Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

New Clues to How Primates Evolved

Continued from page 1

By Emily Singer

Thursday, February 12, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

It's also unclear if the acceleration seen in the chimp and human ancestor is unique. "These basic kinds of mutations have been going on for at least 90 million years," says Nick Patterson, a geneticist at the Broad Institute, in Cambridge, MA. "The question is whether there is something unusual in what happened in human lineage; I doubt we have enough data to answer that." This type of comparison would require genome sequences for many related mammal species.

Duplications are likely to have very different evolutionary properties than single-letter changes. Both arise from mistakes at the molecular level, which can then either help, harm, or do nothing to the reproductive fitness of the organism. Most single-letter changes fall into the neutral category. But because duplicative changes often increase the number of copies of a gene and thus potentially increase the concentration of protein that gene produces, they are more likely to exert an effect on the carrier.

In addition, while single-letter changes may make a particular protein more or less effective by slightly tweaking its structure, duplications that create additional copies of specific genes free up the new copies to evolve an entirely new purpose. "You havetwo copies that can diverge from each other," says Perry. "One copy can then experience mutation and attain a new function that could be important for the biology of that organism." For example, color vision in primates arose thanks to the duplication of the gene for visual pigment. "With this kind of analysis," says Perry, "we can begin to identify other genes specific to different lineages, and then study the potential effect they might have on the biology of these species."

Most of the duplications analyzed in the study--more than 80 percent--are shared by humans, chimps, and gorillas. But the genes in duplicated regions unique to humans are largely ones that have not yet been characterized. "We found more than 30 genes that are duplicated only in humans," says Marques-Bonet. "But we still don't know what they do."

Comments

  • ode to homo eructus
    From the great apes we slowly ascended,
    Taking our place on the evolutionary tree,
    The human race was clearly intended,
    To be much more intelligent you see,
    But we wage wars and die from diseases,
    Pollute our planet and cause so much pain,
    I guess we were just never intended,
    To be perfect that much is quite plain.

    phoenix
    02/12/2009
    Posts:172
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • just gimmie a con(in)clusive explanation
      ok.  lemme make some sense of this..  a couple billion years ago after the earth happened to be formed and fit just the right equalities for a life to flourish, some gooey mess held the key of dna and sprouted forth with the capability for life as we know it today.
      -i'm a lil shaky on the foundations but hold with me a minute..]
      so billions of years pass and we've got the diversity of life on this planet from animal to fauna and the existence of apes in trees. yay!
      fast forward some 12 or so million years ahead and you say that humans as decadent as we are today are simply the natural evolution of animals over time, or that specific animal, over time. 
      question one, why don't we see similar examples of evolution across the spectrum of species held by this planets ecosystems?  maybe we lack the sophistications to recognize such progress?
      question two, and this is a bit involved;  characteristics move generationally, so how many total changes make the difference between homo erectus and homogorillimus and could those evolutions total the differences held between us during the time span given?  don't forget about ice ages and catastrophies.
       i watched WGBH or PBS last night talking about creationism vs evolution and both forget about the holy ghost middle ground no-mans' land ascertion that pieces of them all total the sum answer. 
    ('d never say trust me, but i know what's wrong)
       oh, and what about Mendel and his beans?  only purposeful cross breading or manipulation can create the kind of drastic differences that chance stumbles upon. 
       i'm glad i don't get paid for this- it wouldn't be as fun.

    bigrobhollin...
    02/12/2009
    Posts:11
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • Huh?
    When did this matter become truth? There are no less holes today than when Chuck made his Origin of Species assertion. I suspect he would change his mind if he knew today what he lacked back then. I am sorry that you feel comfortable believing you came from an ape, but I much prefer to believe that I came from an intelligent Creator! BTW. Try telling Dr. Tomas Marques-Bonet that his work is a "nice piece of evolution" and let me know if he's insulted.

    USC-91
    02/12/2009
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    2/5

This discussion has been moved to our discussions forum.

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Brain Imaging and IQ
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.