlation between position and alignment.

So now we can hypothesize about some extrinsic, i.e., pre-bang(?) rotational component versus intrinsic, i.e., turbulence vorticity (?) influence at some formative point in the past, distrupting that randomness.

The relatively lower strength of the "signal", with right-handed spirals slightly more common in the south, would fit with an overall tendency to assign a precursor "axis", AND imply that our viewpoint is not equatorial, i.e., is slightly offset away from the midpoint along that axis.

Interestingly, if we look far enough out to start getting "signal" from the volume beyond our local "void", we should start to be able to differentiate between pre-bang rotation and post-bang "frozen" vorticity.