The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
(Page 2 of 2)
David Altshuler, a geneticist at the Broad Institute, in Cambridge, MA, cautions that the findings need to be repeated, because the study groups and the control groups were drawn from two different populations, increasing risk for detecting genetic differences not linked to longevity. "The authors were very careful in their analysis to address these points, but it will nonetheless be important for independent investigators to confirm the results," he says.
Scientists haven't yet looked in detail at the genes implicated in the research; the microarrays used in these studies spotted genetic markers near genes, not the genes themselves. The next step will be to sequence some of the candidate genes in order to figure out what the longevity-linked variants do.
The study did highlight some genes previously associated with longevity, such as a protein involved in cholesterol metabolism and tied to relative risk of Alzheimer's, as well as genes linked to chromosomal instability and the insulin pathway. "A lot of the genes have no function associated with them as of yet," says Perls. "We will begin looking at genetic databases to figure out what pathways these genes point toward and maybe start to look at some animal models."
The researchers caution that the study was limited to people of European descent. "We have to do these investigations all over again for different ethnicities and maybe different environments as well," says Perls. "If you're up in Greenland, it probably takes a whole different set of genetic variations to survive in that environment than in Arizona." His team is already working with a group in Japan that is studying a group of Japanese centenarians.
The findings also raise the possibility of developing a genetic test to predict an individual's chances of living past 100. But the scientists caution against use of this type of test, at least in the near term. "I think from a social point of view, it's not ready for prime time. A lot more study has to be done in terms of what physicians can do for people with the results of this test," says Perls. "If someone has tons of longevity marks, I start to worry about what insurance companies and others would do."
However, people who have already had their genomes analyzed, through services such as 23andMe, will soon be able to predict their risk score through a free website that Perls' collaborator is developing. But Perls hopes to head off commercial efforts to market this kind of test. "We are concerned that the marketing [for such a test] will not mention the shortcomings of the test," says Perls.
"My hope has always been that we would learn much more about how to get lots of people to live to older ages in good health and delay the onset of disease to the end of life," says Perls. "I do not think this will lead to a treatment that will get people to become centenarians, but rather make a dent in diseases like Alzheimer's."
It'd be neat if genetic testing companies companies like "23andMe" or others tested for these genetic signatures.
Would you want to know, though?
What if you don't have these genes and you are in the genetic group that is expected to die younger...?
My 2 cents is that one should know, even if the news are bad.
It would help with estate planning, life insurance, stuff like that. After all, our lives are not only about ourselves, but also about the people who immediately surround us.
PS - just keep that info out of the hands of insurers...
Too early definitive conclusion !!
All arguments above are sound,comforming
to critical experimental paradigms
that must not be ignored,specifically,
1) were study subjects selected strictly
from American society? If yes,what is
the likely research implication?
2) Is this genetic signature pointing to
longevity promoting genes distribution
variant in humans?
3) what are impacting role plays of society
and human activities as it affects healthy
age controlling genes in humans.
Whereas the work conveys enormous implications,
conclusions at this time might
be considered hasty.
Martin Atayo
(Technologist)
Washington, DC
Re: Too early definitive conclusion !!
From the end of the article, the answer to your questions:
The researchers caution that the study was limited to people of European descent. "We have to do these investigations all over again for different ethnicities and maybe different environments as well," says Perls. "If you're up in Greenland, it probably takes a whole different set of genetic variations to survive in that environment than in Arizona." His team is already working with a group in Japan that is studying a group of Japanese centenarians.
When you are actively involved in life you will usually increase your longevity. An inactive participant, a person who is simply alive, will probably not live very long. For many people whose jobs were the most important aspect of life, retirement may lead to death soon after. Those who have hobbies, a vibrant family life or friendships, and/or other personal interests are more likely to live longer.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
gabrielg01
450 Comments
Anti aging drugs will have to wait...
I looked at the list in the paper, and something is very dumbfounding.
The vast majority of the mutations are not in the protein coding region of the genes, but in the auxiliary regions: introns, promoters, 5' untranslated regions (5'UTR). Very few mutations are in the coding region itself.
What this means is that people who live longer have the same set of proteins as anyone else, but the way these proteins are switched on/off is better optimized.
It will be extremely difficult to target DNA with drugs. Most drugs are developed for targeting proteins. This will require a paradigm shift for drug development.
So much for the "singularity" by Kurzweil, de Grey, and other cranks.
Reply
julian202
1 Comment
Re: Anti aging drugs will have to wait...
Kurzweil and de Grey are giving the right message, it's just a matter of time. A lot of work is already done on RNA as a target for drugs.
Reply