The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Hole-y DNA: Gene microarrays (shown above) designed to measure two different kinds of genetic variation--single-base changes and larger structural variations--are shedding new light on the genetic basis of complex disease.
Broad Institute
Scanning DNA for structural changes brings new insight into disease.
Over the past two years, scientists have made a surprising discovery about our DNA. Like a book with torn pages, duplicate chapters, or upside-down paragraphs, everyone's genome is riddled with large mistakes. These "copy number variations" can include deletions, duplications, and rearrangements of stretches of DNA ranging in size from one thousand to one million base pairs. New tools to screen for such mistakes, described this month in Nature Genetics, should generate a more complete picture of the genetic root of common diseases.
"There has been a shock at the prevalence of this kind of variation and a desire to characterize it more fully and to integrate it into genome-wide studies of disease," says Matthew Hurles, a geneticist at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, in Cambridge, U.K., who was not involved in either study. "Now we have the tools that will enable those discoveries."
Over the past few years, advances in gene microarray technologies, which can quickly survey large volumes of DNA, have allowed scientists to screen more human genomes than ever before, resulting in a flood of information linking specific genes to disease. Most of these studies begin by looking for single-letter changes in the DNA code, called single-nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs (pronounced "snips"). SNPs found more often in people with a particular disease point researchers to genetic variations that might play a role in that disease. Scientists have so far identified 200 disease-linked genes using this approach, but even large studies of thousands of patients have uncovered genetic variations that account for only a small proportion of complex diseases. In type 2 diabetes, for example, the 18 disease-linked genes that have been identified explain perhaps 5 percent of the disease's heritability.
Scientists have now adapted these microarrays to identify both small SNP changes and copy number variations, which they hope will help them identify a larger fraction of disease-causing genes. In one of the papers in Nature Genetics, David Altshuler, a physician and scientist at the Broad Institute, in Cambridge, MA, and his collaborators described the design of such a chip, in collaboration with genomics instrument maker Affymetrix, which they then used to map this kind of variation.
Altshuler's team assayed the DNA of 270 people whose genomes were already being studied as part of the HapMap project, which is cataloguing common genetic variants. They found that most copy number variations are inherited, as SNPs are, rather than arising anew in individuals. That news is likely to be a relief to geneticists, because it means that they can survey many structural changes by employing the same high-throughput approach used to catalogue SNPs.
I don´t believe that this means error or garbage. It much more seems like a caching system/heap. And we are yet far too much at the beginning of research to understand its structure and to get the code running.
If you had even a simple grasp of chemical biology, barridh, you wouldn't have such a difficult time grasping the premise that nature, in all its complex and infinte wisdom, does have some rather troublesome flaws built into its overall design/construction. We only have to examine our inability to harness the simple rules of English grammar in order to understand the true nature of the problem.
... so arrogant: Don´t you judge my knowledge from your overestimation, honey!
And nature and evolution dealt without men quite well the last billions of years, thank you. It´s the stupid´s brain which messes up quite a lot at the moment, especially in biology and the so called "green revolution".
Chemical and systemic biology are quite far away to carry the Holy Grail on understanding everything. They still dig with the stig - as all of the other sciences - although much already is known. What nature certainly doesn´t need is selfproclaimed ducktapin´ wiseguys. Unfortunately they are all around.
And a significant portion of genome research is very much succumbed to the prophecies of profits and tries to understand the workings in simple mechanical logis: Having a switchboard to life. Turn off illnesses here, switch on beauty there, put the property office into the genes etc.pp.
But the genome ain´t no soap opera - and it´s not working like an american city.
Either you have a political axe to grind or your from the shallow end of the gene pool barricuda. If you had bothered to read the 'DNA tied to gognitive problems'
post, you might just have gotten a psychological profile of yourself. People who start hurling spiteful invectives around like you do, while mangling what's left of the English language, perhaps should have their head read instead.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
phoenix
172 Comments
the real nature of the problem
Lies in the fact that although, as someone so aptly put it, "God writes really tight code," all code is a little 'buggy', and as a result, prone to crash from time to time regardless of how well it's written.
Reply
shomas
246 Comments
Re: the real nature of the problem
I would hardly call such a beautifully designed system, buggy. With out this so called buggy system of mutations, repeats, deletions and survival of the fittest, DNA wouldn't have reached any kind of level of complexity with each species reaching a high level of suitably to its environment, and life in general finding new environments to inhabit.
Reply