Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Predicting Drug Response from Brain Waves

A device helps to pair patients with the right antidepressant.

By Rachel Kremen

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Brain waves measured using a simple device just one week into treatment can indicate whether a depressed patient should continue taking a medication or be switched to another. The study, which was conducted at nine sites across the U.S., could significantly reduce the time it takes to effectively treat major depression.

Mind reading: The system above was used to predict whether patients should be kept on one antidepressant or switched to another. The strap around the subject’s head contains electrodes that pick up brain waves. The strap hooks up to a hockey-puck-size device that digitizes and filters the EEG signal before sending it on to a laptop for processing.
Credit: Aspect Medical Systems

"Selecting the right antidepressant medication is a bit of a shot in the dark," says Andrew Leuchter, professor of psychiatry at UCLA and lead author of the study. "The first medicine we choose only gets the patient well about a third of the time."

Antidepressants must be taken for approximately eight weeks before it's clear whether or not the medicine will have an effect. Patients frequently have to try two to three medications before finding an effective one, meaning the search for the right medication can take many months. "This leads to prolonged disability, prolonged suffering, and the chance that the patient may never get well," says Leuchter. "Some patients say, 'I don't need this,' and drop out of treatment." The testing process studied by Leuchter and his colleagues, which takes only 15 minutes, could help those suffering from depression find relief faster.

For the study, the researchers used a customized version of a quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) system to study the brainwave patterns of 375 people suffering from major depression. The device, developed by Aspect Medical Systems of Norwood, MA, consists of a few electrodes mounted on a strap that is worn across the patient's head. (Aspect Medical provided funding for the study and employs Leuchter as a consultant. Leuchter is also a minor shareholder in the firm.) The strap hooks up to a hockey-puck-size device that digitizes and filters the EEG signal, as well as performing some basic processing. That device plugs into a laptop computer, which does the bulk of the signal analysis.

Story continues below

Unlike a standard QEEG system, which requires bulky equipment and is often housed in its own lab, the Aspect Medical system is small and portable. Leuchter says the system doesn't require a lot of specialized training like traditional QEEG systems, either; it took only a few hours to train staff to use the device. "The process is so simple, even a doctor can do it," he says. While the device is still far from commercialization, the ultimate intent is to offer it to physicians.

Scientists measured brain activity before the patient was on any medication and then again one week after starting the popular antidepressant escitalopram, which targets a chemical messenger called serotonin. The patients were then randomly assigned to one of three groups: one group continued on escitalopram alone; one group was switched to another common antidepressant, bupropion, which acts on the chemical messengers norepinephrine and dopamine; and the third group took both medications.

Comments

  • statistics
    According to the article, only a third of patients are successful with their first antidepressant. So, if I were to predict that a patient would not respond to escitalopram, I would presumably be right 67% of the time. This doesn't seem all that far from the 74% touted by this new method. Perhaps breaking down the statistics into false positives and false negatives would be more enlightening.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ms
    09/22/2009
    Posts:129
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Idiotic research
    This is yet another fine example of money wasted to support the failed drug industry model of perpetual medication as a "treatment" for chronic illness.

    What we need is more research on natural ways to treat and cure illness using natural unpatentable substances like vitamins and other nutrients. A lot of this research has been done, but unfortunately it is largely ignored by medical schools and hospitals, whoa re always sucking up to the big drug companies.

    The following nutrients have been shown to cure depression:

    methyl donors
    omega 3 fatty acids
    chromium
    selenium
    methylfolate
    B12
    vitamin B6
    vitamin D
    SAM-e

    and probably many more are waiting to be discovered. but instead of this actual useful research, we get garbage like this-designed to keep people sick and dependent on toxic drugs.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dodanimal
    09/27/2009
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.