Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

The Secrets of Anti-Aging Genes

Continued from page 1

By Emily Singer

Thursday, July 17, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Topol and his collaborators will compare the gene sequences from the healthy volunteers with DNA samples collected from people who died from age-related diseases before they reached their eighties. The scientists have already found that the healthy people had only a slightly lower probability of carrying disease-linked variations. That supports the idea that protective genes are playing a major role in people's successful aging.

Scientists hope that identifying the molecular basis for this protective effect will enable them to mimic it with drugs. "We believe longevity genes are protecting against several age-related diseases rather than just one," says Nir Barzilai, head of the Longevity Genes Project at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, in New York, who is not involved in the Scripps study. "From a pharmaceutical perspective, it would be more cost effective to target these pathways, and it would really imitate exceptional longevity rather than just treating the diseases themselves."

Barzilai has already identified a couple of candidates for longevity genes. In an ongoing study of people of Ashkenazi Jewish descent age 95 or older, Barzilai and his colleagues showed that the elderly group was more likely to carry a gene variant that changes the way that people process cholesterol. More recently, the scientists sequenced the genes for IGF1 and its receptor and found mutations unique to female centenarians.

While Barzilai is taking a different approach to the gene hunt--using microarrays--he says that each group looks forward to learning what the other finds. Having two large studies of the genetics of healthy aging will allow each to confirm its findings in a second population--a crucial test of the validity of large-scale genomic studies.


Comments

  • Redefining old age
    If we get to live to 100 or even beyond, and retire in the 60s, then practically more than 40% of one's lifespan is considered old age. It seems rather odd that almost half of life is spent in the geriatric stage.
    Perhaps those in their 60s should not be considered old then. Perhaps our perceptions require some redefining.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    gabrielg01
    07/19/2008
    Posts:396
    Avg Rating:
    3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.