Glow bug: Scientists are engineering Rhodococcus bacteria to boost production of lipids (glowing white balls), which can be converted into biodiesel.
Daniel MacEachran

Biomedicine

A Better Bug for Biofuels

Scientists are optimizing a lipid-producing microbe to make biofuels.

  • Friday, September 25, 2009
  • By Emily Singer

While most attempts to engineer biofuel-producing microbes have focused on well-known organisms such as yeasts and E. coli, scientists also hope to co-opt the unique metabolic functions of some of the microbial world's less-studied creatures. Anthony Sinskey and his team at MIT have been cataloguing the genomic secrets of Rhodococcus bacteria, soil-dwelling microbes known to eat a variety of toxic compounds. The goal is to make a biodiesel-producing organism that can use a variety of sources as fuel. "We have done a lot of the basic chemistry and biology," says Sinskey. "Now we need to figure out how to maximize yields."

The strain of bacteria that Sinskey is working on, Rhodococcus opacus, is related to the type that causes tuberculosis, but it has two particularly appealing qualities. The bacteria have a flexible appetite, with the ability to eat a number of sugars and toxic compounds--in fact, the microbes were originally isolated from contaminated soil, where they were breaking down petroleum waste products. In addition, R. opacus are one of just a few types of bacteria that naturally produce a type of lipid called tryacylglycerols, which can be chemically converted into biodiesel. "Its life is focused around lipid metabolism, eating weird lipids and making more of them," says Jason Holder, a postdoctoral researcher in Sinskey's lab. "The trick is to engineer them to make it more efficiently, using waste streams of carbon."

The research is part of a larger effort to develop biofuels that, unlike ethanol made from corn or sugarcane, do not rely on food sources or agricultural land. Some companies, such as Synthetic Genomics, Amyris, LS9, and Joule Biotechnologies, are using synthetic biology techniques to engineer bacteria to more efficiently produce desirable metabolic products that can be used for biofuels.

Advertisement

Sinskey's team has recently sequenced R. opacus's genome and mapped its 9,000 genes into various metabolic pathways. Understanding these pathways allows scientists to boost or inhibit specific reactions, which can in turn increase the microbe's efficiency at creating a particular fuel or end product. The researchers have also developed a microarray for Rhodococcus--a genomics tool that allows scientists to quickly assess patterns of gene expression--and are using it to study these metabolicnetworks. "It will allow us to predict other bacteria that might do the same thing," says Sinskey, "and it will help us identify genes important in the assembly process." They plan to publish the genome soon.

Print

Related Articles

Biofuel Plant Opens in Brazil

Amyris's large-scale demonstration plant will make diesel from sugarcane.

The Price of Biofuels

Making ethanol from corn is expensive. Better biofuels are years away from the gas tank. Farmers are reluctant to change their practices. But do we really have any alternative to biofuels?

Building Better Biofuels

Startup LS9 is developing microbes that produce hydrocarbons.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

boustrephon

50 Comments

  • 872 Days Ago
  • 09/25/2009

Specificity is Good

I am not sure that engineering a more general bug is good. What happens if we manage to engineer a super-bug that likes to eat everything....! We could end up with biodiesel and nothing else...

Reply

erbium

340 Comments

  • 871 Days Ago
  • 09/26/2009

What if it escapes?

The problem with the idea of this bug escaping and converting the world into biodiesel is also the problem with the nanobot 'grey goo' theory.

It might work if the world was a giant homogenous cupcake, but the real world is filled with incredible diversity we barely understand.  VERY quickly something would start eating this 'bug'. 

And as the other poster mentioned, vat 'bugs' don't survive well outside the vat.  Why hasn't everything in the world turned into flowing 'sam adams' beer?  they brew huge vats filled with their 'superbug' yeast that makes super beer.

Reply

Gurthang

52 Comments

  • 872 Days Ago
  • 09/25/2009

Not worring

The tweaks they are making to these "bugs" that make them more efficient producers will likely render them poor survivors outside their "vats". In fact I would bet because most bacteria are randy plasmid swaping gene whores contamination with more "natural" strains would pose a serious threat to these "super bugs" if only because they put more energy into reproduction.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Suntech

Complete Genomics

Siemens

Netflix

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement