Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

An Artificial Pancreas

Continued from page 1

By Lauren Gravitz

Friday, August 08, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Hovorka used two devices, both commercially available. The first, a continuous glucose monitor, consists of a subcutaneous sensor that measures glucose levels in tissue beneath the skin and a device that communicates wirelessly with the sensor to download its data. The second is the pump itself, a pager-size device with an insulin reservoir that delivers the drug through a thin tube to a subcutaneous needle. Hovorka and his collaborators added an algorithm that not only put the pump and sensor in communication with each other, but also took the (sleeping) user out of the picture by determining precisely how much insulin to mete out every 15 minutes.

When tested in 12 children with type 1 diabetes, the closed-loop system brought the kids' blood-glucose levels into the target range 61 percent of the time, up from 23 percent for those who followed their normal routine. "With the closed loop, we are able to avoid the extremes--the extreme bad low and the extreme bad high," Hovorka says. He's currently working with device makers in the industry to create a marketable commercial product.

Technologically, the remaining obstacles for researchers are those of refinement--for example, constructing algorithms that are exquisitely honed to predict in which direction glucose levels are moving and at what rate. Other researchers are working on sensors that can monitor blood glucose over an extended period of time (currently, sensors must be replaced every three to eight days) and with improved accuracy.

Despite the fact that much of the technology is on the market, researchers must still prove to the FDA that their system is safe when combined with the algorithms, and that if anything goes wrong--if a sensor goes wonky or the insulin pump clogs up--the computer can sense it and either set off an alarm or turn the whole system off.

"You don't have to get the perfect system to make a tremendous advance and make it considerably easier to live with diabetes," says William Tamborlane, chief of pediatric endocrinology at Yale School of Medicine, who invented insulin-pump therapy in the late 1970s. As a clinician, he's more interested in seeing these incremental advances make their way to the patients than in waiting for a perfect system to be created. "We now have sensors that can say what the blood sugar's doing every minute," Tamborlane says. "And we have insulin pumps that can change how much insulin it gives on a minute-to-minute basis. We have the technology right now to come pretty close to what might be considered the ultimate solution."


Comments

  • Wouldn't it be great...
    This would be a great "cure" for diabetes if the device could even make its own insulin.  How hard would it be to make a little insulin producing "fermenter" chamber, full of appropriately modified insulin producing bacteria, which could produce insulin out of components it is able to extract from the blood.

    That would result in a zero maintenance device which could conceivably keep going for years without even needing to top it up.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    travism
    08/09/2008
    Posts:8
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Wouldn't it be great...
      An interesting and innovative concept, but can it work? Perhaps you could ask someone with a medically related background to give you some feedback. Although this is not my field of expertise, Iv'e learned that great ideas can sometimes have the most humble of beginnings.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      phoenix
      08/09/2008
      Posts:172
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
    • Re: Wouldn't it be great...
      You're not that far off. In fact, transplantation of cells creating insulin have been tested, but the usual rejection problems occurred. They're thinking of making a "coat" for the cells so they wont get rejected. Compare that to an insulin pump creating insulin by its own, inluding regulating the levels and you see where we're going.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      NovaLand
      08/10/2008
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • typo
    "a continuous sensor to detect insulin levels in real time"
    You mean glucose level?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ms
    08/10/2008
    Posts:130
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: typo
      Yes, part of the calculation needs to know how much curculating insilin. As a Type II I manufacture too much insulin ans my body tries to overcome the insulin resistance that is part of the desease.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      nfarrell22
      08/12/2008
      Posts:1
    • Re: typo
      ms,

      Yes, the article now says "glucose". Thanks for noticing this typo.

      Brittany
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Brittany Sau...
      08/20/2008
      Posts:32
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • Good start
    This is a good start on what should have been created already, but I understand that the FDA gets in the way and there's not much incentive in producing a device for only 23.6 million people (http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/dm/pubs/statistics/).

    I would try something like this, as a type 1 diabetic, but I would prefer a watch-style glucometer. It's a good interim product and could diminish the need for carrying blood glucose meters around everywhere, and reduce the overall cost of buying test strips (for those who don't know, it's $60+ for a box which might last a month).

    This device, however, is not what type 1 diabetics need. We really need a fix. Our pancreas isn't broken, like many type 2's, it's being suppressed by our immune systems (for the most part). While devices like these help the immediate issues, they only slow progress toward finding a cure by making the public forget that we have a life threatening and economic problem.

    Type 1 diabetes isn't a choice, it wasn't caused by overeating or getting old, it's not a genetic disease in most cases, and it's not something you catch. It's a luck of the draw disease that anyone can get, which is why it is absolutely something that deserves a cure. Type 2, in my opinion, is something that could benefit from a fancy device since type 2 is mostly caused by lifestyle or age.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Buckwheat469
    08/12/2008
    Posts:34
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

White Matter
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.