Spatiotemporal Features Of Human Mobility

Prime Numbers, Quantum Field Theory And The Goldbach Conjecture

Gerbert Of Aurillac: Astronomy And Geometry In Tenth Century Europe

A Multiple Of 12 For Avogadro

The Direction of Gravity

Among the most impressive transportation networks on the planet are the complex trails that ants create around their nests. These networks arise through the ants' exploration of their environment and end up channelling the distribution of food for the colony and the daily movements hundreds of thousands of individuals.

What's more, these networks aren't just a random criss-crossing of space. Instead, they are a highly efficient solutions to the problem of searching and transporting food. Various groups have created ant-like foraging algorithms to do other types of virtual exploration.  

One question that has fascinated biologists is how ants build these networks. They've known for some time that ants leave small deposits of pheromones as they travel and that other ants follow these trails, leaving their own deposits. This increases the concentration of the pheromone, strengthening the trail. 

But the precise algorithm that governs the way ants respond to pheromones has been harder to pin down. Many experiments show that a trail can only be reinforced if ants have a disproportionately higher probability to follow a  trail with higher pheromone concentration.  

Biologists have always assumed that this disproportionate response means ants must have a non-linear response to the chemical. In other words, an ant's tendency to turn towards a pheromone deposit is related in a non-linear fashion to the concentration.

But that seems to conflict with one of the great triumphs of experimental biology--Weber's Law, which relates the perceived intensity of a stimulus to its physical magnitude. Biologists know this holds for the human perception of many stimuli, such as the intensity of sound, and have also verified it in many insects. So why not in ants?

Today, Andrea Perna at the Complex Systems Institute of Paris Ile de France and a few pals, resolve the issue. These guys have developed an entirely new way to image pheromone trails which allows them to study ant response to pheromones in more detail than ever before. 

They say the structure of ant trails can be entirely explained if the ants's response to a pheromone droplet concentration is linear. "One ant will turn to the left in proportion to the difference between the pheromone it has on its left side and the pheromone on its right," say Perna and co.

They also point out that this is exactly what Weber's law predicts.

So where does the non-linearity required to create trails come from? Perna and co say that ant behaviour is inevitably noisy.  "We show that the required non-linearity does not reside in the perceptual response of the ants, but in the noise associated with their movement," they say.

That's a fascinating result because it reveals how complexity in nature forms with the simplest of inputs. 

And it clearly has implications for the study of other complex structures that ants create, such as their nests. Just how ants create these huge vibrant structures has long puzzled biologists. 

Perna and friends hint at an answer in their conclusion. "We can imagine that other collective phenomena, such as group decision-making, could also be founded on coupling between Weber’s Law and simple feedback mechanisms."

In the case of nests, this mechanism would have to operate in three dimensions rather than two. But that shouldn't be too much of a challenge. Perhaps a problem that a relatively simple computer model could help solve.    

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1201.5827 :Individual Rules For Trail Pattern Formation In Argentine Ants (Linepithema Humile)

Neutrinos are peculiar particles. They have little mass, no charge and come in three flavours. These flavours are not fixed. The strange thing about neutrinos is that once created, they change from one flavour to another as they travel. 

For a long time, that puzzled physicists. A neutrino's variety determines how it interacts with matter. Physicists built experiments to detect  the flavour coming out of the Sun only to find far fewer than they expected. 

In 2001, that mystery was solved when they discovered that the missing neutrinos had flipped, or oscillated from one flavour to another, during their journey from the Sun to the Earth.  

Since then physicists have scrambled to understand neutrino oscillations in more detail. It turns out that the effect is sensitive to the distance that the neutrinos have travelled and also to the amount of matter the particles have passed through.  

That's given Carlos Arguelles and pals at the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru in Lima an idea. These guys say that  neutrino oscillations ought to be sensitive to changes in the density of the Earth. 

So the oscillations in a beam of neutrinos created at one point on the Earth and beamed through the crust to another point, ought to reveal information about any change in density along the way.  

These guys aren't the first to suggest that a neutrinos beam can effectively x-ray the Earth. But they are the first to explore the size and shape of the density changes that ought to be visible using this method. 

They say the technique ought to be able to spot cavities some 200 km across or larger filled with water,  iron-based minerals or even regions of charge accumulations. They suggest that this might take as little as 3 months.

That's interesting because some seismologists suggest that earthquakes lead to the accumulation of charge in specific volumes of rock, so the technique might be useful for studying this. 

But there's a more significant factor driving interest in this work. This technique could also reveal geological formations likely to contain oil and so could attract considerable commercial investment.   

One important question, however, is whether Arguelles and co have made realistic assumptions in their model. One problem they face is that the beam of neutrinos must be intense enough to produce a result in a reasonable period of time--certainly less than 18 months. 

To achieve this, Arguelle and co have to assume that it is possible to create beams at a rate some 5000 times higher than is achievable today.

Since it's not at all clear how this could be done, that's a big fly in the ointment. 

So while this technique looks possible in theory, this kind of assumption places a big question mark over whether it will be possible in practice in the foreseeable future.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1201.6080 : Searching For Cavities Of Various Densities In The Earth’s Crust With A Low-Energy ν¯e β-Beam