First rule of ant traffic: no overtaking
Ever seen an ant traffic jam? Researchers studying ant traffic are beginning to understand why
kfc 03/19/2009
- 24 Comments

In exploring their environment, ants create huge trail systems like motorway networks. Many researchers have remarked that we may have much to learn from the way ant traffic flows along these trails which seem to be free of the jams that plague our roads. After all, it's quite possible that evolution has somehow optimised ant traffic.
But most studies so far have concentrated on two way traffic in which head on encounters between ants dominate the dynamics. We looked at one such study of bidirectional ant traffic not so long ago.
But what of one way traffic? Physicists and motorists alike have long puzzled over the tremendous complexity of behaviour that emerges in one way traffic flow. Who hasn't been stuck in a jam with no apparent cause and that suddenly evaporates for no obvious reason?
Physicists have long known that these effects are closely linked to the density of traffic. Below some traffic density threshold, the flow is always smooth; but creep above this limit and all kinds of traffic chaos ensues.
Now Alexander John at the University of Cologne in Germany and few mates have studied the traffic flow along trails made by Leptogenys processionalis, a more or less average species of ant.
And what they found is quite extraordinary: the average speed of the ants remains constant, regardless of the density of the traffic. There is no transition to a nonlinear flow, at least not in the conditions that this group studied.
Let's put that in perspective. Ant traffic flow is like rush hour traffic on the New Jersey Turnpike travelling bumper-to bumper at the 55 mph.
So what's the secret? John and his mates aren't entirely sure but they've found a pretty good clue: ants never overtake. Not ever. Instead they form into platoons in which all the ants move at the same speed. Increase the density of ant traffic and the platoons simply join together to form larger groups. This is how the velocity remains the same while the density increases. That makes ant traffic significantly different from other types of traffic in which congestion occurs, such as road traffic and internet packet traffic.
That's neat but how have ants hit on this congestion-free solution? Almost certainly through the process of evolution which may well have selected for ants that use the most efficient transport systems.
There's a lesson for traffic planners there, somewhere.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0903.2717: Traffic-like Collective Movement of Ants on Trails: Absence of Jammed Phase



dmm
270 Comments
Humans are doing this?
A few years ago I read about a European country (Netherlands?) that purposefully implemented this "bunching" algorithm during the height of their seashore traffic season. The police would get a group of cars together and would gradually ramp up their speed. Nobody was allowed to pass anyone else; nobody was allowed to lag. The "traffic waves" would move steadily along at >100 kph on roads that normally had been totally clogged with traffic. The throughput, measured in cars per hour, was much larger than the normal unmanaged situation.
Can anyone verify/debunk this? I can't find anything with Google. Either the collective human memory is still better than Google, or else my memory is quite inventive.
Reply
bildan
39 Comments
Re: Humans are doing this?
I would suggest that ants are much better at estimating the range to the next and since they are all nearly the same size and they can therefore space themselves accurately.
A small percentage of humans are terrible at estimating distance. In traffic, they will accelerate until the car in front of them fills the windshield and then brake hard until a 'big' gap appears and go on to do it again. This sets up the 'compression waves' seen in one-way traffic.
The MIT folks could do something about this. Make a heads-up windshield display that shows a virtual line across the road in front of the driver corresponding to a 2 second following distance. The drive would then find it easy to place that virtual line under the rear bumper of the car in from for an exact 2- second following interval.
Of course, I know that active cruise control does this automatically and the HUD would just make it possible to do the same thing manually. But, sometimes traffic is easier to manage manually.
Reply
dmm
270 Comments
Re: Humans are doing this?
"A small percentage of humans are terrible at estimating distance. In traffic, they will accelerate until the car in front of them fills the windshield and then brake hard until a 'big' gap appears and go on to do it again."
LOL, you are so right, at least about the behavior! I wonder, though, if the problem is estimating distance. I don't have 3D vision, but do not have a problem following the car in front at a fixed distance. I would more readily attribute this problem to stupidity, or failure to pay attention. If either of these is the true origin, then nothing short of autopilot will solve the problem.
Reply
bildan
39 Comments
Re: Humans are doing this?
I don't know, my ex drove her car through the back wall of the garage twice, over the mailbox three times, then there was her bosses Mercedes....
I read that small cars are rear ended at a significantly higher rate - presumably by people who judge distance by the size of the car in their windshields.
You've probably noticed people stopping several car lengths from the car in front of them at stoplights and then slowly creeping forward. They simply can't judge distance or where their car will stop so they 'pad' their stopping distance.
These people need all the technical help they can get. We've already given then self parking cars and 'smart' cruise control. I'm sure they'll be first in line to buy robotic, driverless cars - at least I hope so.
Reply
justahick
19 Comments
Re: Humans are doing this?
When the dipwad behind me has been within one wingspan away from my car's rear bumper while driving at normal speeds, I gradually slow down well before reaching anywhere near the car stopped ahead of me, to help prevent a chain-reaction collision. Just my way of forcing them to drive safer for everyone else's sake.
I was wondering how closely you were following the drivers whose stopping annoyed you.
Reply
bildan
39 Comments
Re: Humans are doing this?
I NEVER tailgate. I've practiced until I can hold an exact 2 seconds interval.
The people I'm talking about couldn't see the car behind them anyway - their mirrors aren't adjusted properly. (If I can't see their face, they can's see mine.)
Reply
Jim20e
2 Comments
Re: Humans are doing this?
Of course! But forget identifying the problem as "poor estimation of distance". Instead, appeal to human emotions. Instill the thought that every time we touch the brakes, we have wasted gas from accelerating a few moments earlier. Yes, that may be ineffective with spendthrifts. But as gasoline prices increase - and they will - it is logic that can penetrate human emotion.
The practice of avoiding, in advance, the necessity to touch the brakes continually teaches us to anticipate speed and distance. A reward in our pocketbooks is always good incentive.
Reply
bildan
39 Comments
Re: Humans are doing this?
Right! What about a noisemaker wired to the brake light that sounds a "Ka-ching! like a cash register every time the driver hits the brakes.
I've done accident investigations on both aviation and automotive crashes. I can assure you that 99.9% of them are human error as politically incorrect as that sounds.
Humans are always the weak link or as the WWII saying went, "The primary cause of accidents is the loose nut on the controls."
Reply
covidiu
1 Comment
Re: Humans are doing this?
@dmm: I've never seen this in the Netherlands, but I can confirm that the Romanian police (!!!) sometimes does this between Brasov and Bucharest. They police car will lead a column of cars at about 10km/h *above* the legal limit and it won't allow any overtaking. And once they get to Bucharest they'd turn around and do the same thing in the opposite direction.
Reply
jandockx
1 Comment
Re: Humans are doing this?
I can confirm that this is the way we do things in Belgium on peek days in the holiday season, when many people try to visit the coast. It is called "blokrijden" (i.e., "block driving"). The speed however is lower, if I'm not mistaken between 80kmh and 90kmh. I can only find Dutch links through a Google search though.
Reply