Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Drug Trials for Autism

Treatments are being tested for three inherited forms.

By Emily Singer

Wednesday, December 03, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Three drugs will be tested in humans to treat rare, inherited conditions that are often linked to autism: Rett syndrome, fragile X, and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Scientists hope that the new drugs, if successful in the current trials, will eventually help treat more common forms of autism, which affects about 1 in 166 children in the United States. Existing drugs are used to treat symptoms of autism, such as digestive problems and psychosis, rather than the root of the disease.

Improving autism: Scientists will soon test IGF (insulin-like growth factor), shown here, to find out if it can reverse symptoms of Rett syndrome, a rare inherited disorder linked to autism.
Credit: Nevit Dilmen

"We may have our finger on a biochemical pathway that is applicable more generally in autism," said Mark Bear, a neuroscientist at MIT, at the Autism Consortium annual symposium in Boston last month.

One of the most puzzling problems with autism is that the brains of affected children look normal, making it difficult to know where to target new treatments. The discovery in the 1990s of the mutations underlying the three disorders has allowed scientists to create animal models with the same genetic mistakes. These animal models have enabled the search for more subtle molecular processes gone awry in each disease, such as abnormal gene or protein expression that changes the electrical properties of neurons, or the architecture of the synapse--that is, the connections between neurons.

In the past year, several groups have published novel treatments that appear to reverse the damage done in these diseases. "We had thought that in disorders like autism and fragile X, damage was done early, and the best we could do was stop it," said Story Landis, director of the National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke, at the Society for Neuroscience conference, in Washington, DC, last month. But these studies show that you can intervene early and perhaps restore cognitive function, she said. Findings from these studies are now being tested in humans.

People with fragile X, the most common form of heritable mental retardation and a leading cause of autism, have a mutation in the FMRP gene, which normally inhibits protein synthesis stimulated by a receptor called metabotropic glutamate receptor 5, or mGluR5.

Story continues below

Last year, Bear and Gul Dolen, also at MIT, announced that they could correct abnormal brain development and faulty memory and reduce seizures in affected mice by decreasing mGluR5 activity by 50 percent. "The idea that you could reintroduce function is a sea-change event," said Emanuel DiCicco-Bloom, a neuroscientist and physician at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, at the neuroscience conference.

Experimental drugs that target the receptor are already under development, although none have yet been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Human trials of one such drug is now under way, sponsored by Seaside Therapeutics, a company founded by Bear.

Comments

  • worthless research
    Its scandalous that there is so little research money available to investigate the likely causes of autism: heavy metal toxicity, vaccines, vitamin D deficiency and other environmental factors. Chelation and other detox/nutritional therapies have been successful in reversing autism, but only if caught early. Mercury is probably the most likely single cause of autism, and the mercury can come from many sources: vaccines, fish, mercury tooth fillings, maternal exposure.

    But gee, there only seems to be money available to investigate patentable and highly profitable treatments, like this IGF nonsense.

    The government (CDC FDA) still has not explained how there can be a rapidly growing epidemic of a supposedly genetic disease.

    These ridiculous drug-based treatments wont do much, if anything. Doctors are making progress with natural treatments for autism, but they are ignored and ridiculed by the CDC and FDA.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ddanimal
    12/08/2008
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: worthless research
      Chelation therapy can be an extremely dangerous and so far unsuccessful technique for treating autism.

      http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/chelation.html

      This is wonderful research into treatments to correct the basic neuronal causes of the spectrum of disorders.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      alnonymous49
      12/08/2008
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: worthless research
        Chelation therapy is effective medicine, ignored and suppressed by the corrupt medical establishment (NIH, FDA, big pharma). This is a little off-topic, but still relevant for what it reveals about priorities in medical research:
        http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3578908975100229253

        The truth is that chelation therapy for any purpose has never been adequately researched. The government/big pharma wont fund any big trials, and have lied and presented fraudulent results in some trials they have bothered to do. They do this because the evidence that does exist is amazing, and if chelation therapy were recognized for what it is, over $200 billion in medical expenditures and revenue for big pharma would simply disappear in favor of a more effective and safer alternative. EDTA chelation is not hazardous, though DMSA and DMPS chelation can be hazardous. And DMPS is what is needed for removing mercury.

        DMPS has been demonstrated in some cases to cure autism, if its caught early enough. And there are lots of other links between autism and mercury exposure. Vaccines are not the only source of mercury, and they are still giving vaccines with mercury in them, because the old stockpiles are so large.

        Most medical research, like this waste of money, is motivated first and foremost by a search for patentable drugs. Natural therapies and EDTA are not patentable, so they are ignored or even actively suppressed if they threaten a market for a patented drug, or lucrative surgical procedures. Its amazing how many otherwise smart scientists are blind to this political/marketing reality.

        Quackwatch is hardly a good source of information. Dr Barret is a disreputable doctor (he has lost his license) and makes many false claims. His entire website is based on his wacky erroneous medical ideology, not science.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        ddanimal
        12/10/2008
        Posts:3
        Avg Rating:
        2/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.