Biomedicine

How to Catch Olympic Cheats

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Wednesday, August 13, 2008
  • By Emily Singer

He ultimately hopes to use mass spectrometry, the gold standard in analytical chemistry, to detect all forms and variants of EPO with a single test. Mass spec measures the unique spectral profiles generated by different molecules, giving an unambiguous method of detection. While the technique is already used to detect other banned drugs, the chemical structure of the EPO molecule makes it difficult to measure using traditional mass spectrometry. "It is a complex drug with glyco groups hanging off it," says Catlin. "We have to get rid of these groups or find a way to characterize the whole intact molecule."

Another significant challenge for the antidoping authorities is human growth hormone (hGH). This drug is virtually identical to the most common form of growth hormone produced naturally by the body. It is made by inserting the human gene for the growth hormone into bacteria.

The current test for hGH was first used at the 2004 games in Athens, and it will be used more broadly in Beijing. The test analyzes the ratio of different forms of the hormone in the blood. "If an athlete uses recombinant hGH, which is identical to the major isoform of natural hGH, the ratios that normally occur are influenced and significantly altered," says Mario Thevis, a professor of preventive doping research at the German Sport University Cologne. "This can be measured and visualized, and enables the detection of hGH misuse." Thevis is also working on a more sensitive test that can detect different varieties of hGH.

And while WADA prefers to stay mum on the specific details of new tests currently under development, the agency has disclosed details of a broader new approach that might overcome some of the challenges associated with detection of EPO and hGH. Using new technologies, such as microarrays, which can simultaneously measure changes in the expression of thousands of genes, proteins, and other biomarkers, scientists can quickly search for biological changes induced by such drugs. "The new armamentarium doesn't look for drug X; it looks for the effects of drug X," says Theodore Friedmann, a physician scientist at the University of California, San Diego, who is working with WADA. Thanks to this approach, altering a drug so that it becomes invisible to testing will no longer be possible, he says.

Print

Related Articles

New Drugs Mimic Exercise

Compounds boost endurance and allow mice to run for substantially longer.

Amputee Gets a Shot at the Olympics

Hugh Herr explains the scientific evidence behind the decision.

Next-Generation Sports Doping

New drugs in clinical trials for muscle-wasting diseases could become the next big thing for athletes.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

carlii

30 Comments

  • 1280 Days Ago
  • 08/13/2008

Retro Testing

As new tests are developed, do the Olympic Committees have access to the blood samples from prior Olympics?  That is, will we be seeing Olympic metals froms 2008, 2004, and 2000 Olympics later retracted as the drug detection science improves?

Reply

Emily Singer

26 Comments

  • 1280 Days Ago
  • 08/13/2008

Re: Retro Testing

Samples collected during the Beijing games will be kept for 8 years so that they can be retested when more sensitive detection methods are developed. I'm not sure about samples from the 2000 and 2004 games.

Reply

czepp

1 Comment

  • 1280 Days Ago
  • 08/13/2008

Can these tests determine how old someone is?

If so, then why aren't these tests being used to screen for underage gymnasts?

Reply

Emily Singer

26 Comments

  • 1280 Days Ago
  • 08/13/2008

Re: Can these tests determine how old someone is?

No. As far as I know, there are no biological tests to precisely determine age. This column at Slate can tell you more: http://www.slate.com/id/2197365/

Reply

gabrielg01

450 Comments

  • 1280 Days Ago
  • 08/13/2008

Those guys are naive

In the last paragraph there is this quote "The new armamentarium doesn't look for drug X; it looks for the effects of drug X," , and then they conclude that this new approach will catch the "undetectable" drugs.

First off, looking for biochemical changes and then claiming that drugs were used will be a very contentious issue. Similar changes could be induced with legal drugs, or certain chemical changes in the diet. The accusers will not have a smoking gun but only the smoke. There will doping accusations based on very vague and circumstantial data.

Second, what makes these people think that the drug effects themselves won't be amenable for cover-up medication?

Reply

Emily Singer

26 Comments

  • 1279 Days Ago
  • 08/14/2008

Re: Those guys are naive

It's true, using biological responses to detect drug use will be a very contentious issue and one that is eventually likely to play out in the courts. That's why scientists will need to find markers with a very tight link to the drug -- they are studying drug responses in people of different ages and ethnicities to make sure candidate markers show the same effects in these groups.

Reply

irreverent

14 Comments

  • 1277 Days Ago
  • 08/16/2008

Re: Those guys are naive

This strategy is already being used without challenge. For example, hematocrit levels are being used to show blood doping and EPO use in the absence of direct proof of usage. It is extremely difficult to cover up gene expression profiles involving hundreds of genes because they are so unique. It would be the equivalent of trying to cover up your DNA profile. Athletes have been trying to cover up drug use with diuretics for years but they just test for the diuretics instead and catch them that way. What will be really difficult to detect is direct muscle modification by DNA transfer. This cheat has already been shown to work in animal models. Detection would require a muscle biopsy which would not be well accepted by athletes. Another more difficult scenario to control will be the testing and breeding of athletes that are partial myostatin knock outs. These occur naturally and can be easily detected so that unscrupulous countries could breed athletes that have these mutations to great advantage. 

Reply

Advertisement

tangent

1 Comment

  • 1274 Days Ago
  • 08/19/2008

AMPK and PPARd Agonists

Does anyone see this paper on last issue of cell?
"AMPK and PPARd Agonists Are Exercise Mimetics"
http://www.cell.com/content/article/abstract?uid=PIIS0092867408008386
The PPARd Agonists definitely is a good drug for cheat!

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

ARM Holdings

Synthetic Genomics

Nissan

BIND Biosciences

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement