Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

New Clues to How Primates Evolved

Regions of DNA prone to duplication may have played a vital role in human evolution.

By Emily Singer

Thursday, February 12, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

About eight to twelve million years ago, the evolutionary ancestor to humans, chimpanzees, and orangutans appears to have undergone a burst of evolution, driven by duplicated sequences of DNA. This mechanism of genetic change, which has only recently come under scientific scrutiny, may have endowed primates with an evolutionary flexibility that drove the development of different great ape species, including humans.

Darwin’s delight: By comparing the genomes of humans, chimps, macaque monkeys, and orangutans (pictured clockwise), scientists discovered that the ancestor to the great ape lineage, which includes humans, underwent a burst of evolution about 12 million years ago. Charles Darwin (pictured lower right), born 200 years ago today, would have been proud.
Credit: Macaque, Scott Liddell; Orangutan, Tom Low; Chimpanzee, Aaron Logan; Charles Darwin, Julia Margaret Cameron

When a stretch of DNA is mistakenly duplicated, extra copies of the gene or genes within that region are added to the genome; those genes can then mutate separately. "Duplications are really important from an evolutionary perspective because they add a lot of variation to the genome," says Tomas Marques-Bonet, a scientist in Evan Eichler's lab at the University of Washington, in Seattle, who led the research. "These regions are rapidly evolving."

Most estimates of genetic similarity between humans and other primates have focused on single-letter changes to the genome as the primary basis for evolutionary change. But scientists are now discovering the importance of structural changes to the genome, which include deletions or duplications of segments of DNA between 1,000 and 100,000 letters in length. These regions are flanked by repetitive stretches that are thought to trigger errors in the cells' DNA replication process, resulting in duplicated genes.

"It's only recently that we have had the sequence data and the genomic tools to study this and understand its role in evolutionary history," says George Perry, a scientist at the University of Chicago, who was not involved in the research. The chimp genome was released in 2005, and the orangutan and macaque genome projects are ongoing. In addition, scientists can now create custom-designed gene microarrays to quickly detect a large number of specific duplications.

Story continues below


Marques-Bonet and his colleagues analyzed the genome sequence of four primate species: humans, chimpanzees, orangutans, and macaques. Humans, chimps, and orangutans descend from the African great ape lineage, sharing a common ancestor about 12 million years ago, while macaques, classified as old-world monkeys, split from the common primate lineage more than 25 million years ago. Comparing areas of DNA duplication in the genome sequence, researchers found a burst in the rate of duplications right before orangutans split from the tree, and a second burst before chimps and humans diverged, according to research published today in the journal Nature. This increase happened even as rates of single-letter changes decreased.

Scientists are hesitant to speculate about precisely how the acceleration in the rate of duplication arose in the human and chimp lineage, and how it affected human evolution. For example, it's not yet clear whether the duplications that occurred during this time period conferred an evolutionary advantage on their bearers. "We think that duplications make the genome more dynamic," says Marques-Bonet. "But having a dynamic genome creates both sides of the coin: these rearrangements can be beneficial, or they can be linked to disease." Recent research shows that duplications in the human genome play a role in a variety of diseases, including autism, schizophrenia, and mental retardation.

Comments

  • ode to homo eructus
    From the great apes we slowly ascended,
    Taking our place on the evolutionary tree,
    The human race was clearly intended,
    To be much more intelligent you see,
    But we wage wars and die from diseases,
    Pollute our planet and cause so much pain,
    I guess we were just never intended,
    To be perfect that much is quite plain.

    phoenix
    02/12/2009
    Posts:172
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • just gimmie a con(in)clusive explanation
      ok.  lemme make some sense of this..  a couple billion years ago after the earth happened to be formed and fit just the right equalities for a life to flourish, some gooey mess held the key of dna and sprouted forth with the capability for life as we know it today.
      -i'm a lil shaky on the foundations but hold with me a minute..]
      so billions of years pass and we've got the diversity of life on this planet from animal to fauna and the existence of apes in trees. yay!
      fast forward some 12 or so million years ahead and you say that humans as decadent as we are today are simply the natural evolution of animals over time, or that specific animal, over time. 
      question one, why don't we see similar examples of evolution across the spectrum of species held by this planets ecosystems?  maybe we lack the sophistications to recognize such progress?
      question two, and this is a bit involved;  characteristics move generationally, so how many total changes make the difference between homo erectus and homogorillimus and could those evolutions total the differences held between us during the time span given?  don't forget about ice ages and catastrophies.
       i watched WGBH or PBS last night talking about creationism vs evolution and both forget about the holy ghost middle ground no-mans' land ascertion that pieces of them all total the sum answer. 
    ('d never say trust me, but i know what's wrong)
       oh, and what about Mendel and his beans?  only purposeful cross breading or manipulation can create the kind of drastic differences that chance stumbles upon. 
       i'm glad i don't get paid for this- it wouldn't be as fun.

    bigrobhollin...
    02/12/2009
    Posts:11
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • Huh?
    When did this matter become truth? There are no less holes today than when Chuck made his Origin of Species assertion. I suspect he would change his mind if he knew today what he lacked back then. I am sorry that you feel comfortable believing you came from an ape, but I much prefer to believe that I came from an intelligent Creator! BTW. Try telling Dr. Tomas Marques-Bonet that his work is a "nice piece of evolution" and let me know if he's insulted.

    USC-91
    02/12/2009
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    2/5

This discussion has been moved to our discussions forum.

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.