Biomedicine

A 'Kill Switch' for Rogue Microbes

A new type of genetic switch gives bioengineers better control over microbes.

  • Friday, August 20, 2010
  • By Katherine Bourzac

Biologists often speak of switching genes on and off to give microbes new abilities--like producing biofuels or drugs, or gobbling up environmental toxins. For the most part, though, it's nearly impossible to turn off a gene without deleting it (which means you can't turn it on again). This limits biologists' ability to control how much of a particular protein a microbe produces. It also restricts bioengineers' ability to design new microbes.

Kill switch: From top left to bottom right, these images show bacteria dying over the course of a few minutes. Researchers flip a genetic switch that causes the bacteria to make proteins that cause them to burst.
PNAS

Now researchers at Boston University, led by biomedical engineering professor James Collins, have developed a highly tunable genetic "switch" that offers a greater degree of control over microbes. It makes it possible to stop the production of a protein and restart it again. The switch, which could be used to control any gene, can also act as a "dimmer switch" to finely tune how much protein a microbe would produce over time.

The researchers made a highly effective microbe "kill switch" to demonstrate the precision of the approach. For years, researchers have been trying to develop these self-destruction mechanisms to allay concerns that genetically engineered microbes might prove impossible to eradicate once they've outlived their usefulness. But previous kill switches haven't offered tight enough control to pass governmental regulatory muster because it was difficult to make it turn on in all the cells in a population at the same time.

The field of synthetic biology involves redesigning networks of genes to enable microbes to perform useful functions efficiently. An example of such a function would be the production of a protein that leads to a desired end product, such as a fuel or a drug. But it's hard for bioengineers to control how a cell will use the gene it's given, and this makes it difficult to control the organisms en masse. A community of cells inside a biofuel reactor, for example, won't behave uniformly, even if the cells are genetically identical clones.

Advertisement

"You're trying to regulate an entire population [of microbes]," says Dan Robinson, senior vice president of biological sciences at Joule Unlimited, a company designing microbes that convert sunlight into fuels. (Joule was not involved with the research, but Collins is a scientific advisor to the company.)

Collins's switch, described online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, turns a modified gene on and off. The switch is created by sequences of DNA that can be added to any gene that a bioengineer wants to regulate. When the cell takes the first step toward expressing that gene--making an intermediate molecule of RNA that can be "read" to make the relevant protein--it also creates the RNA switch. When the first, "off" RNA switch is made, it latches onto the ribosome, preventing it from making a particular protein. When the second, "on" switch is made, it pulls the first RNA switch off of the ribosome and binds to it the switch, freeing the ribosome to resume production.\

Print

Related Articles

Making Industrial Bugs Work Harder

A new technology aims to keep microorganisms that make chemicals alive longer.

Rubber from Microbes

A plant enzyme improves the yield of renewable rubber made by bacteria.

Fuel from Coal-Eating Microbes

A process for converting coal into natural gas could help reduce emissions.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Shine

22 Comments

  • 537 Days Ago
  • 08/20/2010

A 'Kill Switch' for Rogue Microbes

What if the gene suffers a mutation?

I guess it could be engineered to be complex enough that a single mutation doesn't knock off the kill switch trait.

Reply

Netizen

131 Comments

  • 537 Days Ago
  • 08/20/2010

Kill Switches Gone Wild

A similar article may appear in BioScience Magazine's November 2030 issue which reads in part: "Kill switch: From top left to bottom right, these images show human cells dying over the course of a few minutes. Researchers flip a genetic switch, programmed with the criminal's DNA on record, that causes the body's cells to make proteins that cause them to burst. Government regulators are proceeding with caution due to failed unauthorized field tests in the Washington D.C. area 10 years earlier, that resulted in thousands of casualties near Sky Metro."

"'You're trying to regulate an entire population [of microbes],' says Dave Swanson, senior vice president of biological sciences ... Swanson's switch, described online in the Proceedings of the National Academy, turns a modified gene that matches a criminal's genome on and off ... The ethics and risks of operating the kill switch as a last resort in a densely populated area, targeted to an escaped felon, are now a topic of debate in Congress ... The Pentagon has recently acquired a license from the patent manufacturer to begin field tests in the Middle East, as tensions escalate ..."

Reply

RAWnHDG

1 Comment

  • 537 Days Ago
  • 08/20/2010

Re: Kill Switches Gone Wild

I love this 2030 article, but what kind of a criminal mind would even think this?  Amazing.  I was think more along the lines of a 2030 article showing how genetic engineering worked in the new biofoods allowing the control of gene expression in the food products to be based on the needs of the individual who ate that specific bioengineered food product.

Reply

M. Report

9 Comments

  • 534 Days Ago
  • 08/23/2010

Re: Kill Switches Gone Wild

Disease causing bacteria are becoming resistant
to all antibiotics, by natural selection.

It is possible _now_ to build the Smallpox virus
from scratch.

By 2030 it will be possible to build
a Plague bacterium immune to all antibiotics;
A nanotech delivery system for a 'Kill Switch'
lethal to all single celled organisms had best
be in the medical inventory before then.

Reply

jrmatthews98

1 Comment

  • 530 Days Ago
  • 08/27/2010

This is all a bad dream

This stuff will not work.  Apparently these guys have forgotten their Darwin.  Life evolves and changes and these will not work.

Already, it's been tracked, there are genetically modified species growing in the wild screwing around with our ecosystem.

When will the mad scientists stop and realize they can't control nature.

I'm all for progess, innovation, etc., but this is science out of control.  Genetic engineering needs to stop, even though it probably won't.

Disaster will come one day, and the genetic engineers will be to blame.  (reference Black Swans, Chernobyl, 3 mile island, Gulf oil disaster, invasive species, etc. etc. etc.)

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Zynga

HTC

Square

Cellular Dynamics International

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement