Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • TooMany : While the anti-nuke contingent in the US and in parts of Europe continues to rant about the...
  • mulliguns : Points to why a pair may be the most difficult to row successfully, and that sometimes odd size...
  • shaase : It would seem difficult to guarantee that oarsmen all pull with the same force, so it will still...
  • seth : Even though the new arrangements were not immediately obvious, I do think they make common sense....
  • ... : I have examined the major uranium producing countries and made a forecast for 2009, 2010 and...
  • ZephirAWT : Frankly, I don't believe in communication hypothesis wery much, but there's is at least another...
  • ... : http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/22114/The link above goes to your Technology Review...
  • jmc8888 : Great explanation of an issue that only concerns the idiots. If running out of nuclear fuel was a...
  • spad12 : "Federally insured loans do not reduce the overall cost of projects, they just shift part of the...
  • Siphon : Of course, many things do change with temperature: density of the radioactive material, which...
  • mbelvadi : I wonder if this model takes into account the slow cumulation of very tiny increments of...
  • ZephirAWT : That's OK, it's word consumption (110 thousands tons of uranium concentrate) - enough to next ten...
  • Bob... : 1) "Federally back the loans..."  Federally insured loans do not reduce the overall cost of...
  • tsport100 : What a load of alarmist rubbish this article is. Australia has 1.2 MILLION tonnes of known...
  • ZephirAWT : /*..Uranium is being taken from coal ash waste...*/It isn't - we are only speculating about it...
  • Colonel... : Says this blog: "The combined threats of climate change, energy security and fears over the high...
  • spad12 : "The initial costs (overnight costs) are very large.    Financing the construction effectively...
  • Bob... : "it is cheap after the initial costs (and even then a large portion of the costs is in the form...
  • pasward : Do they?  If you are headed toward a star, being off by 1,000,000 km is still going to get you...
  • spad12 : A: Most of the current estimates brought up on when we will run out of uranium are based on no...
Advertisement
Monday, April 06, 2009

Why ET's genetic code could be just like ours

A new thermodynamic analysis suggests that 10 of life's 20 amino acids must be common throughout the cosmos


One of the great outstanding questions in biology involves the evolution of the genetic code and the fact it relies on 20 amino acids. How did this system evolve and why use 20 amino acids and not some other number? Today, Paul Higgs and Ralph Pudritz at McMaster University in Hamilton, Canada, put forward an answer which has profound implications for the nature of life on other planets.

We know that amino acids are common in our solar system and beyond. Various first experiments to recreate the conditions in the Earth's early atmosphere have produced 10 of the amino acids found in proteins. Curiously, analyses of meteorite samples have found exactly these same 10 amino acids. Various researchers have noted this link but none have explained it.

Now we know why, say Higgs and Pudritz. They have ranked the amino acids found in proteins according to the thermodynamic likelihood of them forming. This turns out to match the observed abundances in meteorites and in early Earth simulations, more or less exactly.

That's a neat piece of work. They go on to argue that the first genetic codes must have evolved to exploit these 10 prebiotic amino acids. The other amino acids which are all bigger and generally more difficult to synthesise must have been incorporated later. At any rate, Nature had settled on the full 20 we see today by the time the earliest common ancestor of all organisms on the planet first emerged, at least 3.5 billion years ago.

Higgs and Pudritz are not the first to suggest that the first genetic code consisted of 10 prebiotic amino acids but all previous arguments have differed in various ways. What's impressive about their argument is that it is underpinned by the powerful theoretical machinery of thermodynamics.

The implications of this are huge. Thermodynamic arguments are as valid on Earth as they are in interstellar gas clouds, where evidence of amino acids has already been seen. What's the betting that these amino acids are the same as the prebiotic 10 that Higgs and Pudritz finger?

These same thermodynamic arguments should also hold on Earth-like planets elsewhere in the cosmos. And if that's the case, then ET may not be so alien after all, as Higgs and Pudritz imply with the extraordinary conclusion to their paper:

"The combined actions of thermodynamics and subsequent natural selection suggest that the genetic code we observe on the Earth today may have significant features in common with life throughout the cosmos."


Wow!

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0904.0402: A thermodynamic Basis for Prebiotic Amino Acid Synthesis and the Nature of the First Genetic Code

Comments

  • ET Spelling Bee
    hay kfc,
      Is that "Kentukie Freid Chikin"? Please subscribe to a spell check. Just one letter off on our genetic code causes pandemonium. If ten Aminos are universal, perhaps the dictionary is also.
    My Bast,
    Hinry  
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Henry1951
    04/06/2009
    Posts:7
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • ET's code NOT like ours
    Our genetic code is written with DNA, not amino acids. An English word can be written in any phonetic alphabet (Hebrew, Korean, Katakana, Arabic - very different codes for the same word). The ET code would have to use the same letters (ATGC) and the same words (codons with 3 letters each) to spell the same amino acids. Is that thermodynamically likely too? Perhaps the looks would be similar, but Clark Kent and Louis Lane would hardly be able to interbreed...
    Rate this comment: 12345

    rkomatsu
    04/09/2009
    Posts:15
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Can't breed
    But we could eat each other, i.e. consume for food.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jim1010100
    04/10/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
Advertisement

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
•  Subscribe
Save 36%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
» Gift Subscription
» Digital Subscription
» Reprints, Back Issues
» Subscribe
» Table of Contents
» MIT News

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.