Snap diagnosis: The Cellscope uses a blue-light LED and filters for fluorescence imaging. The sample is inserted next to the metal focusing knob.
David Breslauer

Biomedicine

A Cell-Phone Microscope for Disease Detection

A cheap smart-phone microscope could bring fluorescent medical imaging to areas with limited access to health care.

  • Thursday, July 23, 2009
  • By Anne-Marie Corley

In a twist on traditional smart-phone accessories, researchers have demonstrated fluorescent microscopy using a physical attachment to an ordinary cell phone. The researchers behind the device say that it could identify and track diseases like tuberculosis (TB) and malaria in developing countries with limited access to health care, or in rural areas of the U.S.

The "Cellscope," which came out of an optics-class project at the University of California, Berkeley, could capture and perform simple analysis of magnified images of blood and sputum samples, or transmit the images over the cell-phone network for analysis elsewhere.

The contraption--a tube-like extension hooked onto the cell phone with a modified belt clip--works just like a traditional microscope, using a series of lenses that magnify blood or spit samples on a microscope slide. To detect TB, for example, a spit sample is infused with an inexpensive dye called auramine. An "excitation" wavelength is emitted by the light source--a blue light-emitting diode (LED) on the opposite end of the device from the cell phone--and absorbed by the auramine dye in the spit sample, which fluoresces green to illuminate TB bacteria. Then automated software can count the green bacteria for a diagnosis in real time, or the image can be transmitted via cell network to a separate facility where doctors can analyze it and respond.

"The cell phone approach is very valuable for all parts of the world where [medical] resources are scarce," says Aydogan Ozcan, an assistant professor of electrical engineering at UCLA, who is working to develop a lens-free method for mobile cell imaging. "It's a great step forward in this important area."

Advertisement

The researchers involved with the project, led by Berkeley bioengineering professor Daniel Fletcher, describe their work in a paper published in the journal PLoS One. They previously demonstrated a prototype device that used white light, or bright-field imaging, to capture magnified images of blood cells stained to detect malaria parasites, an approach that could also identify the oddly shaped red blood cells indicating sickle cell disease. Fluorescence adds a new capability that could be particularly useful if made cheaper and portable.

"Fluorescence microscopy in resource-poor countries is hard," says Wilbur Lam, a bioengineer and physician in the UCSF School of Medicine who worked on the project as a clinical expert. "Lab-grade [fluorescence] technology is expensive and hard to operate," he says. "You need a dark room, a mercury lamp, and a lot of training." These facilities aren't available in many areas of developing nations, which, Lam notes, are the places that most need the technology to detect common diseases like TB. The Cellscope device could be distributed to health workers in remote areas, extending the reach of fluorescence-based medical imaging.

Print

Related Articles

Fingertip Microscope Can Peek Inside a Moving Animal

Made from cheap, mass-producible parts, the device could help scientists learn how the brain directs movement.

$3 Microscope Plugs into Cell Phones

Inexpensive, lightweight device provides basic medical diagnostics and images.

Rapid TB Detector

An ultrasensitive test can spot bacteria in a half hour.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

fkearney

6 Comments

  • 933 Days Ago
  • 07/23/2009

Why is the Lab More Expensive?

The description of cell phone method's low cost begs a question: If it's so easy and inexpensive compared to the traditional lab method, why shouldn't it replace the lab method?  At least, the cell counting software should be used on lab microscopes to take the work out of manual counting.  Score an easy one for lower cost medical care?

Reply

mike.horak@ngc.com

4 Comments

  • 933 Days Ago
  • 07/23/2009

Cheaper...yes...but

When talking medical tests in "lower Slabovia" where transportation of equipment to the site or samples to a lab, yeah this gadget that can be packed in a "ditty bag" is less expensive.  I'm guessing there may be an element of accuracy or ease of use issue involved too.  Where, stationary equipment in a lab that involves multiple tests per day I'm sure that the accuracy and ease of use make tests less expensive than this gadget in a "ditty bag". 

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Layar

Pacific Biosciences

Life Technologies

eSolar

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement