arXiv blog

Physicists propose new kind of quantum tunneling

Quantum tunnelling of a new, third kind could finally put string theory to the test

kfc 04/20/2009

  • 3 Comments

Tunneling is the weird and wonderful process by which a quantum particle passes through a potential barrier that a classical particle could not traverse. It comes about because of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle which gives a finite probability for a quantum particle to cross a barrier of specific height and thickness.

In recent years, physicists have explored the possibility of a second type of tunneling which happens in an entirely different way. This relies on the idea that a quantum particle can change into another quantum particle and back again with a certain probability. The tunnelling occurs when the particle changes from one that interacts strongly with a barrier and so cannot pass though it, into a particle that does not interact with the barrier and so passes through with ease.

For example, quantum particles that change briefly into particles of dark matter should pass through barriers that should otherwise be impassable. This kind of "shining-a-light-through-a-wall" experiment is a serious contender in the search for dark matter.

Now Holger Gies from the Friedrich-Schiller-Universitat in Jena, Germany, and Joerg Jaeckel from Durham University in the UK, are proposing a third kind of tunnelling. In this case, a quantum particle changes into a pair of virtual particles which pass through the barrier and then change back again.

They give the example of photons changing into minicharged particles, particles with tiny fractional electronic charges which are predicted by some forms of string theory. These should pass through mirrors that would otherwise reflect photons, making it seem as if the photons had tunneled through the barrier (which in effect they had).

That's an interesting and potentially important way of testing the predictions of string theory. And there aren't too many of those around.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0904.0609: Tunneling of the 3rd kind


TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Guest (Zephir_AWT)

  • 1026 Days Ago
  • 04/20/2009

OK..

..but how these tunellings differ each other? Is it possible to distinguish them at all? After all, the formation of particle-antiparticle pairs is not specific to any quantum field theory, so it could be used for confirmation of Standard Model as well...

Reply

ocram

1 Comment

  • 1026 Days Ago
  • 04/20/2009

Re: OK..

You're right. The paper does not in particular aim on a test of string theory. They're just claiming that based on this tunneling idea one could design experiments sensitive to physical effects beyond the standard model. Sure, string theory does predict such effects (not sure on which energy scale, though), but basically all other modifications of the standard model also have such predictions (otherwise there would be no point in studying such new theories). The blog's resume is misleading.

Reply

Guest (Zephir_AWT)

  • 1026 Days Ago
  • 04/20/2009

Re: OK..

While theoretical physicists are developing new and new theories tirelessly, they don't care too much about their falsifiability, which becomes problem with increasing number of theories. Here is a very general problem of brilliant and complex formal theories - they're poorly conditioned and their results doesn't differ very much each other. In this way, every theory based on robust logics can beat all quantum field theories in single moment in predictability.

http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2009/04/does-strings-link-ultracold-with.html

From above examples is evident, formal approach of contemporary physics has its own objective limits in falsifiability. From AWT follows, an information phase transition based on new nonformal approach/paradigm will become necessary to maintain progress in physics. Formal numeric regressions based on increasing number of postulates and assumptions are simply not enough. Despite of piles of math, we are forced to understand the subject at deeper intuitive level less or more lately.

Reply

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement