The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Technology Review
Several recent deals could make tests more common.
Even though nearly 2,000 genetic tests are available today, most Americans have never taken one. (Save, perhaps, for newborn screening.) That may soon change, as the nation's largest businesses responsible for managing prescription benefits, Medco and CVS Caremark, delve into the DNA testing business. Taken together, the two companies cover more than 100 million Americans.
In the industry's jargon, Medco and CVS Caremark are known as pharmacy-benefit managers, acting as middlemen between insurers or employers and their customers or employees to negotiate cheaper drug prices, and to develop tools to improve the prescription process. These companies largely took over the prescription drug industry 15 years ago, and they may now do the same for genetic testing.
Earlier this month, Medco announced that it had acquired DNA Direct, a genetic testing startup based in San Francisco. The announcement follows a similar deal by CVS Caremark in December, when it increased its ownership share in Generation Health, a New Jersey-based startup created to analyze the effectiveness of genetic tests. "There is consumer demand right now," says Robert Epstein, Medco's chief medical officer. "People want to know--I've just been diagnosed with cancer, what tests do I need?"
While the majority of existing genetic tests screen for rare, single-gene disorders, a number are available for more common conditions--substantially increased risk for certain cancers, blood clots, or cardiac abnormalities, as well as genetically determined differences in an individual's response to specific drugs. But use of the tests has not caught on, for a variety of reasons. Physicians don't understand them, patients aren't aware of them, and it's not yet clear how effective they are at both improving a patient's long-term outcome and decreasing health costs.
Medco is targeting all of those gaps. The company has already made some strides in pharmacogenomics--using genetic testing to personalize prescription drugs. Medco's pharmacists call physicians and patients to offer the appropriate genetic test for a prescribed drug and then help interpret the results. "Physicians understand the concept of pharmacogenomics, but they don't really feel comfortable interpreting the results," says Pat Deverka, a physician and researcher at the Institute for Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy at the University of North Carolina, in Chapel Hill. A recent survey by Medco found that while almost all physicians polled recognized that genetic profiles may influence a reaction to a drug, only 10 percent believed they were adequately informed about pharmacogenetic testing.
Actually, the benefits outweigh the risks in terms of therapeutic outcomes.
This technology is getting cheaper every day. Being able to determine (before medicating a person) if they carry a polymorphism that makes them poor metabolizers, rapid metabolizers, or high risk for a serious adverse drug reaction makes the technology very useful.
It's already being used to choose optimal cancer therapies - sparing patients the trauma of going through a specific chemo regimen that achieves no results.
As far as the insurance industry abusing this, I totally agree. Genetic testing information should not be used for actuary calculations. The health benefits and savings in facilitating optimal therapy should be enough to warrant patient protection from insurance abuse. Otherwise, what patient in their right mind would risk a premium hike to find out?
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
mgallece
1 Comment
How slippery a slope?
As a research/patient advocate, the creation of any provider owned genetic testing interest needs very close scrutiny and strong ethical review and regulation.
The prohibitive costs of many genetic tests and their informative or useful application for the general public has created an expensive, high risk realm for the patient population that still favors the insurance and medical marketing industry far more than those being tested in most cases.
This is currently a highly lucrative and poorly regulated market. The close relationship to the insurance industry in this case should be raising every red flag.
What an excellent example of profit driven interests and why we need meaningful health care reform and stronger industry controls. The reasons why the public hasn't quickly climbed onto this runaway train isn't so difficult to discern. The harms still outweigh the benefits and, in this case, the lines are dangerously blurred considering the insurance implications.
Reply
innonut
1 Comment
Re: How slippery a slope?
Hi, Unfortunately the DNA testing is not as lucrative as you suggest. However, great investment is required and without financial gain promise most research resulting in patient benefits will not materialize.
Reply