Biomedicine

An Artificial Pancreas

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Friday, August 8, 2008
  • By Lauren Gravitz

Hovorka used two devices, both commercially available. The first, a continuous glucose monitor, consists of a subcutaneous sensor that measures glucose levels in tissue beneath the skin and a device that communicates wirelessly with the sensor to download its data. The second is the pump itself, a pager-size device with an insulin reservoir that delivers the drug through a thin tube to a subcutaneous needle. Hovorka and his collaborators added an algorithm that not only put the pump and sensor in communication with each other, but also took the (sleeping) user out of the picture by determining precisely how much insulin to mete out every 15 minutes.

When tested in 12 children with type 1 diabetes, the closed-loop system brought the kids' blood-glucose levels into the target range 61 percent of the time, up from 23 percent for those who followed their normal routine. "With the closed loop, we are able to avoid the extremes--the extreme bad low and the extreme bad high," Hovorka says. He's currently working with device makers in the industry to create a marketable commercial product.

Technologically, the remaining obstacles for researchers are those of refinement--for example, constructing algorithms that are exquisitely honed to predict in which direction glucose levels are moving and at what rate. Other researchers are working on sensors that can monitor blood glucose over an extended period of time (currently, sensors must be replaced every three to eight days) and with improved accuracy.

Despite the fact that much of the technology is on the market, researchers must still prove to the FDA that their system is safe when combined with the algorithms, and that if anything goes wrong--if a sensor goes wonky or the insulin pump clogs up--the computer can sense it and either set off an alarm or turn the whole system off.

"You don't have to get the perfect system to make a tremendous advance and make it considerably easier to live with diabetes," says William Tamborlane, chief of pediatric endocrinology at Yale School of Medicine, who invented insulin-pump therapy in the late 1970s. As a clinician, he's more interested in seeing these incremental advances make their way to the patients than in waiting for a perfect system to be created. "We now have sensors that can say what the blood sugar's doing every minute," Tamborlane says. "And we have insulin pumps that can change how much insulin it gives on a minute-to-minute basis. We have the technology right now to come pretty close to what might be considered the ultimate solution."


Print

Related Articles

The Glucose-Monitoring Tattoo

A novel nanosensor could be used for skin-based glucose sensing.

Smart Insulin

An experimental drug for diabetes dispenses insulin in response to glucose levels.

Bloodless Diabetes Monitoring

A new noninvasive tool uses electromagnetic waves to measure glucose levels.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

travism

8 Comments

  • 1285 Days Ago
  • 08/09/2008

Wouldn't it be great...

This would be a great "cure" for diabetes if the device could even make its own insulin.  How hard would it be to make a little insulin producing "fermenter" chamber, full of appropriately modified insulin producing bacteria, which could produce insulin out of components it is able to extract from the blood.

That would result in a zero maintenance device which could conceivably keep going for years without even needing to top it up.

Reply

phoenix

172 Comments

  • 1285 Days Ago
  • 08/09/2008

Re: Wouldn't it be great...

An interesting and innovative concept, but can it work? Perhaps you could ask someone with a medically related background to give you some feedback. Although this is not my field of expertise, Iv'e learned that great ideas can sometimes have the most humble of beginnings.

Reply

NovaLand

1 Comment

  • 1284 Days Ago
  • 08/10/2008

Re: Wouldn't it be great...

You're not that far off. In fact, transplantation of cells creating insulin have been tested, but the usual rejection problems occurred. They're thinking of making a "coat" for the cells so they wont get rejected. Compare that to an insulin pump creating insulin by its own, inluding regulating the levels and you see where we're going.

Reply

ms

190 Comments

  • 1284 Days Ago
  • 08/10/2008

typo

"a continuous sensor to detect insulin levels in real time"
You mean glucose level?

Reply

nfarrell22

1 Comment

  • 1282 Days Ago
  • 08/12/2008

Re: typo

Yes, part of the calculation needs to know how much curculating insilin. As a Type II I manufacture too much insulin ans my body tries to overcome the insulin resistance that is part of the desease.

Reply

Brittany Sauser

46 Comments

  • 1274 Days Ago
  • 08/20/2008

Re: typo

ms,

Yes, the article now says "glucose". Thanks for noticing this typo.

Brittany

Reply

Buckwheat469

34 Comments

  • 1282 Days Ago
  • 08/12/2008

Good start

This is a good start on what should have been created already, but I understand that the FDA gets in the way and there's not much incentive in producing a device for only 23.6 million people (http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/dm/pubs/statistics/).

I would try something like this, as a type 1 diabetic, but I would prefer a watch-style glucometer. It's a good interim product and could diminish the need for carrying blood glucose meters around everywhere, and reduce the overall cost of buying test strips (for those who don't know, it's $60+ for a box which might last a month).

This device, however, is not what type 1 diabetics need. We really need a fix. Our pancreas isn't broken, like many type 2's, it's being suppressed by our immune systems (for the most part). While devices like these help the immediate issues, they only slow progress toward finding a cure by making the public forget that we have a life threatening and economic problem.

Type 1 diabetes isn't a choice, it wasn't caused by overeating or getting old, it's not a genetic disease in most cases, and it's not something you catch. It's a luck of the draw disease that anyone can get, which is why it is absolutely something that deserves a cure. Type 2, in my opinion, is something that could benefit from a fancy device since type 2 is mostly caused by lifestyle or age.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

iRobot

Joule Unlimited

Amyris

A123 Systems

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement