The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Hidden wounds: Scientists used a version of MRI known as magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging to measure the levels of two chemicals--NAA and choline--in the brains of brain-injury patients and healthy controls. In the images above, the redder the color, the higher the ratio of choline to NAA. Brain-injury patients (bottom three rows) have a higher ratio than do healthy people (top row).
Andrew Maudsley
New imaging methods may help distinguish brain damage from psychiatric disorders.
Researchers have shown that three novel imaging techniques can detect mild brain damage not visible using traditional methods. The findings will help scientists better define the type of damage that can lead to long-lasting memory and emotional problems, as well as help identify those who are most vulnerable to further trauma.
Such tools are of great interest to the military, which needs ways to distinguish traumatic brain injury from post-traumatic stress disorder. Both are common in veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, and they have similar symptoms, but they require different types of treatment. The new imaging methods may also shed light on the effect of repeated mild brain trauma, such as concussion, for which soldiers and professional athletes are at risk. Anecdotal reports about ex-football players who developed early dementia, as well as concern for thousands of military troops exposed to repeated explosions, have made the long-term consequences of these types of injury an important and controversial issue.
"Right now, a football coach has no way of knowing who can go back on the field and who shouldn't, a military officer doesn't know who should be removed from the battlefield, a lawyer doesn't know who has a real injury and who is faking," says David Brody, a neurologist and scientist at Washington University, in St. Louis.
Mild traumatic brain injury is notoriously difficult to diagnose. The brains of concussion patients often look normal on CT scans, the most common test after head trauma, and "cognitive deficits can be subtle, even to a neurologist," says Michael Selzer, a neuroscientist at the University of Pennsylvania. Fortunately, most people with concussions recover within days or weeks. But about 10 to 15 percent have persistent problems, including headaches, nausea, memory deficits, and emotional abnormalities that can linger for months or years.
Scientists hypothesize that mild head trauma damages the brain's white matter--the long projections, called axons, that ferry messages between neurons. White matter is invisible to CT scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). One of the most promising techniques for detecting subtle brain injury, called diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), is a variation of MRI that tracks water molecules in the brain's white matter. In research presented this week at the Society for Neurosciences conference in Washington, DC, Brody and his colleagues found that DTI analysis of brain-injury patients revealed signs of white-matter damage not visible with normal MRI. The damage seemed to correlate with cognitive deficits, including slowed reaction time.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
Asclaepius
53 Comments
Bumper to Bumper Bloodstreaming
As of lately, been looking at introducing a safe, benign marker into spinal fluid that would show up on cat scans, MRI studies etc, in the oncology department.
Tumors not only need blood vessels to multiply as they want to do, nerve fibers are also highly suspect of being culprits proliferating in hot spots.
If a spinal fluid marker, a contrast factor on our tecchie instrumentation was developed, to help spot cell replication gone wild, the first question to grapple with? Is there a spinal fluid brain barrier, and how do we work around it?
The problem as outlined in the article here results of testing is not cost effective as they 'require much more extensive data analysis than most medical imaging, something that radiologists aren't used to providing. "It is computationally and analytically intensive,"
Expensively time consuming as the lab process may be, results are justifiable, and as pointed out it does not address the question why some subjects suffer as a result of traumatic brain injuries while others do not, insight is revealing pathways in the brain to date have been elusive. (Identifying autoimmune nervous system components, or their non-existence, is still an immense curiosity).
Needless to say, introducing a contrast factor into damaged areas of the brain could be a boon to R&D of knowledge in the specific field of neurophysiology, with tecchie science pathfinders making inroads beyond frontier boundaries ....Yes, studying brain damage and its consequences has all kinds of peripheral benefits, contributes to a bigger picture of health care and medicine, that's the truth.
Confirming that work contemporary medicine is doing in the bloodstream is good, a double check from the nervous system as a revelation factor why some medicines work in all patients is better, what do you think?
Reply