Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Faster DNA Sequencing

Continued from page 1

By Emily Singer

Tuesday, April 08, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Despite its novel technology, Helicos still has some hurdles to overcome. The technology hasn't yet demonstrated clear advantages over the most sophisticated sequencing machines currently in use. "Single-molecule sequencing has lots of benefits, but it's very hard from an optics standpoint to detect a single molecule on a piece of DNA," says Mardis. Because of this, the Helicos machine is much more expensive than the alternatives.

"We're still a little underwhelmed," says George Weinstock, associate director of the Genome Sequencing Center at Washington University. "Right now, I would say it's a wash, in terms of time and cost. I would say they're a couple of years out from having an impact."

Still, the advance is "a pretty big accomplishment," says Jeff Schloss, director of the Genome Technology Program at the National Human Genome Research Institute in Bethesda, MD. "It's important to get these results in the peer-reviewed literature." Some scientists have criticized a series of impressive but unpublished sequencing claims, saying it's too difficult to evaluate them without having detailed information on the methodology.

Helicos is soon likely to face another slew of competitors. Development of so-called "third generation" sequencing technologies is already under way--these systems aim to sequence a single molecule of DNA in real time, boosting speed and reducing the amount and cost of chemicals used in the process.

Helicos is also moving forward rapidly. The technology used in the Science paper has already been replaced in the company's commercial device, improving on some faults described in the paper, such as difficulty reading certain repetitive sequences.Says Timothy Harris, senior director of research at Helicos and lead author on the paper, "Things change faster than you can publish them."

Comments

  • At birth?
    Personally I'd shell out the 1000$ to get myself and any kids I may have in the future their genomes scanned.  Also I don't think it would be a stretch to have this added to public healthcare (in Canada here) so this is done at birth for everyone who wants it.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Shiladie
    04/08/2008
    Posts:55
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • huh?
    isn't the $1000 genome already possible?

    www.23andme.com

    maybe i'm missing something.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    rocknrollano...
    04/10/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
    • Re: huh?
      23andMe's service does cost about $1000, but it doesn't offer genome sequencing. It's approach is to search thousands of spots along the genome for specific genetic variations linked to disease and other factors. But the company does not "read" the entire genome, which is what sequencing entails.  
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Emily Singer
      04/14/2008
      Posts:20
      Avg Rating:
      4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.