Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • MattGaucho : 500 Kelvin is less than 450F.  You can reach this temperature in a toaster oven.
  • ... : Thomas Paine gives an accurate synopsis of how science is taught without asking certain questions...
  • fcofbe : Thanks for the tip, norm.  We should have known about the MD5 problem.  We have now added SHA-2...
  • tonyzito : I'm not sure this thing fits the definition of a perfect black body either.  A perfect black body...
  • norm : His predictions are secret documents based on MD5 checksums. MD5 was cracked in 2005, when...
  • Bonobo : "When greedy, immoral, short-term thinking people are involved, there's going to be a crash." ...
  • lasertekk : Thank you Sam.  Let's take that one more step forward.  When greedy, immoral, short-term thinking...
  • ssamd : Here is another way to forecast a crash.  When regulations are striped there will be a crash. ...
  • ... : What bubble in shanghai? For instance,The Economist doesn't think a bubble exists (yet) Analysing...
  • gary7 : Clothes, paper, wood and brick are all non-metallic, easily penetrated by terahertz radiation. I...
  • dan_kolis : As important as this area of inquiry is, it is burdened by being right on the tough love spot...
  • ZephirAWT : Personally, I disagree. In AWT time dimension is defined by direction of gradient of Aether...
  • Fabrizio : Perhaps this quest for an explanation to the arrow of time arises from the same misconception...
  • Mapou : You are 100% correct but you will not get any love from the physics community for saying this....
  • captpaul : The very first question of the paper is flawed and will lead to another Not Even Wrong theory....
  • gemay : The operative phrase is "...fitted to most aircraft."  Since there is no FAA requirement that all...
  • ... : zoroasterisk,That is an amazing statement. First the discussion is about a God who loved and...
  • ZephirAWT : We cannot neglect fact, one half of Universe evaporates and separates by antigravity (radiation...
  • TooMany : Please check into Roman technology; they keep finding more.  The other day I read that the...
  • TooMany : The claimed non-null results sound quite significant, unless the measurements were in the noise.
Advertisement
Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Universe May Not Be "Fine-Tuned" for Life

The chemistry of life may be more robust than we thought against changes in the fundamental laws of physics.

The anthropic principle is the idea that the physical laws that govern our Universe are precisely those that allow complex life like ours to emerge. Many scientists have wondered at the balance of these laws, arguing that any small change would alter the universe so radically that life would be impossible. Why is the Universe so finely tuned for life, they ask.

Nobody has come up with a reasonable answer to this question but today James MacDonald and Dermott Mullan at the University of Delaware argue that matters may be more robust than we thought.

Their argument is about the strong nuclear force. Various physicists have noted that if the strong force were just a little stronger, then protons would bind together more readily. That would mean that soon after the Big Bang, most protons would join together to form diprotons, leaving few if any single protons available to form hydrogen. Consequently, chemistry as we know it would be impossible.

But this reasoning fails to take other factors into account, say MacDonald and Mullan. The biggest factor is that protons and neutrons will always bind more strongly than protons and protons, regardless of the strength of the strong force. So although diprotons would form in this universe, they would also tend to decay into deuterons.

So hydrogen (and deuterium) chemistry would be just as likely in a Universe in which the strong force were stronger. (Of course, how the change would affect the the nucleosynthesis of other elements is another question.)

The work gives the lie to some of the more extraordinary claims regarding the anthropic principle. For example, some argue that since we are unable to find anything special about the combination of laws in our Universe, then maybe any permutation is possible. And if any permutation is possible, then perhaps these combinations exist in countless other universes. Of course, the only one we would experience is the one in which the laws are fine-tuned for our existence.

That's an extraordinary line of argument. But the alternative--that organic chemistry is an emergent property of a wide range of the parameters governing the basic laws of physics--is even more jaw dropping.

MacDonald and Mullan's work gives a tantalising hint that this idea might be worth pursuing a little more diligently.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0904.1807: Big Bang Nucleosynthesis: The Strong Force meets the Weak Anthropic Principle


Comments

  • The strong nuclear force
    There is also another possibility: There is no strong nuclear force! It may just be a hypothetical construct to keep the Standard Model from falling apart (literally). Alternative models may not demand a strong (or weak) nuclear force: http://classicalatom.blogspot.com
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Crackpot
    04/15/2009
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: The strong nuclear force
      The fact, something can be computed in less or more independent way doesn't mean, it doesn't exist at all. For example, the fact we can compute paths of planets by using of geocentric model doesn't mean, planetary forces doesn't exist.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Zephir_AWT
      04/15/2009
      Posts:9
      Avg Rating:
      2/5
    • Re: The strong nuclear force
      I could not agree more with the comment about the strong nuclear force.  My own version of a model of existence, "The Oscillator/Substance Model,"  URL:  http://groups.google.com/group/oscillatorsubstance-theory   does not include either the strong or weak nuclear forces and I agree that both are invented to support the idea that the neutron is a necessary component as such in the nuclei of atoms, one of the several fallacious bases of the Standard Model. The Standard Model "works" for the same reason that the "Geocentric Model of the Solar System works, if on wants to use it.  Make enough assumptions that can be expressed mathematicfally and keep piling on other assumptions to make the first ones closer for a fit to observational fact and you finally get something that will more or less fit "Reality.

      The Standard Model in based on a number of shaky premises. One is the "four forces of nature," one of which, gravitation, can be ignored or so they say.  None of the four forces fit the law of forces.  Electromagnetism and gravitation are observed phenomena which can be described mathematrically, they are not "Forces."  The strong and weak nuclear forces have their basis in the idea that neutrons are present in nuclei per se.  The idea of neutrons in nuclei is attractive but prabably is actually in error.  

      The other, probably fallacious bssis of the Standard Model is the idea that entities produced in atom smashing experiments are fundamental particles, it seems more sensible to consider them as alternate states of matter created by the conditions.  

      As to Quarks, 2/3 and 1/3 pairs...This has an interesting probable fit to the fact that an "inverting, vortex oscillator such as the proton and electron has  two limits and a central "node" thru which it inverts.  This could very well account for the "existence of Quarks."

      Ciaux. Keep thinking "Crackpot. " You hold water quite well.   Dean L. Sinclair
      Rate this comment: 12345

      deanlsinclai...
      04/20/2009
      Posts:1
  • Universe may not be "fine tuned" for life
    Every product of long term evolution would consider its environment "fine tuned" for its life and nothing very strange is about. For example sharks will probably find the deep underwater as quite pleasant environment for their life.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Zephir_AWT
    04/15/2009
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • Who Dun it
    A very interesting study and only as useful as it makes us more able to manage, control and manipulate the universe, which is what life does.
    Physics has been upside down since the day it denied life force as the source of the universe.
    It assumes the universe made life and somehow we think, create, love, and hold values because of protons and electrons.Hahahahaha
     
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Archie
    04/16/2009
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: Who Dun it
      "Why is the Universe so finely tuned for life, they ask. " By God, what a great question!
      Rate this comment: 12345

      z0rr0
      04/16/2009
      Posts:53
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • Fined Tuned Universe
    The universe is finely tuned for Life
    or
    Life is finely tuned for the universe

    Considering the diversity of species that live on our planet from the hottest regions to the coldest I would guess biology is more adaptable to its conditions.

    Using the available data of our universe as a template it would appear that it would remain fairly constant.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jdquarg
    04/20/2009
    Posts:1
  • FTC penalties
    So I don't have a problem with the FTC coming down on false testimonials and claims for paid or privileged endorsements as long as they also come down just as hard on hate mongers and paid or unpaid knockers slagging off good products for insidious reasons. They also should also be made to prove their claims.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Archie
    10/09/2009
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.