• 1037 Days Ago
• 04/03/2009

shame really?

just because a warp field is unstable at a certain velocity it does not mean that FTL travel is unattainable.  i would reword this such that: "warp fields are unstable at high rates of velocity and this posses a new challenge", thank you for providing the scientific insight into the stability of FTL travel but must one be such a pessimist? humans have achieved unbelievable feats throughout history, this is just another challenge and we will over come this challenge through research or by chance!

it came to me that research into super cooled semiconductors and magnetism may provide some form of stabilization field for this warp bubble. perhaps someone skilled in quantum mechanics can study the effects of applying such a field to FTL travel?

• 1037 Days Ago
• 04/03/2009

Hawking radiation

I've only skimmed the paper, but it looks like they're analyzing a pure Alcubierre warp rather than Van Den Broek's "double-bubble" (my term) warp.

It's been known that the strong field gradient at the warp boundary is hazardous if matter is encountered (Halt, Held, Hoiland et al.'s 2006 paper) so the possibility of Hawking radiation isn't that much of a surprise; the question is whether it's strictly "within" the bubble (and thus confined to the "shell" of a Broek warp) or not.

The stress-tensor energy instability is another issue, and I hold out hope because it only implies bubble instability. Instability can be overcome by dynamic control of the bubble, provided that the timescale of the control mechanism is shorter than that of fluctations caused by instability.

In other words, there's still room for me to handwave away these problems in my science fiction stories (grin). And in real life, if we ever figure out a way to create a warp in the first place, we may find a way to control the instability (if it indeed exists). Might need a quantum computer, though. ;-)

• 1037 Days Ago
• 04/03/2009

wait a minute

Wouldn't the renormalised stress-energy tensor remain well-behaved if they readjusted the drawn reciprocation dingle arm to reduce side fumbling of the berilium sphere, thus damping the renormalised stress-energy tensor through inverse tachyon hysteresis?

• 1037 Days Ago
• 04/03/2009

Radiation

I can't speak to the math, but isn't the radiation just a matter of ensuring that the spacecraft is adequately shielded?

• 1037 Days Ago
• 04/03/2009

Quantum Solidification

http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/23292/
Of course FTL functions become unstable on a quantum level. They can't be solidified by light, which is a #2. [.]2. And gravity is a wave, ruling light. [.]3. They have to be solidified by [.] alone there, or perhaps [.]5, and ought not fall outside of [.]7. That is basically pulling out of one of the many poons of the world, and not then knowing which one you're going to refuck.

Faster than light, light cannot "possibly" [5] solidify uncertainties.

But light is not the only thing that solidifies possibilities. We will need to understand that if you make an FTL machine, you will also be making an 'interdimensional' machine. You know, like the aliens that the Disclosure Project describes?

"Desire" will come into play. Light is not the only thing that solidifies a quantum. The quantums could also be maintained in some other fashion, or destabilized, contained, and restabilized in another organization if you so choose. Also consider JohnTitor.com.

• 1037 Days Ago
• 04/03/2009

and just below c?

haven't tried to read the paper, but this summary states that the stress tensor for the front wall grows exponentially at superluminal speeds, rendering the bubble unstable.  How would it behave just below lightspeed, and how much energy would it require?

• 1036 Days Ago
• 04/04/2009

Quantum setback for warp drives

Quantum setback for warp drives
Quantum setback for warp drives
When I started with the Quantum, I was instructed that the quantum was an empty space or nothing. Then we heard Dalai Lama talk of Quantum as Yoga and the sprit high away so is the soul floating in the air. However this does not convince me and I ask,” if I am on earth and I breathy and that is living, this is not anything. It is me”. Hence, I gave this for some time only to realise that Quantum was alive with different definition. I agree the failure in this does create a sad tale. It was alive
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla

• 1036 Days Ago
• 04/04/2009

Quantum setback...

I beg to differ.  There is a little known branch of science known as "Subquantum Kinetics". If your interested go to Google And look it up. While you there, Look up Thomas Townsend Brown's work in ElectroGravitcs, From 1959 on...,( note at some point you will find that it becomes "CLASSIFIED" by the US Military). That right boys and girls the US Military has been working on antigravity research since 1959. Also check out Paul A. LaVioette, Ph.D, who wrote books on Subquantum Kinetics. Check out Yevgeny (Eugene) Podkletnov Ph.D,'s work in gravity pulse generators and other Gravity Modification Research. The point to this is... Podkletnov clocked Gravity Pulses at least Sixty Four (64) "TIMES" the speed of Light, and higher. All of the major Aerospace And Aviation Companies have been at this research for over Fifty Years, ( Project Skyvault, the B2 Bomber etc..) Call me crazy...but all of the UFO's in the sky aren't full of little green (gray) men..


P. S. Please don't misunderstand me, the B2 has ElectroGravitics built into it, which creates a gravity well to "assist" in its flight capabilities, through its charged hull, which aids in reducing the sonic shock wave, air friction on the hull, de-friction of enemy radar, etc.. The Military hasn't allowed it to go super-sonic, (the B2 is only rated as sub-sonic), but it could, according to Dr. Paul LaViolette, sorry no vertical take off capabilites, yet!!



Project Skyvault, is research into Microwave propulsion

• 1036 Days Ago
• 04/04/2009

Setback? Really?

Dang, we were so close to figuring out the FTL thing. Now this! But seriously, we are likely hundreds if not thousands of years away (if ever) from technology capable of channeling the energies required for even thinking of this kind of science. These are fun and interesting math and physics thought experiments, but nothing more. Nature will indeed determine what is possible and what is not, and who knows what new and exciting technologies will be possible a thousand years from now.

• 1036 Days Ago
• 04/04/2009

FTL transmission of complex matter structures in three dimensions is practically impossible.  But it is already established fact for individual particle/wave functions.  The phenomenon is supported in Quantum Mechanics as quantum tunneling.  A particle can “tunnel” through the quantum field, the effect of which is that the particle “vanishes” from it’s current position and “reappears” in a different position instantaneously, without ever having traversed the intervening space.  This is possible because at the quantum level, a particle is never actually in a particular place, but exists as a field potential, smeared over an indeterminate range of spacetime.  Hawking radiation is itself a product of quantum-tunneling paired particles at the apparent event horizon of a black hole.  Through quantum tunneling, some particles can “jump” from the inside to the outside of the event horizon boundary, and escape the gravity well. 

The argument is that because INFORMATION cannot be encoded in a on a single random particle, that even though the particle effectively “travels” faster than light, it cannot convey information faster than light.  However Dr Gunter Nimtz and Dr Alfons Stahlhofen, of the University of Koblenz modulated a strong microwave beam with a piece of music by Mozart, and directed the beam at a barrier.  A receptor on the other side of the barrier received a small percentage of the microwave particles, but the signal was sufficient to hear the music clearly.  The particles “jumped” from one side of the barrier to the other instantaneously (as verified by interferometry).  When they jumped, as an aggregate, they retained the information which had been encoded in the dimension of TIME.   So three dimensional structures in space cannot go faster than light, but INFORMATION as a structure encoded in the dimension of TIME can be transmitted faster than light when quantum tunneling is employed.

So, a warp drive that can move a spaceship faster than light is probably impossible.  But “faster than light” transmission of information is possible over short distances under controlled conditions because the matter/energy involved is not actually traversing the intervening space, not really “traveling” faster than light, but merely bypassing spacetime through the quantum field, and hence does not violate  E=MC^2.  Whether this will ever have a practical application is anybody’s guess.

• 1036 Days Ago
• 04/04/2009

Cavemen

How utterly absurd, yet so easily predicted.  This conversation is akin to australopithecines attempting to apprehend computer technology.
The idea that "FTL travel is impossible" is ludicrous in the extreme, since the effect is observed directly through quantum physics.
The only barrier is the ignorance of those attempting the exercise, and unfortunately, modern humanity is married to a "scientific" paradigm that has no basis in the observed universe.
It is only with the assistance of enormous fudge factors that any of our scientific illusions continue to exist.  In fact, there is not a single area of modern science that can actually account for observed phenomena.  
To suggest that we have any real understanding of the problem or potential for solution is a testament to our immense ignorance.

• 1036 Days Ago
• 04/04/2009

Quantum setback...pt2

Quantum tunneling and other such "theories" are fine, but just that ,"theories", in search of actual implementation, (physical proof),  but the work of T.T. Brown and others, "was" and is actually a physical phenomena in search of a theory :). Subquantum Kinetics scientists, would think of Quantum Mechanics a "classical physics" , (something out of date, for the most part), which would put  Einstein , Newton and Hawking on the out side, of the new mainstream of physics, looking in, sorry about that... I don't wish to appear smug, but the books I come across have opened my eyes. Space-time warping just doesn't apply anymore.

• 1036 Days Ago
• 04/04/2009

anyone else check the date?

I must admit, I didn't check the date and retweeted a friend's Twitter post on this one... but, as another friend so kindly pointed out, the original paper was dated "April 1st"... April Fools to all of us, I guess...

• 1036 Days Ago
• 04/04/2009

Linear grasping at the quantum

Tisk Tisk.... such little imagination.... who needs to travel over the surface....when you can phase shift through a dimensional fold.  Never mind terminal velocities the quantum permits us to consider the instantaneous anybody.

• 1035 Days Ago
• 04/05/2009

Just a moment, please!

We can't have the right theories yet. All the matter in the known universe supposedly rode a faster than light expansion of the universe space continuum very soon after the Big Bang, allowing the energy to dissipate, cool, and condense into matter. That expansion of space itself seems to have slowed, but observations indicate that it is now accelerating again – at an ever increasing rate and perhaps leading to an eventual Big Rip. And gravity, well, just doesn't fit. If gravity is composed of "gravitons" or some other particles that convey the apparent force then, pray tell, how do they escape from a Black Hole without, relative to our viewpoint, somehow moving faster than light? Perhaps "quantum tunneling" is trying to tell us something about space that we just haven't found a way to understand yet, and perhaps the answer to it will directly relate to how gravity escapes from a Black Hole in much higher abundance than does anything else, and how space can expand faster than light and not become unstable enough to pop the expansion bubble. When we can explain all these things, and verify them by observation, then we might safely be able to stipulate what is and is not possible within our universe.

• 1035 Days Ago
• 04/05/2009

May I suggest that you losers stop picking over the bones of someone else's hard work? Perhaps set your, clearly, superior intellects to the task of bettering human existence. This is inane.

• 1034 Days Ago
• 04/06/2009

Pissed!

this really pissed some people off didn't it!? What i want to know is how do we know that are theories of quantum mechanics are indeed correct? maybe the math is all misguided? did you ever think that maybe someone could be wrong in assuming the all mighty Einstein was correct?

• 1034 Days Ago
• 04/06/2009

SEVERAL thoughts...

Now that the kids have had a chance to get it out of their systems, and settled down for their naps...

First thought: If we allow claims for this being "the best possible universe, because it's the one where WE are", then there's probably good reason that the loopholes allowing FTL travel are so difficult to track down and make use of -- there is reason to believe that if it were trivial, we would have been (or are due any time now to be) overrun by whoever figured it out first. In which case all we can hope is that the underlying principles of FTL involve certain aspects of "quantum observation" principles, such that any tendency toward immaturity and barbarism gives you reeeally bad "traction" and slows you down. Because otherwise the whole concept of "Benevolent Elder Cultures" becomes a whistling-in-the-dark "denial" and cover-up for "well, actually there's nobody out there, and besides, you cain't get thar from 'ere"...

Second thought: I am a strong proponent for "Better Living through Engineering". Which engenders a tendency to build improved metaphors with which to get a "gut-feel" grasp of what parts of reality can actually be man-handled, wrassled and tamed. One metaphor that jumps out at me involves the assumptions people seem to make about our knowledge of unstressed metrics. Given that almost our entire edifice of "scientific and technical knowledge" has been built up in a gravitationally warped field, here at ground level, I suspect we are "stuck" until we can get "out there a ways" and research what might have been covered up by our "bottom of the gravity well" environment.

Third thought: ever tried to drive on an unfamiliar unpaved road, in the dark, with your lights off?? Did your vehicle survive?? In the absence of any predictive/projective evaluation of the bumps and potholes "ahead", you are forced to survive whatever you encounter, if you can. Given that FTL tends to imply that you are overrunning the conditions "ahead" faster than you can gather information about them, all the metaphors boil down to using a constant stream of smaller FTL devices sent "out and back", and essentially steering a course to follow those which survive conditions ahead as determined by their successful return. Unfortunately. Because what I've just described qualifies as an FTL boomerang "cannon" and the potential for misuse and abuse is beyond huge.

Another thought (I don't think we'll reach any "final thought" for some time, so don't hold your breath): the concept of "ley lines", or some form of "equipotential paths" between distant points -- turns out to be a fairly common "enabler" for FTL in many speculative fictions. Equally common is the requirement for an unstressed metric AND the ability to detect "something" indicating the presence of such a thing.

With any luck, it will turn out that the Alcubierre warp bubble becomes manageable when following one of these hypothetical "warp lines". With even greater luck, we may even find these lines are all over the place, linking between stars, leading places with some POINT in traveling...

Often enough, "luck" consists of adaptively choosing metaphors that happen to match closely enough to reality to reveal what MIGHT be there, to give us a handhold, something to work with.

In any case, it all boils down to: Worried about warp instabilities? Figure out how to detect and avoid the potholes that exceed your stability control limits.

• 1034 Days Ago
• 04/06/2009

Clark, Hawkings, Einstein, others

"Great spirits have often encountered violent opposition from weak minds". Einstein

"As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality". Einstein

- Inventor of Present Day Satellite Technology Arthur C. Clark "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic".


“It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity.”
Albert Einstein


Einstein Archives Online

" Imagination is more important than knowledge. "
- (A. Einstein)

"Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocre minds. The latter cannot understand it when a person does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses their intelligence."
--Albert Einstein


"Today's science fiction is often tomorrow's science fact."
— (Stephen Hawking)


"Long experience has taught me this about the status of mankind with regard to matters requiring thought: the less people know and understand about them, the more positively they attempt to argue concerning them, while on the other hand to know and understand a multitude of things renders men cautious in passing judgment upon anything new."
- (Galileo)


“Once a new technology rolls over you, if you're not part of the steamroller, you're part of the road.”
Stewart Brand

"Risk strategies that proved effective in the past are no longer enough to win today. From our vantage point, we can see that the key to success is not to rely on yesterday's news, but to peer into the future and ask what could happen tomorrow."
-Dr. Ron Dembo, President & CEO, Algorithmics


"Technology cannot be defined in terms of dimensions alone. In fact, it represents a convergence of the traditional disciplines of physics, chemistry and biology at a common research frontier"
- Commissioner Busquin, Joint EC/NSF, Toulouse 2000

And Finally,

It was the late founder of the first private satellite company, Rene Anselmo, who declared, "Truth and technology will triumph over bullshit and bureaucracy."
Rene Anselmo

To say that a few folks working on a mathematical model have defined the future of space travel makes me laugh out load to such illogical lunacy.

• 1034 Days Ago
• 04/06/2009

ur heads in the clouds, let's focus a bit

  Just asked a co-worker of mine "if he would run as fast as possible in a pitch dark room?" he responded with " if i knew the room?" i say " sure," he answers with " well then maybe"; it's the otherwise i'm getting at.  faster than light travel may well be possible. you can juice just-about-any car into high horsepower stats and blister the tarmac. space is cosmic, right? the life and death of planets and we don't have a clue about what else is flying out there.. i.e. huge space amoebas or idk.  it's just important to have maps and charts of what's where and distances before faster-than-light anything, or even a portion of that-speed travel is executed.  just found out about my pragmatic realisms.  thanks for the forum.  oh, warp is similar to a soundwave like breaking the sound barrier.

• 1034 Days Ago
• 04/06/2009

Belief

I can't believe I just read so much hot air and now I'm posting something!(1st time, probably last)

Science is great, theorising, testing, establishing.

But in a universe where particles can simultaneously come in and out of existance, affect each other from opposite sides of the galaxy etc. etc. there is obviously one thing we can say for certain...there are a lot of possibilities!!!

We haven't even got much of a handle on gravity yet and I agree that the opening article presents some real problems that may be solveable or not, try alternative approach.

But all of this aside I still believe in anti gravity and have little doubt in the reality of inter-dimensional travel and existance...see God.

Have fun!

• 1033 Days Ago
• 04/07/2009

hawkings radiation not that much of an issue

Seriously, Hawking's radiation is basically pair production, typically an electron and positron. Both are easily shielded by a strong enough electromagnetic field, and if you have the power to warp space you definitely have the power to create a electromagnetic shield strong enough to protect a starship. Now the instabilities, once we know what those are, can be dealt with.

• 1025 Days Ago
• 04/15/2009

Trying to use today's knowledge to figure out future technologies?

Why do people keep trying to figure out future technology based on today's understanding of science, etc? There is an infinite future in front of us and many many new things will be learned and technologies developed. Trying to figure out the exact how and why of something as advanced as warp propulsion when we still have such scant knowledge of the universe and all it's workings is ludicrous. Just because this version of a theory has problems doesn't mean, with new knowledge and tools, something else won't be worked out. Don't bury this idea just yet. We still have a lot to learn!

• 1022 Days Ago
• 04/18/2009

Quantum setback pt3

Have you ever heard of a MicroWave Conjugation Drive, no !?!. Well the US Military has contracts with two Universities plus most, if not all, of the AeroSpace and
Electronic companies since 1947. Does "1947" ring a bell, no ?!? Hint: New Mexico. I thought it was only a myth too.

  Well this is how it works, at least as far as I understand it. They shoot a 2 gigahertz ,or higher, broad pulse microwave "probe" beam through a conjugation device, to a target, in this case the ground under the "craft",  the beam may scatter, but even if the slightest part of that "probe" beam returns to the device it enters the "mixer" which locks onto the area where the probe beam came from and set up a resonance pulse. Now the "pump" pulse continues to build the resonance pulse in intensity until it becomes a "soliton" pulse which in turn creates a very strong negative bias between to "craft" and the ground and repels the two away form each other, and poof "levitation". Its self sustaining, and it uses about 1/tenth the energy of a fighter jet of equal size.

Now take that and combine it with the "electrogravitc" drive, discuss earlier, and Alfa Centaury here we come. No, not in two hundred year, or even 4.2 years ( light speed), try 5 days maybe a week if you stop to do some sightseeing, lol. I think we have two space programs, NASA, which "seems" to stumble along doing the same old crap and a Deep Black Space Program, that's doing all that "Star Trek" like stuff. Think that I'm full of "it", well maybe, but then again maybe not. So you can keep all of your quaint notions about "Quantum Mechanics" and "space warping drives" if you like, but I think "Subquantum Kinetics", RULES.

• 1004 Days Ago
• 05/06/2009

Anything is possible, be optomistic!

Why Undecidability is Too Important to be Left to Gödel  8

• 987 Days Ago
• 05/23/2009

What does that make life?

So if we can't achieve faster than light travel, then what is life on Earth? Just some random occurrence-a hiccup in nature- that will never amount to anything? If we cannot attain FTL, humanity will eventually be destroyed by some disaster or other, and different lifeforms will become dominant on Earth. They will then be wiped out, and the vicious cycle in this so-called "beautiful universe" will continue.

So, in rejecting the concept of FTL travel you are condemning humanity to a worthless, pitiful existence, trapped on a single speck in the vastness of the universe, unable to grow and improve. Its people like you that keep civilization from advancing. Absolutely disgusting.  

• 761 Days Ago
• 01/04/2010

FTL travel possible, sorta

It should be possible to move faster than the speed of light in a vacuum.  If you set your jet pack for the center of a ten billion solar mass black hole, when you get near the center, and you're immortal so you don't die or get pulled apart and your jet pack is totally indestructible, then it'll be your speed plus speed caused by acceleration of black hole, which could very well be higher than c.  However, this doesn't mean you can escape the event horizon.  As soon as you try to move away from the singularity, that acceleration will be negative (against you).  In other words, if you free fall from an airplane and then reach 500 mph or whatever, then turn on a jet pack and go up, you won't be going up at the rate you were falling down. In fact, I think you'd have to be going on the jet pack at a speed higher than the one you were going down, otherwise you'd still be falling, but not as fast.