The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Technology Review
Compounds boost endurance and allow mice to run for substantially longer.
The elusive exercise pill just took a step closer to becoming a reality. Scientists have found that two compounds can boost endurance in mice by changing the metabolic properties of the animals' muscle. One of the drugs appears to mimic some of the benefits of exercise even in sedentary mice. But the most dramatic benefit comes from combining one of the drugs with exercise, enabling mice to run 60 to 75 percent longer.
In previous research, Ronald Evans and his colleagues from the Salk Institute, in La Jolla, CA, genetically engineered so-called marathon mice, animals with double the running endurance of their normal counterparts. The mice gained their superstamina with a boost in the expression of a gene called PPARδ. Evans's team has now found a way to trigger the same effect using drugs, a development that could potentially make the result applicable to humans.
In research published today in the journal Cell, the scientists tested two compounds that crank up the PPARδ pathway, with slightly different effects. One drug, which acts upstream of PPARδ, enhances running endurance by 44 percent. "It's tricking the muscle into believing it's been exercised daily," said Evans in a statement released by the Salk Institute. "It proves you can have a pharmacological equivalent to exercise."
A drug that directly activates PPARδ was even more effective, but only when combined with exercise. It had no effect on sedentary mice, but it allowed active mice to run 60 to 75 percent longer. The drugs work differently than anabolic steroids or other muscle-building drugs currently in development, which increase muscle mass but not endurance.
If the findings hold true in humans, the drugs could provide a new way to induce the health benefits of exercise, especially in people who find it difficult but are most in need, such as those who are obese or at high risk of diabetes. "Why don't people exercise when they know it's good for them? Because it's hard; you feel fatigued," says William Evans, director of the Nutrition, Metabolism, and Exercise Laboratory at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, in Little Rock. "Perhaps a product like this might help people who have a hard time initiating an exercise program." William Evans was not involved in the research.
Muscle is made up of two types of fibers: fast-twitch fibers, which generate power and speed, and slow-twitch or fatigue-resistant fibers, responsible for endurance. Endurance training triggers genetic changes that shift muscle metabolism toward the slow-twitch type of muscle, which burns fat. (Fast-twitch fibers burn carbohydrates.)
I'm watching the Olympic Games in Beijing and can't help wonder when drug development will put a stop to all the fun. The article points out that top endurance athletes have 80-90 percent slow-twitch muscle fibers and discusses if a working drug like the PPAR activator would have any effect at all. At the level of top athletes where the difference between winning and loosing is so small I suspect that even a minute positive effect will make a big difference. I also suspect that any drug that can give positive effects with less training will help reduce the risk of injury and diseases. Let's hope anti doping can keep up.
In the long run however, with more and more medical and drug development aimed at improving human health and performance, I wonder if we could see another effect: Even if anti doping work is able to keep up with drug development there still is the issue of normal people outperforming top athletes and how this will affect public interest for sports. How fun is it when your next door neighbor runs better than the Olympic champion?
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
ggeorge
4 Comments
Where's the rest of the story?
Okay. So how is this any different than caffeine or any other stimulant? Don't they also "give you energy" to do more than you otherwise would?
Reply
Shoreliner11
9 Comments
Re: Where's the rest of the story?
The difference is that caffeine supplies you with energy, though what they're talking about in this article actually changes the muscle fibers itself after a workout. So you have more endurance while running and more muscle fibers after which are responsible for endurance.
Reply
polyparadigm
6 Comments
Re: Where's the rest of the story?
Caffeine uses machinery that was set up to handle adrenaline; your body responds to it (and most stimulants) as it would to fear or excitement, and much of its effect on your muscles is cardiovascular.
These new drugs are targeted (as the article mentions) at machinery that handles post-exercise hormones. As Shoreliner11 mentions, it signals your muscles to alter their cellular structure. I imagine it will feel a lot different (probably not psychotropic at all, unlike caffeine) and take a lot longer to kick in and to wear off.
Reply