Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Backpacks for Cells

Polymer patches hitched to the surfaces of immune cells can transport a variety of cargo.

By Jocelyn Rice

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Living cells wearing microscopic "backpacks"--nanostructured polymer patches loaded with chemical cargo--might one day be able to ferry drugs or imaging agents to diseased tissue. MIT researchers say that they have successfully constructed such backpacks, filled them with magnetic particles, and tethered them to the surfaces of immune cells without disrupting the cells' ability to interact with their environment. The work is described in a recent issue of Nano Letters.

Geared up: Two immune cells (gray) wear polymer "backpacks" (green). The attached backpacks have two layers: a cell adhesion layer that grabs on to the cell surface, and a payload layer that carries some chemical cargo--in this case, green fluorescent dye. Researchers hope that the backpacks can one day be adapted to deliver drugs or imaging agents to specific regions in the body.
Credit: Nano Letters
Multimedia
video  See the immune cells in action.

"Overall, this is a very significant piece of work," says Michael Sailor, a professor of chemistry and biochemistry at the University of California, San Diego, who was not involved in the study. "There are many possible variations on this theme for a host of different diseases. I think it could start an entirely new subdiscipline."

The backpacks are built from three thin layers of polymer film. The bottom layer anchors the backpack to a surface during construction and loading. The middle layer carries the backpack's cargo. And the top layer acts as a hook that latches on to a cell's surface.

Once they had synthesized the backpacks, the researchers added a solution containing living immune cells, which were immediately hooked by the backpacks' top layers. Then, by lowering the temperature, they triggered the bottom polymer layers to dissolve, releasing the backpack-wearing cells from the surface.

This process allows for incredible versatility in the backpacks' cargo, says Michael Rubner, director of MIT's Center for Materials Science and Engineering and senior author of the paper. Because the cells aren't added until the very end, there's no danger in using toxic chemicals and harsh conditions to build and load the backpacks. "You can use all the harsh chemistry you want, because the cell isn't there to be killed," says Rubner. "It's only in the last step of the process that the cell attaches to the surface, grabs its backpack, and lifts it off."

To test how tightly the backpacks attached, the researchers filled them with magnetic nanoparticles, loaded them onto immune cells, and placed the cells near a magnet. Under a microscope, the cells could be seen migrating toward the magnet--tugged along by their backpacks, which stayed firmly anchored in place.

Story continues below

Usually, particles incorporated into a cell's surface are internalized in a matter of seconds, says Mauro Ferrari, director of the division of nanomedicine at the University of Texas, who was not involved in the work. "The fact that this thing stays there for longer than seconds is remarkable," he says.

Sailor cautions that while the technology is promising, the real challenge will be getting it to work inside the body. There's no way of knowing at this stage how the backpack-wearing cells would fare as they circulated in the bloodstream. They might engulf or shed their packs, or lodge in tight spaces. Initial studies suggest that the backpacks don't pose any danger to the immune cells' health, but much more work is needed before the system can be tested inside a living animal, says Rubner.

Comments

  • Bacteria sized LEGOs...
    So as soon as you imply that it is possible for a single "backpack" to inadvertently "bridge" between two different cells, you've opened the doors to the creation of useful chimera... Particularly if the "backpack" (we're going to need a different word for that "tier platform" any day now) affords any form of controllable interface to the piggy-backed cell, then what we have is a device platform that can be attached to one or more functionally-chosen "engine" bases. Antibody programmable immune cells are already evidenced -- alternative "engines" of flagellum or ciliate cells could provide motive power (or manipulative capabilities, with modified cilia or flagella?) to complex assemblies. Orientation by field detection using magnetic nanoparticles should be trivial... Awesome potentials here.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    flared0ne
    11/12/2008
    Posts:40
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • An even simpler application...
    Ever hear of the Kanzius Machine??

    One critical missing piece of THAT development effort is the required ability to deliver significant quantities of conductive nano-particles directly to targeted cancer cells. Because ~IFF~ that delivery can be arranged with reasonable precision, those targeted cells can be completely disrupted, almost trivially.

    Magnetic nano-particles can be imaged using MRI (if I remember correctly) AND can be grossly positioned (with high confidence) using magnetic field gradients -- leaving the final precision-positioning task to the piggy-backed immune cells themselves. If the magnetic nano-particles can also be arranged to be conductive in the right RF field environment, we would appear to have an effectively complete feedback-control-AND-payload package.

    This "backpacking" technology could become an integral part of making the treatment of most cancers dramatically simpler, rendering unnecessary most forms of radiation therapy.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    flared0ne
    11/12/2008
    Posts:40
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Back Pack
    May be far fetched but isn't this another feature to manipulate the body; Kind of where Aubrey De Gray brings up repairing the body
    Rate this comment: 12345

    qd22vcc
    11/12/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • [no subject]
    I'm thinking less back-pack and more simple genetic code. A virus infects a cell with code, and so tinker with the virus and have the virus inject the normal code back into the cell. Or is this too simplistic..., once the damage has been done to the system of cells e.g. the damn collapses, no amount of re-infection fixes things. Perhaps with some situations this may be.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    mergatroidal
    11/21/2008
    Posts:7
    Avg Rating:
    3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.