Biomedicine

Safer Prenatal Testing

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Wednesday, April 23, 2008
  • By Jocelyn Rice

A similar technology developed by Biocept, also based in San Diego, has likewise been clinically validated, and it will launch in early May. It expands upon Sequenom's approach by scanning for a large number of SNPs that distinguish between maternal and fetal DNA. That way, a negative result can be confidently attributed to an Rh-negative fetus rather than to a failure to detect the Rh-encoding gene.

A complementary approach to noninvasive prenatal testing involves isolating fetal cells, rather than nucleic acids, from the maternal bloodstream. This strategy is especially amenable to testing for Down syndrome and other chromosome copy number defects. With fetal cells on hand, diagnosing Down syndrome is straightforward: all it takes is a probe to fluorescently stain chromosome 21 and a microscope to count how many copies are present.

"If you can get an intact fetal cell, you have access to the entire fetal genome noninvasively," says Bianchi. "So that's what's enchanted people for a long period of time." But because a milliliter of maternal blood contains fewer than five fetal cells, this tactic presents enormous technical hurdles."You're on the hunt for extremely rare cells," says Bianchi.

Biocept deals with this challenge by targeting immature, nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs), which are much more likely to come from the fetus than from the mother. NRBCs can be sorted from other cell types using antibodies that latch on to proteins unique to their surfaces, and their unusual morphology makes them easy to spot under a microscope.

"When you find an NRBC, chances are it's going to be fetal," says Farideh Bischoff, Biocept's vice president of translational research and development.

The Biocept cell-based testing platform uses a microfluidic system, in which the mother's blood is channeled across a surface studded with antibodies that capture immature red blood cells. The surface is microscopically engineered to maximize the blood's exposure to the antibodies, dramatically upping the chances of pulling out any immature red blood cells that may be present.

Biocept will begin clinical evaluation of this platform next month as a noninvasive Down syndrome test, and it may become commercially available before the end of 2008.

Another company tackling the fetal-cell-based approach to noninvasive prenatal testing is Ikonisys, based in New Haven, CT. Instead of physically sorting NRBCs from other cell types, Ikonisys takes a brute-force computational approach. The company has developed an automated microscope that scans slide after slide of maternal blood, using cell shape to distinguish fetal cells from other nucleated cell types. The microscope includes software that compiles the locations of potentially relevant cells, obviating the need for a more subjective manual scan and thus reducing human error. A technician can then inspect those cells and make a final ruling on their status.

"Rather than mechanically filtering, we're using a combination of visualization and artificial intelligence," says Paul White, CFO and president of Ikonisys. "The microscope does the hard part."

Ikonisys plans to launch its Down syndrome test in late 2008. The company is also adapting its technology for use in oncology, where the ability to identify rare cancerous cells in a sea of healthy cells could help diagnose certain cancers and monitor their response to treatment.

Print

Related Articles

Analyzing the Unborn Genome

Mapping the genome of a fetus from its mother's blood could mean less risky screening for prenatal diseases.

Improving Prenatal Testing

A DNA chip could make it easier to diagnose rare conditions while the patient is still in utero.

A Simpler Test for Detecting Down's Syndrome

A new blood test uses scraps of fetal DNA to piece together a prenatal diagnosis.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

expediteur

1 Comment

  • 1391 Days Ago
  • 04/24/2008

Human being intelligence has no limits

Such an article makes me admire to live in 2008 and to see how the scientists all over the world put their competences into the profit of all the people. Still, there should be enough reasonable parents to believe in science and to avoid eventual risks.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

First Solar

American Superconductor

Siemens

Lattice Power

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement