Chemical operation: This machine uses mass spectrometry to make molecular maps of tissue during surgery. Fumes generated by an electroscalpel are sucked into the machine through the tubing at lower left.
Zoltán Takáts

Biomedicine

Surgical Scalpel Sniffs Out Cancer

A cutting tool distinguishes tissue types based on their chemical profiles.

  • Friday, October 9, 2009
  • By Katherine Bourzac

In the hope of helping oncologists remove every piece of tumor tissue during surgery, researchers are developing new imaging tools that work in real time in the operating room. European researchers have now demonstrated that a chemical analysis instrument called a mass spectrometer can be coupled with an electroscalpel to create a molecular profile of tissue during surgery. The researchers have shown that the method can be used to map out different tissue types and distinguish cancerous tissue. The device will begin clinical trials next month.

"When a surgeon is performing cancer surgery, he doesn't have any direct information on where the tumor is," says Zoltán Takáts, a professor at Justus-Liebig University in Giessen, Germany. Instead, surgeons rely on preoperative imaging scans and on feedback from pathologists examining tissue biopsies under a microscope. "We want to provide a tool that's right in their hands, so that if they think a structure looks suspicious, they can just test it," says Takáts.

Mass spectrometry, a very precise method for identifying molecules by analyzing the ratio between their mass and charge, is already being used by a handful of research groups to study biological samples. Researchers have known for many years that tumor tissue and healthy tissue have different molecular profiles and that this can be used to tell them apart, or even to determine how aggressive a particular tumor is. Other research groups have used mass spectrometry to analyze biopsied tissue and have shown that it can make these differentiations. The problem with using mass spectrometry in the operating room is sample collection. Before molecules can be analyzed, they have to be ionized and sucked up into the machine. Creating ions requires bombarding a sample with a stream of charged particles, often a gas, and these methods aren't suitable for the operating room. "A high-voltage nitrogen jet is not compatible with the human body," says Takáts.

Advertisement

Takáts realized that some surgical cutting tools, including electroscalpels, produce gaseous ions as a kind of waste product that are suitable for analysis with mass spectrometry. And these fumes, often called "surgical smoke," are already collected during surgery because they're harmful to the lungs. Takáts and his collaborators found that mass spectrometry of surgical smoke can be used to make a molecular map of a tumor. After the fumes are sucked into the mass spectrometer, the chemicals in the sample are identified and checked against a database to give the surgeon a readout. Gathering and analyzing a chemical sample takes a few hundred milliseconds. "We can draw a map and say this part is healthy liver, that is connective tissue, this is adipose tissue, that is cancer," says Takáts.

Print

Related Articles

Lighting Up Tumors

Surgical imaging system turns cancer tissue neon.

Finding Evidence in Fingerprints

A technique reveals drugs and explosives on the scene.

A New Tool for Surgeons

Mass spectrometry, a favorite analytical technique of chemists, may find a place in the operating room.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

hankejh

20 Comments

  • 858 Days Ago
  • 10/09/2009

Giant Leap

It seems that the implications for patients are massive -- this strikes me as a leap forward from robotic-assisted minimally-invasive surgical procedures debuted during my tenure as CTO of the Virtual Operating Room.  The need for follow-on corrective surgery procedures will likely drop; I'm looking forward to metrics!

Reply

erbium

340 Comments

  • 856 Days Ago
  • 10/11/2009

Direct detection of tissue type

could be useful in another very big way:

It hit me during recent medical training including giving injections and phlebotomy that this could be automated.  Having the skills is great but ewwtube [sic] is filled with videos of failed blood draw on infants, and many others can be very hard to start IVs or draw blood, including those who are elderly or sick.

An automated injection system could be placed in the approximate starting place, (still using judgement of where to start), and it would detect tissue types very quickly similar to the system in the article, stopping when in a vein (or artery at times).

This could take the pain out of draw from people who are notoriously hard to draw.  We get notations like 'very hard draw' from our phlebotomy dept.  it might also allow more people who are not great at phlebotomy go into or stay in nursing. 

Someone would have to figure out ways to correctly detect tissue differences quickly in realtime as the needle was inserted.  I'm sure this could be done experimentally.

besides blood draws, the same or a similar system could be used to give medicines SQ, IM, etc.  Having to get numerous shots and feeling them for weeks afterword, despite being healthy and in shape, a system like this could be optimized to ensure is in the right type of tissue, esp. for those who are small (infants), thin (elderly, frail or sick) where it is hard to tell where needle is.  Some people get ALOT of injections such as rheumatoid arthritis sufferers, would be esp. useful to minimize pain and tissue damage, getting meds in right place.  Injection rates are arbitrary now, based on the person giving the injection's judgment.  This could be either standardized to minimize damage or adjustable with slower rate for frail people or dift types of meds.

I envision that a system for high volume use in specialty offices and hospitals would be developed first and later hand held systems as the system came down in price and widespread use.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Pacific Biosciences

Square

Lyric Semiconductor

Layar

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement