New bone: An x-ray image of a patient who had a leg lengthened using the new surgical method. This image was taken after six months, showing a healed bone.
Ulf Knothe

Biomedicine

Faster Healing for Severe Fractures

A simple method uses stem cells from bone tissue to repair serious injuries quickly and cheaply.

  • Wednesday, March 10, 2010
  • By Brittany Sauser

A new surgical procedure can repair severe bone injuries and defects more quickly and simply than current methods, which include bone-grafting operations and lengthening procedures that involve inserting pins through the skin to pull bones together.

The new technique makes use of a thin tissue called the periosteum, which lines the outer surface of all bones and contains stem cells that develop into bone to repair damage. To repair major bone breaks, or repair serious defects, the researchers use the periosteum as a sleeve placed around a missing section of bone to encourage bone regrowth. For cases where there is not enough periosteum, the researchers have developed an artificial membrane as a substitute.

Melissa Knothe Tate, a professor of biomedical engineering at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, and her husband, Ulf Knothe, an orthopedic surgeon at the Cleveland Clinic, have successfully tested their method on a wheelchair-bound patient who needed surgery to lengthen one of her legs. They've also successfully tested it on sheep. The researchers presented their work yesterday at the Orthopedic Research Society meeting in New Orleans.

In the new procedure, carried out on the wheelchair patient, the researchers made a small vertical incision in the periosteum near to where a large piece of bone was missing after the leg had been lengthened. They then peeled the periosteum back, so that it remained attached to the blood vessels on the outside, and cut away a piece of bone beneath, which was then used to plug the large gap in the leg bone. The periosteum was sutured closed, forming a sleeve around the section from which the bone was removed. The gap was repaired by the transplanted segment of bone while cells from the sutured periosteum infiltrated the space below it and turned into new bone. The patient saw new bone growth one month after surgery. Knothe Tate says that such a defect would normally not heal without more serious surgery.

Advertisement

One of the most common methods for treating a severe bone injury is to take bone from a non-weight-bearing area like the hip and graft it onto the injured site, but that can leave the site the bone was taken from at risk of a fracture. Jennifer Elisseeff, a biomedical engineer at Johns Hopkins University, says very little can be done to fix large gaps in bone, but adds that the new technique "will have a significant effect for healing fractures."

Norman Marcus, an orthopedic surgeon at the Virginia Cartilage Institute, in Springfield, VA, says artificial treatments fall into two categories: structural and growth-related. Structural products, typically called bone fillers, can be made of items like coral and calcium phosphate. Growth-related products, which are usually in the form of powders and gels, are used to stimulate bone growth. While the growth promoters are more effective, they are expensive, says Marcus.

Print

Related Articles

Biomaterial Could Let Doctors 'Sculpt' Delicate Facial Features

The new material, which can be injected, molded, and set in place by exposure to light, could benefit people disfigured by disease or injury.

Making Spider-Strength Materials

Genetically modified bacteria can produce enough proteins for super-strong spider silk.

Bone-setting Glue

A new adhesive, inspired by aquatic worms, could help repair shattered bone.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

cripdyke

52 Comments

  • 700 Days Ago
  • 03/10/2010

Dumb Smart People

You know, whether it's the people at MIT writing these articles or whether the phrase originated from the doctors conducting the study, smart people can sure be dumb.

While I expect the general public to use self-contradicting metaphors, people at MIT paid to write?

So when I saw that one of the volunteers was "confined to a wheelchair" I thought, what, with a court order? Were they tied down? The whole thought is preposterous. If wheelchairs were instruments of confinement they would be a lot more effective - and a lot cheaper - if they left off the wheels!

Somehow, I suspect that the patient would be more "confined" without the wheelchair than with it.
Ah! Smart people!

Reply

Mapou

356 Comments

  • 700 Days Ago
  • 03/10/2010

Re: Dumb Smart People

Man, you got some serious issues with anal retentiveness. This is an informative and well written article. Be cool.

Reply

dmm

270 Comments

  • 700 Days Ago
  • 03/10/2010

Re: Dumb Smart People

I get your point, but what phrase would you suggest instead?  It has to just as pithy as "confined to a wheelchair," a phrase which may be objectionable but which everyone understands.

Reply

cripdyke

52 Comments

  • 674 Days Ago
  • 04/05/2010

Re: Dumb Smart People

I always just say, someone is "a wheelchair user". It's actually shorter/pithier than "confined to a wheelchair," and communicates exactly what is going on. I'm sure other people could also come up with equally clear phrases. I didn't suggest any because my point was not to create a new orthodoxy, just that the old orthodoxy does not make sense - some consider it insulting, but as a writer, I think it is a ridiculous phrase because it says the opposite of the truth.

While colloquialisms among friends are one thing, I would expect someone writing for MIT to take their professional responsibilities to create understandable language seriously. For me, that means you don't say the opposite of what you mean, even if you are employing a commonly used expression. Call me anal retentive if you like, but I find the language not only ridiculous on its face, but it leads to even greater absurdities - I heard a radio show announce that on Dec. 31 last year there were 190k+ veterans confined to a wheelchair. You thought being confined to a wheelchair alone was tough - what about being on the bottom of that pile?!?

I think, perhaps the poster above you failed to see that there's some poor language-smithing going on, but there's also a great deal of humor. Too bad that person missed teh funny.

Reply

flared0ne

395 Comments

  • 699 Days Ago
  • 03/11/2010

Re: Dumb Smart People

I must admit I was expecting to hear about some new technological approach to the process (like "if we harvest some of THIS type of tissue and culture it properly, the resulting membrane can be re-implanted into a temporary structural scaffolding to regrow replacement bone") but I gather we still haven't reached the "culture it properly" stage yet.

What IS here reads somewhat like advances in horticultural grafting technology -- "when you transplant, be sure to get some of this tissue and its ancillary support tissues too." Progress, but still dependent upon individual cases, not universally applicable.

BTW: cripdyke, given your choice from the wide descriptor-space of usernames, I'd say you just might possibly have some issues with wheelchairs and confinement in general. Glad we could provide a venue and play a small part in your performance art.

Reply

cstandley

1 Comment

  • 700 Days Ago
  • 03/10/2010

reply

I too noted that it is immaterial whether the person is in a wheelchair.  That sentence was for the purpose of exciting the reader.  I suspect the person is in bed sometimes as well, but that doesn't read quite as well.

Reply

bkshilo

35 Comments

  • 700 Days Ago
  • 03/10/2010

Periodontal diesease?

Could this method be applicable to regrowing bone in the mouth/jaw lost due to periodontal disease?

Reply

Advertisement

Phineas

127 Comments

  • 700 Days Ago
  • 03/10/2010

Improvements Are Welcome

The article is clear. Some medical repairs are expensive and iffy. I guess these types of injury need more care than a rib fracture of a seventeen year old in good health. Any incremental advance that improves outcome and saves cost, is good.

Reply

flared0ne

395 Comments

  • 698 Days Ago
  • 03/12/2010

Ah, now I see...

After reading through this again, I get a different "take home" message -- for cases where it is necessary to 'harvest' segments of bone to make repairs over THERE, it is possible to PLAN that harvest so that the source location over HERE, where segments are taken FROM, will require minimal repair for an optimal result.

For example: for a repair requiring a segment of two-unit-lengths over THERE, harvest a segment of three-unit-lengths from HERE, and use the extra one-unit-length segment to repair the three-unit-length gap left over HERE.

Seems QUITE reasonable. Would be curious to find out if the resulting repaired segment over HERE is now stronger, etc, as a source for FUTURE (ongoing) repair materials, or if there might be reasons to avoid doing that.

Reply

profquatermass

57 Comments

  • 554 Days Ago
  • 08/03/2010

Nice.

Good to see a new and better technique.

But it's still gonna hurt like hell for the patient just for less time!

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Complete Genomics

Siemens

BrightSource Energy

Novomer

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement