The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Courtesy of Tony Alter
The weight-loss results have been modest, but the new compound appears to be safer than previous drugs.
A novel compound called Lorcaserin helped overweight and obese people lose about 5 percent of their body weight, according to a study published today in the New England Journal of Medicine. While the weight reduction is modest, the drug could have fewer side effects than others that appear to be more effective.
The drug, developed by San Diego-based Arena Pharmaceuticals, acts on a specific subset of receptors for the chemical messenger serotonin. These receptors play a role in satiety, the feeling of fullness.
The company has been working to develop such a compound since the 1990s, when research linked appetite to some serotonin receptors in the brain. "This is the first tailor-made molecule to target receptors involved in producing satiety and reducing caloric intake," says Arne Astrup, a physician at the University of Copenhagen, who wrote an editorial accompanying the paper in the NEJM. "I think we now have a much better understanding of the biology of these systems working in the brain and the peripheral effects than we did when some of the first compounds came on market. I think we feel more confident that this is a safe drug."
Several weight-loss drugs have been pulled from the market or abandoned in late-stage development because of dangerous side effects. Long-term safety is a major concern, since previous studies suggest that in many cases such drugs must be taken continuously to maintain weight loss. "Weight-loss drugs only work as long as you take them," says Steven Smith, a physician at Florida Hospital in Winter Park, FL, who led the study and is a paid consultant to Arena. "They are more like cholesterol or blood-pressure drugs than antibiotics, which cure an infection and can then be stopped."
Lorcaserin was designed to target a subset of serotonin receptors called 5-HTC2. This specificity is in contrast to that of fenfluramine, a weight-loss drug often prescribed in the 1990s in combination with a second drug called phentermine (the combination was known as fen-phen). Fenfluramine was pulled off the market in 1997 after it was linked to heart-valve problems and pulmonary hypertension. These side effects were thought to come from the drug's action on a set of serotonin receptors, 5-HT2B, found on heart and lung cells. By targeting brain receptors specifically, Lorcaserin appears to avoid these side effects.
In the new study, funded by Arena, scientists studied more than 3,000 people; half were given the drug, half took a placebo. After a year, approximately 55 percent of the drug group and 44 percent of the placebo group remained in the trial. Nearly 50 percent of the Lorcaserin group lost 5 percent of their body weight, compared to about 20 percent of the placebo group. About 20 percent of the drug group lost 10 percent of their body weight, compared to 7 percent of the placebo group. (Weight loss of about 10 percent is linked to decreases in cholesterol level and blood sugar.) Those who took the drug for a second year were more likely to maintain their weight loss; nearly 70 percent did so, compared to about half of those given a placebo in the second year.
Make junk food expensive, and the obesity problem will go away
Obesity is caused by high-calorie non-satiating and non-satisfying foods, which just taste good but satisfy no other metabolic needs. This of course leads to more food craving, which then degenerates into full-blown food addiction.
We unfortunately subsidize these food production chains, while the healthy foods are rarely subsidized. A hamburger probably costs half of what its real price is.
Just reverse the incentives to fix obesity. Make a hamburger cost $10, by removing all subsidies, and by adding on a steep tax as well. Same thing for sodas, and all the other junk foods.
If a bag of potato chips were to cost $10, people would think twice before wolfing it down.
No pills required.
Re: Make junk food expensive, and the obesity problem will go away
And if that doesn't work, we still have exercise and liposuction as alternatives.
Re: Make junk food expensive, and the obesity problem will go away
Yes, that would work!
Just like it did with cigarettes. The logic is that if we endlessly raise taxes on cigarettes people will stop. But a huge chunk of the population still smokes.
And the side affect is similar to that of prohibition: the mafia got involved due to large profit to be made smuggling cigarettes.
So you're proposing we have a 'Potato Chip Mafia' or a 'Junk Food Mafia'. Pssst... (guy in trench coat approaches you in a seedy parking log of a bad section of town) "wanna buy some Pringles?"..
"The first one is free..." .. "betcha can't eat just one!"
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
wctopp
64 Comments
side effects
I'd bet that any drug that monkeys with our appetite is going to have psychological side effects. One of the primary reasons we have this huge brain is to make us efficient feeding ourselves. I don't believe we know the reason we're all obese. It has to stop, of course, but until we understand why I think we're going to get into emotional/psychological trouble with drugs that try to block it.
Reply