The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
The reborn Adobe Acrobat 8 lets users collaborate with the greatest of ease.
Fair enough. PDF is indeed useful when it's important to capture the look and feel of a print document; in fact, I'm a loyal customer of Octavo, a company founded by Adobe's former CEO John Warnock that scans rare books and publishes them in stunning, high-resolution PDF form. But working with print documents is no longer personal computing's killer app. The Web is. And compared with most Web pages, PDFs feel sadly static and fossilized.
But now something has happened to make me take a fresh look at PDF and Acrobat. In a nutshell: Adobe Systems has discovered social computing.
Over the past few years, the Web has grown from a one-to-many medium, in which authors essentially published documents for the benefit of an unseen audience, into a tool for advanced one-to-one and group communication. Technologies such as social networking, media sharing, voice calling, and video conferencing have transformed the Internet into a locus for all things social, as exemplified by sites like MySpace, Flickr, Skype, Meetup, Upcoming.org, YouTube, and Dodgeball (see "Social Machines," August 2005). With the Acrobat 8 suite, released in November, Adobe has moved decisively into the social-computing era.
I've spent the past few days testing Acrobat 8 and an associated Web service, Acrobat Connect. I'm pleasantly surprised by the number of new features Adobe has provided to help people work together on documents over the Internet--even if those documents aren't PDFs. When combined, Acrobat 8 and Acrobat Connect form a powerful (and potentially cheaper) alternative to established collaboration and presentation systems such as WebEx and Microsoft's Live Meeting and Office Groove 2007. They also show how Adobe is beginning to benefit from its 2005 acquisition of Macromedia, the company that founded the interactive-multimedia industry.
Veteran Acrobat users needn't worry that they'll lose anything. Acrobat 8 includes all of the core functions of Acrobat 7, including the ability to create, review, search, encrypt, and export PDF documents, and to convert other kinds of documents, such as e-mails, Web pages, and Word files, into PDFs. (I tested Acrobat 8 Professional, which retails at $449. Acrobat 8 Standard, at $299, leaves out a few specialized features, such as the ability to work with CAD documents and create fillable PDF forms. Adobe Reader 8.0, the latest version of the company's stripped-down PDF viewer, is still a free download.)
It's the new collaboration features, however, that have me rethinking my negative attitude toward Acrobat and PDF. The features change PDF files--which I'd always seen as the electronic equivalent of museum cases, preserving sacred, untouchable text--into living documents that any number of people can alter, either separately or in concert.
For instance, Acrobat 8 allows users to create blank PDFs and add text by typing, just the way one would with a new Word file. That's a major shift in itself; it means PDF can be a document's "native" format, not just a way to package material created using other applications.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
arneevertsson
2 Comments
Wiki
Even with all those new collaboration features, does PDF stand any chance against the simplest of wikis?
Reply
Monsterboy
92 Comments
Re: Wiki
It does as long as it keeps its formatting, layout and printing features.
Reply
desolation0
13 Comments
Re: Wiki
The simplest of wikis is just that, simple. Getting all of the features together, the ability to collaborate as opposed to just editing and trying to explain why later, makes conferencing much preferable in many environments.
Reply
slocum002
1 Comment
Re: Wiki
Of course, "simple" also means that we already know how to work wikis. And wikis are as far as most of us will actually get.
Reply