Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • ... : Well, I will not like to brand myself as relativist in the sense that we understand the term...
  • ... : Let me put the same question differently...Can galaxy have its own gravitational force? or, Can...
  • ... : Theoretically, what is the difference between a galaxy and a star apart from the fact that galaxy...
  • ZephirAWT : /*..we must rely on all you disciplined and rigorous scientists..*/I wouldn't be so defeatist,...
  • ZephirAWT : IMO time arrow is irreversible, because it's just defined so. Phenomena, which occurs in...
  • Liam : The body of the article claims the possibility of effecting a delta v without a reaction mass,...
  • ... : That's good question. First thing we need to ask is, 'what this 'something is?' If it is...
  • rkomatsu : Question: if quantum superposition (something in two states simultaneously) doesn't exist in...
  • doanwon : I am a lay person also and will try to express my understanding for the purpose of learning. ...
  • ... : Well, well. The limits I have discussed here does not restrict our capabilities as human beings....
  • ammona : I am fascinated to find out more about this.  I'm a non-specialist (a philosopher who's been...
  • Zukunft : As a lay person interested in science, I find that limits are always superseded.......Clearly, as...
  • ... : The article epitomizes the absurdities that seem to be becoming part of scientific exploration....
  • ZephirAWT : In AWT we can distinguish at least two dual perspectives, how to describe the chaotic universe:...
  • ZephirAWT : In fact it's dominated by relativity - only presence (the boundary of which isn't so sharp in...
  • ZephirAWT : This model has a very good meaning in AWT, in which every causal observer would see it's...
  • Mapou : This is the reason that nothing moves in spacetime and why, contrary to the pronouncements of...
  • ericchill : Universe as a Phase Boundary in a Four-Dimensional Euclidean Space by Michael Grady....
  • ZephirAWT : In AWT photons of cosmic microwave background or dark matter streaks are all examples of quantum...
  • richbham : This article published last week by SPIE looks at the current state of nano safety regulation in...
Advertisement
Monday, April 20, 2009

Physicists propose new kind of quantum tunneling

Quantum tunnelling of a new, third kind could finally put string theory to the test

Tunneling is the weird and wonderful process by which a quantum particle passes through a potential barrier that a classical particle could not traverse. It comes about because of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle which gives a finite probability for a quantum particle to cross a barrier of specific height and thickness.

In recent years, physicists have explored the possibility of a second type of tunneling which happens in an entirely different way. This relies on the idea that a quantum particle can change into another quantum particle and back again with a certain probability. The tunnelling occurs when the particle changes from one that interacts strongly with a barrier and so cannot pass though it, into a particle that does not interact with the barrier and so passes through with ease.

For example, quantum particles that change briefly into particles of dark matter should pass through barriers that should otherwise be impassable. This kind of "shining-a-light-through-a-wall" experiment is a serious contender in the search for dark matter.

Now Holger Gies from the Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat in Jena, Germany, and Joerg Jaeckel from Durham University in the UK, are proposing a third kind of tunnelling. In this case, a quantum particle changes into a pair of virtual particles which pass through the barrier and then change back again.

They give the example of photons changing into minicharged particles, particles with tiny fractional electronic charges which are predicted by some forms of string theory. These should pass through mirrors that would otherwise reflect photons, making it seem as if the photons had tunneled through the barrier (which in effect they had).

That's an interesting and potentially important way of testing the predictions of string theory. And there aren't too many of those around.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0904.0609: Tunneling of the 3rd kind


Comments

  • OK..
    ..but how these tunellings differ each other? Is it possible to distinguish them at all? After all, the formation of particle-antiparticle pairs is not specific to any quantum field theory, so it could be used for confirmation of Standard Model as well...
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Zephir_AWT
    04/20/2009
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: OK..
      You're right. The paper does not in particular aim on a test of string theory. They're just claiming that based on this tunneling idea one could design experiments sensitive to physical effects beyond the standard model. Sure, string theory does predict such effects (not sure on which energy scale, though), but basically all other modifications of the standard model also have such predictions (otherwise there would be no point in studying such new theories). The blog's resume is misleading.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      ocram
      04/20/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: OK..
        While theoretical physicists are developing new and new theories tirelessly, they don't care too much about their falsifiability, which becomes problem with increasing number of theories. Here is a very general problem of brilliant and complex formal theories - they're poorly conditioned and their results doesn't differ very much each other. In this way, every theory based on robust logics can beat all quantum field theories in single moment in predictability.

        http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2009/04/does-strings-link-ultracold-with.html

        From above examples is evident, formal approach of contemporary physics has its own objective limits in falsifiability. From AWT follows, an information phase transition based on new nonformal approach/paradigm will become necessary to maintain progress in physics. Formal numeric regressions based on increasing number of postulates and assumptions are simply not enough. Despite of piles of math, we are forced to understand the subject at deeper intuitive level less or more lately.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Zephir_AWT
        04/20/2009
        Posts:9
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.