Biomedicine

Genes for Extreme Longevity

Scientists can predict who will live past 100 using a subset of 150 genetic variations.

  • Thursday, July 1, 2010
  • By Emily Singer

By analyzing just 150 spots on the genome, researchers can predict who will live to extreme old age with almost 80 percent accuracy, according to a study published online today in the journal Science. Researchers from Boston University employed a widely used genetic-screening technology to find genetic variations that occur more frequently in centenarians--people age 100 and older.

In addition to providing a potential way to predict who might live into their 100s, the findings suggest that genetics play a major role in surviving to extreme old age. And the team hopes that identifying the genes and corresponding molecular mechanisms that promote longevity will give new insight into how to prevent or delay age-related diseases, such as heart disease, Alzheimer's, and cancer.

"Centenarians are a model of aging well," says Thomas Perls, director of the New England Centenarian Study at Boston Medical Center and an author of the study. Previous findings from the project, the largest study of centenarians in the world, show that 90 percent of them are free of disability to an average age of 93. "They seem to compress disability to the end of their lives," says Perls. "I am very hopeful that understanding how centenarians do that will lead to new strategies for therapies."

Perhaps most surprisingly, preliminary analysis showed that centenarians had just as many genetic variants linked to diseases as did people in the control group. "That suggests that what makes people live long lives is not lack of genetic disposition to disease but longevity-promoting genes," says Paola Sebastiani, a biostatistician at Boston University and coauthor of the study. "If longevity variants cancel out disease-associated variants, it could open new ways of treating age-related diseases." The findings also call into question genetic tests now available to consumers that calculate an individual's risk for a specific disease, such as type 2 diabetes or cancer, based on common genetic variants. "The finding needs to be replicated, but if it's true, trying to predict risk of disease out of context may be inaccurate," says Sebastiani. "You need the overall genetic background to make an accurate prediction."

Advertisement

The researchers used microarrays, chips dotted with specific sequences of DNA, to screen centenarians in the study for about 30,000 common genetic variations. They identified about 30 variants found at significantly higher rates in two groups of centenarians compared to a control group. Each individual variant had little impact, however, so the researchers developed an algorithm to combine the effects of multiple variants acting together. Using a list of the variants that differed most between the control groups and centenarians, they found that the predictive value topped out at about 150 variants; in an independent set of 250 centenarians and 350 controls, the model could accurately predict the centenarians 77 percent of the time. The remaining 23 percent may possess as-yet unidentified genetic factors or be the result of environmental factors not accounted for by the model.

Most centenarians possess a subset of the 150 variants, and the researchers found that their genetic profiles cluster into 19 different genetic signatures. The longest survivors, who live a median age of 108, have the highest number of longevity variants, says Sebastiani. "And some of the signatures correlate with the latest age of onset of age-related diseases, such as dementia or cardiovascular disease."

"To have about 150 genes involved in exceptional longevity is really very few," says Nir Barzilai, director of the Institute for Aging Research at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, in New York, who was not involved in the study. "I think it's within our power to understand their mechanisms and to start to develop drugs against aging."

Print

Related Articles

The Argument over Aging

Can a drug extend good health and postpone the effects of aging?

Longevity Gene Keeps Brain Agile

People with a cholesterol gene variant are more likely to live longer and with better brain function.

The Genetic Secrets of Longevity

A study of long-lived families will help isolate the genetic mysteries that allow some people to live disease-free into their nineties and beyond.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

gabrielg01

450 Comments

  • 588 Days Ago
  • 07/01/2010

Anti aging drugs will have to wait...

I looked at the list in the paper, and something is very dumbfounding.

The vast majority of the mutations are not in the protein coding region of the genes, but in the auxiliary regions: introns, promoters, 5' untranslated regions (5'UTR). Very few mutations are in the coding region itself.

What this means is that people who live longer have the same set of proteins as anyone else, but the way these proteins are switched on/off is better optimized.

It will be extremely difficult to target DNA with drugs. Most drugs are developed for targeting proteins. This will require a paradigm shift for drug development.

So much for the "singularity" by Kurzweil, de Grey, and other cranks.

Reply

julian202

1 Comment

  • 587 Days Ago
  • 07/02/2010

Re: Anti aging drugs will have to wait...

Kurzweil and de Grey are giving the right message, it's just a matter of time. A lot of work is already done on RNA as a target for drugs.

Reply

Teclo

1 Comment

  • 585 Days Ago
  • 07/04/2010

Genetic testing

It'd be neat if genetic testing companies companies like "23andMe" or others tested for these genetic signatures.

Would you want to know, though?
What if you don't have these genes and you are in the genetic group that is expected to die younger...?

Reply

gabrielg01

450 Comments

  • 585 Days Ago
  • 07/04/2010

Re: Genetic testing

My 2 cents is that one should know, even if the news are bad.

It would help with estate planning, life insurance, stuff like that. After all, our lives are not only about ourselves, but also about the people who immediately surround us.

PS - just keep that info out of the hands of insurers...

Reply

martinaatayo

112 Comments

  • 585 Days Ago
  • 07/04/2010

Too early definitive conclusion !!

All arguments above are sound,comforming
to critical experimental paradigms
that must not be ignored,specifically,
1) were study subjects selected strictly
    from American society? If yes,what is
    the likely research implication?
2) Is this genetic signature pointing to
    longevity promoting genes distribution
    variant in humans?
3) what are impacting role plays of society
   and human activities as it affects healthy
   age controlling genes in humans.
Whereas the work conveys enormous implications,
conclusions at this time might
be considered hasty.
Martin Atayo
(Technologist)
Washington, DC

Reply

jjs

78 Comments

  • 583 Days Ago
  • 07/06/2010

Re: Too early definitive conclusion !!

From the end of the article, the answer to your questions:

The researchers caution that the study was limited to people of European descent. "We have to do these investigations all over again for different ethnicities and maybe different environments as well," says Perls. "If you're up in Greenland, it probably takes a whole different set of genetic variations to survive in that environment than in Arizona." His team is already working with a group in Japan that is studying a group of Japanese centenarians.

Reply

Ron Krumpos

9 Comments

  • 583 Days Ago
  • 07/06/2010

Involvement = longevity

When you are actively involved in life you will usually increase your longevity. An inactive participant, a person who is simply alive, will probably not live very long. For many people whose jobs were the most important aspect of life, retirement may lead to death soon after. Those who have hobbies, a vibrant family life or friendships, and/or other personal interests are more likely to live longer.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Serious Materials

Geron

A123 Systems

Square

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement