The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Pumping wounds: Researchers hope that a simple bellows pump attached to a tube that’s applied to a wound dressing can generate enough negative pressure to spur healing.
Danielle R. Zurovcik
After the Haiti earthquake, physicians tested a vacuum pump meant to speed healing.
In mid-February, about a month after a massive earthquake leveled much of Port-au-Prince, Haiti, a wound-care team from Brigham and Women's hospital in Boston traveled to the devastated capital. The team's task was to help care for scores of patients suffering from the large open wounds that accompany amputations, crushed limbs, and other injuries. Among the team was MIT graduate student Danielle Zurovcik, who arrived ready to test a device she had developed as part of her thesis research--a cheap and portable version of the negative-pressure devices currently used to speed wound healing in hospitals.
Zurovcik and her collaborators hope the device, which costs about $3, will provide a way to improve care for patients after the emergency phase of relief efforts, including life- and limb-saving surgeries, has ended. Even after many of the emergency medical teams leave the disaster zone, the dangers of chronic wounds remain high.
"My experience in Haiti and other major earthquakes is that after the acute medical response, such as amputating limbs and setting fractures, the major disease burden is wounds," says Robert Riviello, a trauma surgeon at Brigham and Women's, and Zurovcik's collaborator. Negative-pressure therapy decreases the need to change wound dressings from one to three times per day to once every few days, a major benefit when medical staff is in short supply.
Negative-pressure devices, which act like a vacuum over the bandaged wound, have become a central part of wound therapy in the United States over the last decade. They speed healing up to threefold, depending on the type of wound, and in some cases eliminate the need for plastic surgery or skin grafts. A number of commercial versions are available in the U.S. and are used to treat burns and chronic wounds such as bed sores or diabetic foot ulcers. While scientists don't exactly know why this treatment accelerates the healing process, it likely helps by removing some of the fluid and bacteria that accumulates at the injury site and by increasing blood flow to the wound. The pressure itself may also help healing by bringing together the edges of the wound and delivering mechanical pressure, which has been shown to spur cell growth, says Dennis Orgill, a surgeon at Brigham and Women's who was not involved in the project.
Existing devices are often heavy, about five to 10 pounds, and require an energy source to create the vacuum, making them difficult to apply in disaster settings. Texas-based KCI, the leading maker of negative-pressure machines, has a portable version that's battery powered, but it costs approximately $100 per day to rent. A number of companies are working on even more portable versions, say Orgill.
But Zurovcik, inspired by a burn surgeon's plea, went a step further, designing a human-powered device that applies pressure via a simple bellows pump weighing less than half a pound. By improving the seal around the wound dressing to reduce air leaks, Zurovcik cut the pump's power requirements from about 14 watts to 80 microwatts, which comes from a hand pump.
Where'd he get that toilet plunger for $3?
I had to pay $6 at Home Depot!
Something else they should try is bathing the wounds in glycerin. It instantly dehydrates and kills bacteria, and about doubles healing speed while suppressing scarring. It's very cheap, and a "public domain" compound so there's not much direct research on it (no profits to be made, I guess.)
The real impressive part will be the sealing of the wound otherwise vacuum control will be almost not existant and therapy will be lost. I can't see it working tho' The key to VAC therapy is sustained vacuuum control, how can a toilet plunger achieve this? With that said, good enough is probably OK, at $3 a day. Get what you pay for?. Good luck all the same.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
sls1j
14 Comments
This is what our health care needs
It seems to me that this is a good idea, not just for poor countries, but for our own country too. Imagine if using a $3.00 product instead of a $100/day product without sacrificing function. That's pretty big savings. Now that is innovation.
Brian
Ranch for Sale
Reply
skipm
7 Comments
Re: This is what our health care needs
3.00 to those in Haiti or where ever. It will still cost us Americans $100 a day.
Reply
R Sweeney
68 Comments
Re: This is what our health care needs
I am pretty sure the $3 cost does not include the hundreds of millions in testing and the interest on those millions through years of delay required for FDA approval in the USA. It doesn't cover the fact that countries with no regard for invention will just steal the design and copy it, narrowing the number of people in the world who actually have to PAY for developing innovations.
It also doesn't include the redistribution of costs in US hospitals from those who pay or have insurance to pay to those who don't pay or whose government Medicare/Medicaid payments actually don't cover the cost of treatment.
Think of the extra $97 as a hidden tax.
Reply
jmc1
1 Comment
Re: This is what our health care needs
This is a clever innovation - borrowing a proven concept in wound healing, delivering it at a tiny fraction of the cost, and in a manner appropriate for developing countries. Many people will benefit.
The FDA clearance to market would almost surely be a 510(k), would certainly not take years, and would be far, far less than "hundreds of millions."
Even so, I expect the innovation would not add value in the US because electricity is cheap and consistent, whereas labor - even to just sit and pump something - is not.
Reply