arXiv blog

Estimating the orbit of Planet X

If Planet X is out there in the icy reaches of the Solar System, we should see its affect on the orbital motion of the inner planets

kfc 04/14/2009

  • 8 Comments

"Does the Solar System contain undiscovered massive planets or a distant stellar companion of the Sun?" asks Lorenzo Iorio at the Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare in Pisa, Italy.

If it does, then the orbital period of such a body would be so long that any gravitational influence on the known planets can be thought of as a constant, tiny perturbation.

Iorio has looked at a the perihelion precessions of Venus, Earth and Mars in the last century and asked whether there is any indication of such a force in action.

Apparently not, he says, but that doesn't rule out its presence. Instead, it has allowed Iorio to place limits on how far away such a planet might be.

His conclusion is that if Planet X is out there and about the size of Earth, it must more than 130 AU away. If it is the size of Jupiter, it cannot be closer than 886 AU and if it were a brown dwarf with a mass around 80 times that of Jupiter, it would have to be more than 3800 AU away.

Let's get looking!

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0904.1562: Constraints on Planet X and Nemesis from Solar System's Inner Dynamics


TRSF: Read the Best New Science Fiction inspired by today’s emerging technologies.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

qraal

12 Comments

  • 1034 Days Ago
  • 04/14/2009

Ummm... typo?

Hi

The distances you quote as distance limits don't appear anywhere in the paper. In fact you seem out by quite big factors.

Reply

kfc

5 Comments

  • 1034 Days Ago
  • 04/14/2009

Corrected. Thanks!

Reply

Grammarian

2 Comments

  • 1034 Days Ago
  • 04/14/2009

We should see its >>effect<<, not affect. Affect is a verb, effect is a noun.

Reply

djweber

10 Comments

  • 1034 Days Ago
  • 04/14/2009

Re: affect

Both of affect and effect are both nouns and verbs.

http://xkcd.com/326/

http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/affect.html

Reply

Grammarian

2 Comments

  • 1034 Days Ago
  • 04/14/2009

Re: affect

Affect can be used as a noun in psychology. Wrong is still wrong.

Reply

hdginzo

14 Comments

  • 1033 Days Ago
  • 04/15/2009

Re: affect

My dear Grammarian: Why not ‘affect’? One body would make the other to wobble by their mutual closeness, because they would exchange streams of affection in the realm of Cosmic Love and Harmony. Do the terrenal rules of grammar rule in space? I doubt it!

Reply

mbloore

39 Comments

  • 1031 Days Ago
  • 04/17/2009

affect/effect

bodies have an effect (noun) on each other.  bodies affect (verb) each other.

Reply

Advertisement

garylynn

44 Comments

  • 1033 Days Ago
  • 04/15/2009

Nemesis anyone?

Back to the subject of this evening's symposium...has anyone else here read Richard Muller's book "Nemesis"?(http://muller.lbl.gov/pages/lbl-nem.htm)  I noticed the reference to Nemesis in the article, so I assume yes? Their calculated orbit is nominally 1.5 light years across, so 100K AU?
Just wanted to see if you are aware that this is  a well plowed field.  

Reply

Bio

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Subscribe to the arXiv blog RSS Feed

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement