Sound system: The LENABaby system uses a digital recording device to capture up to 16 hours of audio, which is then analyzed to diagnose autism and language delays.
LENA Foundation

Biomedicine

A Device to Spot Autism Early

A new system automatically analyzes vocalizations for signs of autism.

  • Tuesday, September 15, 2009
  • By Rachel Kremen

Researchers have developed a device that can automatically identify autistic children as young as 24 months using the vocalizations they make during a normal day at home. Instead of waiting months or years for an appointment with a specialist, parents could get an objective diagnosis by mail in a couple of weeks.

According to a recent study from researchers at Washington University in St. Louis, the average age of diagnosis for autism is 5.7 years old -- several years after such a diagnosis is first possible. With the new system, developed at the LENA Foundation, diagnosis takes just a few weeks. "Intervention is most effective when the child is two to four years old," says Jill Gilkerson, director of child language research at the LENA Foundation.

The foundation says its tool can distinguish, with 91 percent accuracy, between a child developing normally, a child with autism, and a child with unassociated language delays.

The home kit, called LENABaby, hit the market earlier this month and consists of a questionnaire regarding the child's development, a digital audio recorder, and an outfit for the child to wear. First thing in the morning, the parent puts the outfit on the child and slides the recorder into a pocket on the front. The recorder is left on all day so that it can capture up to 16 hours of audio. At the end of the day, the parent removes the device from the pocket and sends it to the foundation, where the LENABaby software can analyze the data.

Advertisement

"Roughly speaking, autistic children vocalize differently from other children," explainsDongxin Xu,manager of software and language engineering at the LENA Foundation. While this concept isn't new, clinicians have had a hard time using it to their best advantage when making a diagnosis. The problem is, in part, logistical: with existing methods, it is hard to collect enough good-quality data.

Gilkersonsays that most traditional assessments take less than four hours. LENABaby, in contrast, considers a full day of activities in the child's natural environment. Traditional assessments can be done in the child's home, but this often involves multiple video cameras and lights, which can influence the child's behavior.

Even if enough data is gathered, analyzing the audio is still extremely difficult and time-consuming. Making a diagnosis isn't as simple as counting the number of times the child makes a certain kind of sound, explains Jeffrey Richards, a statistician and database technician for the LENA Foundation.

Print

Related Articles

Testing Autism Drugs in Human Brain Cells

A method involving pluripotent stem cells could lead to personalized treatment of the disease.

Drug Trials for Autism

Treatments are being tested for three inherited forms.

Brain Signal Linked to Autism

Imaging the brain during social interaction reveals a deficit that may be tied to a sense of self.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

hsfrey

13 Comments

  • 882 Days Ago
  • 09/15/2009

What is the Evidence?

This reads like a Press Release!

Shouldn't the article have given SOME hint about What is the Evidence that vocalizations differ between autistic and normal children?

And, what are the number of false positives and false negatives from using this technique, using clinical data as the standard of comparison?

Reply

miamoe

1 Comment

  • 882 Days Ago
  • 09/15/2009

Re: specificity and sensitivity

Research on the automatic autism screen is ongoing.  Preliminary results
with 159 children (75 diagnosed with ASD) 24-48 months of age indicate
the following (assuming equal error rate): sensitivity (.91);
specificity (.91); positive predictive value (.90); negative predictive
value (.92).  A detailed technical report will be posted on
lenafoundation.org in October.  More detailed technical information can
also be obtained from LENA Foundation on request at:
info@lenafoundation.org

Reply

fear-teagaisg

1 Comment

  • 880 Days Ago
  • 09/17/2009

Where's the data?

There is no real data. This has all the hallmarks scam like the places that diagnose autism by analyzing the kids' hair. They claim similar numbers.  That this is being sold as a diagnostic tool before it has been tested marks these people as irresponsible and unethical.  Of course, since it's autism, anything goes.

Reply

cowsandmilk

5 Comments

  • 879 Days Ago
  • 09/18/2009

"University of Washington in St. Louis"???

how about getting the name of the school right?

Washington University... in St. Louis

no of, nothing to do with the University of Washington, halfway across the country from that state and in existence decades before the state.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Joule Unlimited

American Superconductor

Akamai

Goldwind Science and Technology

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement