The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
(Page 2 of 2)
The Broad group and others are now using microarrays that look for copy number variations to study a variety of common diseases. "In the next couple of years, we should really start to see new insights into the disease-causing mechanisms that result from this kind of mechanism," says Hurles. In fact, two such studies have already yielded important insights, identifying rare deletions linked to autism and schizophrenia. "If we can interrogate both kinds of variation in the same patient in the same experiment, we can get an integrated understanding of how variations come together to influence disease," says Steven McCarroll, a geneticist at the Broad and lead author of the paper.
Still, some types of copy number variations may be going undetected. In a second paper published in Nature Genetics, Greg Cooper and his colleagues at the University of Washington compared data collected using microarrays sold by Illumina with a sequencing-based assay published last year. They found that the array missed a number of changes centered on so-called hot spots, where multiple duplications--a string of four or five copies of a gene--make DNA difficult to study. Cooper says that different approaches will likely be needed to study these changes.
"The more detail we can get about our genomes--each peeling of the layer of the onion--teaches us more about disease," says Altshuler. "The technology is moving in parallel, so as we move further, we can investigate each layer in detail."
I don´t believe that this means error or garbage. It much more seems like a caching system/heap. And we are yet far too much at the beginning of research to understand its structure and to get the code running.
If you had even a simple grasp of chemical biology, barridh, you wouldn't have such a difficult time grasping the premise that nature, in all its complex and infinte wisdom, does have some rather troublesome flaws built into its overall design/construction. We only have to examine our inability to harness the simple rules of English grammar in order to understand the true nature of the problem.
... so arrogant: Don´t you judge my knowledge from your overestimation, honey!
And nature and evolution dealt without men quite well the last billions of years, thank you. It´s the stupid´s brain which messes up quite a lot at the moment, especially in biology and the so called "green revolution".
Chemical and systemic biology are quite far away to carry the Holy Grail on understanding everything. They still dig with the stig - as all of the other sciences - although much already is known. What nature certainly doesn´t need is selfproclaimed ducktapin´ wiseguys. Unfortunately they are all around.
And a significant portion of genome research is very much succumbed to the prophecies of profits and tries to understand the workings in simple mechanical logis: Having a switchboard to life. Turn off illnesses here, switch on beauty there, put the property office into the genes etc.pp.
But the genome ain´t no soap opera - and it´s not working like an american city.
Either you have a political axe to grind or your from the shallow end of the gene pool barricuda. If you had bothered to read the 'DNA tied to gognitive problems'
post, you might just have gotten a psychological profile of yourself. People who start hurling spiteful invectives around like you do, while mangling what's left of the English language, perhaps should have their head read instead.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
phoenix
172 Comments
the real nature of the problem
Lies in the fact that although, as someone so aptly put it, "God writes really tight code," all code is a little 'buggy', and as a result, prone to crash from time to time regardless of how well it's written.
Reply
shomas
246 Comments
Re: the real nature of the problem
I would hardly call such a beautifully designed system, buggy. With out this so called buggy system of mutations, repeats, deletions and survival of the fittest, DNA wouldn't have reached any kind of level of complexity with each species reaching a high level of suitably to its environment, and life in general finding new environments to inhabit.
Reply